Consider this: when history looks back on times when children were rounded up and put into camps, it's never viewed positively. It's always considered a shameful atrocity and the people who support it are always remembered as small-minded fools, easily deceived by populous rhetoric.
And that's how you know if you're on the right side of history or not.
Try not being a criminal next time beaners.
ICE and Zionists... a match made in heaven
Aryans stand against ICE and stand against Palestinian genocide.
Where ice send him ?
Those are juvenile delinquents.
oh no a precious child was returned to his country of citizenship with legal guardians, guess I must support the Kalergi plan now congrats OP you changed my mind on this issue. So bring on that sweet, sweet tide of demographic replacement.
Just kidding. OP = faget
Try not being a criminal
what's wrong with being like the president or his wife?
They are just gonna let them go like 90% of the beaners they detain
People who were on the right side of history often did the most brutal shit to other people. But they nonetheless won and the world has been irreversibly changed by them. The French revolution being one example. Arresting illegal immigrants is a nothingburger compared to that.
right side of history
I imagine a future in which no one is hand wringing over this kind of shit because they're all too busy living through a golden age.
Not my problem.
demographic replacement
in america
Adding mexicans would make america whiter at this point
They're lucky, they're about to get a free bus ride home!
This is a pic of ICE arresting children
awesome, keep me posted.
Fpbp
OP BTFO
Jew on Latvia
It’s 1930s Germany across the entire planet, hymie
fuck spics
t. Jose Alberto Gonzalez
What exactly is the alternative? What are you advocating for?
you don't get it, they really feel like being here!
Literally don't care one bit.
When did white people sign a treaty stating they would have to hold a 24/7/365 daycare for shitskins?
it's just like weimar republic
Pseudo-intellectual garbage
History will treat this as a high point in the recovery of the white man from white genocide - finally overcoming one of his most dangerous fatal flaws.
Give an example. Oh right you make shit up.
Consider this: when I poop, I call it "dropping the little niggers off at the pool" because black people are the same color as poopoo.
I don't think anyone in my family would have dragged me to another country when I was a kid. So why should I care that someone's in trouble because they decided to leave their country? I don't go shitting up other countries, I'm fine with shitting up Canada. So that's on them.
Lemme tell you about "when history looks back" you stupid faggot
our entire nation had been flooded by illegal immigrants on part of a long-standing criminal operation to totally disrupt The free world (jews)
And it doesn't fucking matter what your emotions are about it
Remember the rape trees when human trafficking across the border with cartels paying members to CPS smuggle for fuck houses and butcher hell holes? Yeah you have no fucking clue
Drink yourself some pepsi and stfu while you import millions of children
Why aren’t they executing them ?
children
Illegal children
It will be white kids next. Stop supporting child abusing kikes
Remember when American kids were forced to attend school with niglets at gun point? Most people don't. If the optics will be rewritten when we are gone then who gives a shit. Return all the poos to the loos of the world, out with the turd and back to the third for you.
FPBP
i voted for this
Consider this, they don't fucking belong there, and they are leeching of of White people
If you love your children stay home, and carefully teach them access to white people is not a right
Checked and sure hope you're right
Try not being a criminal next time beaners.
This. Grind them into fertilizer, I don't give a shit. Anything is better than them leeching off our tax dollars and sending our wealth to third world shitholes. It's a triple wammy to turn them into something productive for US. Three chickens with one stone.
every great civilization has defended its borders. This will be seen as a great recovery after the disastrous 2010s.
It's always considered
are always remembered
yes, by wealthy leftist academic who don't have to worry about safety, security and the consequences of their ideologies. It's the thankless task of people with real jobs to create the conditions where those fags can make a great public career out of blaming them for everything bad. Nobody gives credit for the crime that did not happen because the criminal subhumans were thrown out of the country in time.
That’s because you don’t have kids. If somebody disrespects your kids, you know it ain’t right and it makes your blood boil. Other people who have kids will sympathize with you more than they sympathize with an incel. In fact, MAGA supporters will feel more inclined to help an immigrant family than they will help an incel because the incel might shoot their kids. Incels are like an untamed wild animal and you don’t know when they’ll pop off
wealthy leftist academic
Many years ago I saw a guest on C-SPAN who said "academics are the servants of the elite", and it's always stuck with me.
I was confused because at the time I thought academia and public think tanks were driving policy, but of course most of these organizations are created and maintained by the elite, and that's who gives their employees their agendas.
I'll take the cunny.
Lot of truth here.
Mother's attachment to their offspring.
The looser attachment between mating adults.
The lose attachment of fathers to their offspring.
The distinction between (women and children) and (men) as categories.
The distinction between single men (dangerous) and married men (safe).
All of these represent biases at least as strong as and as influential as racial bias. But they don't talk to us about this, nor do they try to push against it.
Nobody crusades to have mothers care for their children less, so they are biased in favor of them less, and to make the bias between the genders more equal.
While men pushed for universalism, feminism is deeply grounded in these innate biases. Feminism is basically
why should men have more when women are more important?
"Equality" is just the crowbar, invented by male philosophy, used by feminists to constantly insist upon a shift in the social foundations so the unspoken biases always tip in favor of women.
"Equality" always benefits women, because of the aforementioned innate human biases placing "women and children first".