Peterstein in a nutshell.
Peterstein in a nutshell
Just kys at this point
Define "nutshell"
His core problem is that he routinely jettisons his entire golemOS when it's time for the bank account to be topped off.
All his noises about cain the brother murdering sodomite from syriapalestina. That's him, that's Judas Iscariot, aka Jordan Peterson.
He won't denounce Benjamin Netenyahu and there is no grounds for it being a greater good, like the german hiding a jew because $gods_plan, other than a financial one.
JP will deceive for personal financial gains, which is why he's super rich. Honest men never get rich in the USA, you have to steal, and lean in and steal bigly, duffels packed tight with stolen buying power, at some point, to be rich in the USA.
The 20 year old is right. Jordan peterson is nothing, at best he's a bag of Judeo-Christian polyergusformica tricks, at worst, he's a run of the mill con man.
I don't think you know what you mean by "just" "kys" "at" "this" and "point"
This is bloody complicated, bucko.
Something you prioritize.
Jordan Peterson is mostly Jewish, that's how he can stand up to the Polyergus and win. JP isn't Christianity, Christianity is slave os.
If he were to be honest he'd say: "I wear God and Christianity like I wear clothing, sometimes I like it, but other times I have to be different religions so that Christianity isn't faced with that which will prove it's nothing but a hill of beans for a bunch of slaves in occupied Palestine.
Kek its so good
I could have btfo Peterstien even harder
This old Nigga is being pushed by you fucking morons all the time, no one even knew him
When the 20 year old blurted out: "yeah, and you aren't anything at all".
Is 1000% spot on.
Jordan Peterson is a superposition of religions, not any single on of them.
Define "something you prioritise"
His core problem is he’s a fucking retard
he's a druggie, everything else is moot
You zionists made him famous by making a big deal out of his pronoun refusal, retard.
The man was completely sane and coherent until you zonked him up on diazepam and threatened to murder his stupid daughter as if him shilling for your gay bullshit wouldn't undermine the very thing that made him popular with people in the first place.
Benzon Schrodinger Peterstein is his full name.
Now that's a ridiculous hypothetical, I can't answer that.
do you believe in the Bible?
the Bible is a hyperlinked library of wisdom across centuries. It’s not a book you simply “believe in.”
so you don't take it literally?
literalism is a modern distortion. Stories operate on multiple planes of reality.
you're avoiding the question.
i’m challenging its premises.
are you saved?
i think the idea of salvation is psychological, social, and metaphysical.
so you're not saved?
i'm working on aligning myself with the Logos.
is that a yes?
it's a process, not a status.
do you believe in Heaven and Hell?
we live them out psychologically. Every day.
that’s not what the Bible says.
well, the Bible isn’t a manual. It’s a narrative architecture of meaning.
are you afraid of going to Hell?
i’m more afraid of becoming the kind of person who belongs there.
do you think atheists can be moral?
hat depends what you mean by “moral,” and whether they're standing on borrowed ethical capital.
borrowed from what?
from Judeo-Christian metaphysics. From millennia of cultural evolution.
so they’re moral, but for the wrong reasons?
they’re moral, but they don’t know why.
so you’re better than them?
no, but I may be more aware of the foundations.
so why not just say you're a Christian?
because I’m not willing to trivialize that claim.
Fedoras mad.
Define "Now that's a ridiculous hypothetical, I can't answer that."
the Bible is a hyperlinked library of wisdom across centuries. It’s not a book you simply “believe in.”
He needs to inform his Christian followers about this, I don't think they know.
If you said that few centuries back would be executed for heresy.
JUDEN BENZOWITZ PETERSTEIN
If you said that few centuries back
So? Where does it say religious understanding doesn't evolve? Peterson even referenced Cardinal Newman in that debate.
Dictionary Definition
The Fluidic noises during shapeshift is something out of scifi shapeshifter meets Jumper movie.
bleilqhohoggggggfsfsfss.
What the fuck was that you just teleported across the room.
bleilqhohoggggggfsfsfss.
It only happens when I get really angry.
He's trying to break the sentence down to make it less about absolutes so you can granulate and answer the question as smaller parts that serve to answer the proposed question. This is not him having a melty. Legitimately, this is a good way to get someone to think about a problem when they can't see nuance.
Yes, jews, jews. If you can't even see what he's doing you weren't going to conquer ZOG anyway.
Where does it say religious understanding doesn't evolve?
I wasn't aware the scriptures magically change over time, my bad.
Never gets old.
youtube.com
Why can't Peterson just say "I am not Christian, I am atheist, I do not believe in God or Christ, but I respect Christianity and try to live my life by Christian moral standards". How hard could it be?
One look at his wife explains why he is a good goy. His wife literally looks like the spirit cooking kike marina, a demon
you talk like a fag and your shit's all retarded
shifts goalposts
Where does it say that religious understanding can't evolve? Religion isn't static and there has been fierce debate relating to the Bible for as long as it has existed, anon. Even on its own, the Catholic Church has a diverse set of theological schools within it.
Faith is good and respectable.
Christian chic is just as embarrassing at hardcore fedora tipping.
what do you mean by "He's" what do you mean by "trying" what do you mean by "to" what do you mean by "break" what do you mean by "the" what do you mean by "sentence" what do you mean by "down" what do you mean by "to" what do you mean by "make" what do you mean by "it" what do you mean by "less" what do you mean by "about" what do you mean by "absolutes" what do you mean by "so" what do you mean by "you" what do you mean by "can" what do you mean by "granulate" what do you mean by "and" what do you mean by "answer" what do you mean by "the" what do you mean by "question" what do you mean by "as" what do you mean by "smaller" what do you mean by "parts" what do you mean by "that" what do you mean by "serve" what do you mean by "to" what do you mean by "answer" what do you mean by "the" what do you mean by "proposed" what do you mean by "question." what do you mean by "This" what do you mean by "is" what do you mean by "not" what do you mean by "him" what do you mean by "having" what do you mean by "a" what do you mean by "melty." what do you mean by "Legitimately," what do you mean by "this" what do you mean by "is" what do you mean by "a" what do you mean by "good" what do you mean by "way" what do you mean by "to" what do you mean by "get" what do you mean by "someone" what do you mean by "to" what do you mean by "think" what do you mean by "about" what do you mean by "a" what do you mean by "problem" what do you mean by "when" what do you mean by "they" what do you mean by "can't" what do you mean by "see" what do you mean by "nuance."
t.
His operating system is the best one todate, that being said, his support of Netenyahu means his religion allows him to break Bread with Satan for a bountiful financial harvest.
A Religious man who able to avoid discouraging words for pure evil, has a pinhole of pure evil inside him, saved for just the situation where he believes that support of the man that's going to create a NWO on the levant will yield up a greater good for the majority of rightly acting people.
Still, this Christianity thing is at the very best a bio bootloader. All you can do is point at it and say: "That brought me to where I am, or I've been paid to say this, or maybe it's a little bit of both".
youtube.com
Jews tho!!!
Don't care.
Christcucks love their Jewish controlled opposition that promotes their chistcuck religion.
Lol, such NPCs
t.
Whole lot of bullshit to say "I'm actually afraid to say I'm a Christian". Wondering when his next Joe Rogaine appearance will be, so they can larp at each other and talk about God in pretentious vaguery.
People don't realise Peterson's "high verbal IQ word vomit retreat into semantics" is actually him trying to Mr. Miyagi you. He's teaching you the way he thinks rather than a direct answer to a question that isn't actually relevant to improving your life or reaching a collective truth. Showing the process rather than giving the answer.
"what do you mean by 'believe'?"
most people don't know what they even mean with the words they use, he won't "answer" because he wants to be genuinely precise with his speech to be in line with the Logos. he understands the importance of language and beleif deeper than most.
I think people take all these categorisations and semantics too literally. he's essetially saying; "it doesn't matter what you TELL yourself you believe, merely by existing and having a basic ethical code, you are unconsciously acting out Christian ethics and stories. God is the interplay between conscience and calling. The act of voluntary self sacrifice can be found in all religions, all the questions you ask as irrelevant to the actual POINT i'm trying to make, you're just trying to gotcha me for youtube clout because you're obsessed with discrediting my character from a preconceived bias woke mind virus."
it's also just temperament and levels of consciousness. like the Dawkins debate. if you don't get it, you just won't get it.
Peterson isn't a Christian. I don't know where you're getting this nonsense from.
I know he isn't
The intellectual elite of Canada.
Lazy meme, Peterson is a commie shill that worked for the UN to build globalism.
But you can do better.
What do you mean by "Eat" and "Breakfast" and "Morning"?
I mean that is a very deep question, MAN.
Now don't be a smart ass!
>Sniff's grandma's pubic hair
We're one or two generations away from glassing the planet over not understanding this concept.
Peterson is only this vague when asked about his religion or the lack thereof.
Jordan Peterson is a superposition of religions
I kind of see that, but I think he just got deep into a soup of comparative religion, jungian/myth analysis etc and understands the power of religions and traditional culture, but is still fundamentally a materialist and can't cross the divide. It isn't surprising after his weird benzo episode he ended up as a megazionist, that sort of disposition is close to the public face of jewry/zionism as it's largely a materialist religion with a more spiritual(demon worshiping) priestly class kept mostly out of sight. Oh the massive amount of $ probably helped get him there too.
Christianity is uncompromising. Christians demand that you believe in the whole shebang, or you’re out.
There is no audience (and no income) for a halfway house christian grifter.
I saw you in other threads, posting the exact same images and the exact same texts.
Really makes you think.
lol hes 35, look up dannyphiltalk
millennial twinks dont experience twink death
fatso pic
How the fuck does TJ have such thin legs relative to the rest of his body?
Was a bad debate. Those atheists were just trying to play "gotcha" games the entire time, and weren't interested in discussing the moral virtues of Christianity. They came there to ague "man in the sky bad" or "Your sky daddy doesn't exist". They were out of their league. And the problem with atheists in general, exemplified in this debate, is that they think being smug means being right.
But Peterson failed here because he's not a Christian. He doesn't believe in the divinity of Christ, how can he argue in defense of it? He tried to argue the morals, parables, lessons of Christianity, but the average atheist doesn't give a shit about those things. If Atheists were true objective observers, they would all be evolutionary darwinists, but instead, none of them are, and defer to modernity to guide their moral principles (which is why they're all pro-immigration, when, from a darwinist perspective, that's incredibly stupid and out of tune with reality). If Peterson isn't arguing the divine aspects of Christianity, then it's pointless to debate. You want to first provide evidence of nonlocal consciousness before you even start to delve into religious beliefs when talking with atheists. Only once you get an atheists to accept that you still exist after death, can you even start to discuss religion. If they refuse to accept that you exist after death, discussing religion is a 100% pointless exercise.
Gay..
Why is it an issue that he doesn't? For a redditor, of course, it is extremely important that everyone says "as an X, ..." because they can't tell whether they should agree with a statement unless the one saying it makes it clear that he's in their team.
yes but........ do you believe in God?
"I believe there is a way to accurately describe the known universe in such a way that you and many others would call it God".
I believe that there is an explanation to this universe that you would call "God", and others compelled to imitate you in pursuit of survival.
but... You've answered my question with a question that has even less substance.
I grow weary of your Palestinian Red Snake Satanic Slave-tenderizing operating system from Syriapalestina. Stop using me to lend credit to your Zionist Insurrection in America.
The irony of "ethical capital borrowed from Judeo-Christian metaphysics" is the fact that all the moral lessons of the Abrahamic holy books came from religions and cultures that preceded them. Mosaic Law was lifted from the Egyptians and Hammurabi's code.
There was a time in the infancy of our knowledge that we began keeping track of ideas, people and inventory. There was no other entertainment but religious dramas. The more magical, the more they spread. This is why most religious protagonists have the full set of god-like characteristics (miracle birth, healing, astronomical signs, followers, miracle death, able to leap tall buildings in a single bound, etc) Plagiarism was how tribes with inferior gods could really beef up their stories. The hero tales are re-writes from earlier stories. Now we know Noah was just a rehash of Gilgamesh, the NT stole the Prodigal Son parable from Buddha, etc. The economic lessons are purely Hebrew in origin, such as the Parable of the Talents
This is just an example of the hitler quote about arguing with jews lol
Isn't Juden Peterstein supposed to be the right's intellectual giant?
Nah, I think when he doesn't give a straight answer, he's avoiding the question. Completely.
He never gives a straight answer to any question of relevance. If they had asked;
Were you a professor in Canada?
Would peterson say; "What do you mean by "Profess"?"
No, he'd say "Yes or No".
So when he's asked if he's a Christian he sidesteps.
HE IS NOT A CHRISTIAN, but he doesn't want to say it. Egotistical.
What do you MEAN by define?
Define breakfast
I think he just expected more of those debating against him. They acted more like message board masterbaiters than debaters. In these environments, people typically are far more interested in building semantic traps and winning with a "gotcha!" than they are in getting to the essence of a subject and learning more about it. Honestly "define X" almost never belongs in arguments because language does not work that way. There is no reason to believe that any definition would be perfectly consistent and not result in a trap like "by your definition, you must believe in {pure retardation}!"
Penn Jillette
Lol, how's his daughter doing? Oh wait, sorry, his "son" lol.
Outer layer of nuts.
Unnecessary meal at beginning of day.
Claim one : atheists don't know what they're rejecting when they reject God.
Refuses to give a definition of God.
This guy is a jellylike slime that divides itself up and slips through your fingers.
Kind of. Dawkins says he's a Christian, but a cultural Christian. Professor has more of an objective dictionary definition.
Exactly right. Let's hollow out Christianity and refurbish it with gay modern ideas. Maybe that'll give em a veneer of moral authority.
A gay bar in a church.
Personally I saw a retarded 20 year old acting beligerant. Fairly typical of people that age. Peterson didn't want to deal with a retarded child. I get not liking Peterson but this is hardly the own you think it is.
the Bible is a hyperlinked library of wisdom across centuries. It’s not a book you simply “believe in.”
Ok cool so you have literally no opinion about whether the contents of the book is true or false
What an intelectual
Scrotum
is that peterson?
worship means to attend to
believe means to die for
The Bible is a blended text containing myth, poetry, history, and legal codes, anon. Asking if it's "true or false" is reductive.
Yeah, in a Halloween costume. Are you admiring his Soviet art collection? He began collecting it decades ago, he says he was drawn to the blend of technical skill and ideological messaging, and it turned out to be a great investment.
Don't you own any paintings? Not posters, lol, paintings?
Penn Jillette
Hilarious that this was the guy who prided himself in a career of debunking bullshit, and then went all in the Tranny cult and gave blessings on his troon "daughter".
Christian here. This is the same line of reasoning as the agnostic athiest, though. He clearly rejects the church's God. And he has subtly contradicted several almost universally held doctrines.
God's personhood
If you deny Christ he denies you
The saved were chosen before time, a Christian doesn't pop in and out of a state of grace, their name either is or isn't in the book of life.
That's what's upsetting to me. Anyone that teaches Christianity does so in clear terms and is interested in the learner's clear understanding of principles, it can get wordy, but it isn't this improvisational spirituality.
In summary.
Nigga that's nuts!
Define "nutshell"
A hard protective covering surrounding a plant's seed.
expecting me to actually believe in Jesus Christ instead of hiding behind ever-shifting walls of cynical cope as I pilfer the Christian corpus for sights and sounds in a desperate attempt to hide my total lack of inner life and inability to express a simple idea or concept without hysterically invoking the sweet waters of Apsu, Apollo of Alesia, Minerva Sulis, and Isis 15 times before turning on the waterworks is like turning the mass I never attend into a gay bar, or something
This is the kind of bullshit Dawkins was on about. He can't just answer the fucking questions, even when the question in simple and plain. He takes fucking ages to not end up saying anything and then his followers seal clap and say "my good so profound".
youtu.be
Two different men, pre-coma JBP and the present day brain injured JBP. It's tragic that his zero-charisma parasite of a daughter (aka manager) keeps pushing brain injured JBP into the limelight to make a fool of himself. Mikhaila is no different than Jill Biden trotting dementia Joe out there to get attention and money for herself. These women have no shame.
The bible makes explicit claims about the existence of a divine figure and demands subservience to him, as well as a series of historical claims.
Whether you accept the supernatural premise of the book is the entirety of what is meant by asking if the bible is true.
Using it as a historical source in the context of other sources and evidence means just treating it as a historical document, which is not what peterstein is advocating for.
You're juggling semantics to avoid engaging with the question
I'm the good jew
No I'm the good jew
You're both going down.
watching an alleged 'intellectual' consistently play dumb really hurts the image they're trying to portray.
like are you a PHd or a 6-year-old?
Memeflag
I always knew the effort against Peterson was done by shills he is a slayer of dragons, the top lobster. You are paid to shill on Anon Babble
For the 500th time, he was MK-Ultra'd in Russia during his detox. This explains his completely irrational responses to anything related to Jews and Israel. It is so obvious you don't even need an undergraduate in psychology to see it.
The man did great things for the youth of the world, but he had his limitations and he ignored them. He needs to withdraw from society, relax his mind and spirit, and return to himself.
She went from bed-ridden sickly shut-in to ambulatory millionaire basically overnight.
Not a very good life foundation set for her given she used that freedom to divorce a good man after having his child, date Tate, and now embarrasses herself on camera shilling for Israel.
Dawkins
See .
I'm not avoiding any question but rather rejecting the way you're attempting to frame the conversation. The Bible is a blended text containing myth, poetry, history, and legal codes. Asking if it's "true or false" is reductive. Furthermore, treating it as merely a historical document is also reductive.
Define "define"
I didn't watch this charade, but atheists are pretty much the dumbest people of all time. Edgelordylordism is what this is, and I really don't get it, I don't get the appeal for a person to reject the most basic truths and moral laws. That we live in a created world, an engineering masterpiece.
And what is wrong about not committing murder and adultery and theft and lies etc. what is their problem? Atheists really just love sin? They want to be homosexual liars, thieves and murderers? Is that what they want? A world without morality, just endles back and forth made up philosophical edgelordism and rebellious attitudes towards God while our fundamental law that makes our civilization possible is based on the law of God.
Define "nutshell", i'm not a nut, i'm not a shell. Your is assumption preposterous. Now wash your circumcised penis.
whats' the actual quote?
he's a leftist intellectual. alwasy has been.
what do you mean by stein
what do you mean by in
what do you mean by a
what do you mean by nut
what do you mean by shell
i aint playing games you evil psycho
Furthermore, treating it as merely a historical document is also reductive.
Why?
Either it is a historical document, or you accept on some level the metaphysical claims. Those are your choices.
The consequence of you just repeating "I reject le question ecks dee" is that you don't offer any alternative to that you dumb faggot. That's not winning, that's just the same as spamming "I accept your concession" after losing
He ate bedeviled eggs and Jungian side up.
Either it is a historical document, or you accept on some level the metaphysical claims
It's not just a historical document, as I pointed out in previous posts, and accepting metaphysical claims "on some level" is hardly a "true or false" question, anon.
you don't offer any alternative
You're trying to force a reductive take so that you can define others according to a simplistic understanding of the subject at hand, retard. The Bible is a complex book (a blended text that contains: myth, poetry, history, and legal codes) so asking if it's "true or false" is laughably retarded.
What do you mean by 'mean'?
I like the voxday clip talking about him
and accepting metaphysical claims "on some level" is hardly a "true or false" question, anon.
It literally is, and if you're suggesting it's not that means that to some extent you consider them true. There is literally no granularity between "all false" and "at least somewhat true"
The Bible is a complex book (a blended text that contains: myth, poetry, history, and legal codes) so asking if it's "true or false" is laughably retarded.
Legal codes, poetry and myth by definition aren't true. They represent something about the culture that spawned them but if you're suggesting they don't make a truth claim then that's obviously not a context in which the question applies.
Which leaves us with the history and if you're considering it to somehow be more than counterpart historical documents and evidence from the time then clearly you're grounding that in the metaphysical claims made by the text, which implicitly you are claiming are true.
You clearly understand that you've already lost the point. It's not that it's "too complex to be reduced to a simple question", it's that binding yourself to any specific opinion about the bible forces you to take a stance you aren't capable of defending. You want a priori for the bible to somehow sit above contemporaneous cultural works, religions and sources but you don't have any actual justification for doing so - so instead you just repeat "the question is absurd!" as if that somehow saves you from engaging with it.
I accept your concession, and eagerly await your complete refusal to engage with anything I said in your next reply.
image if some egyptian schizophrenic started discussing with you ethics of anubis and dignity of Amun-Ra? how would you react *other* than mockery?
Well, see, that’s not quite the question you think it is, and it certainly isn’t the question you think you’re asking, which, in itself, is a fascinating psycho-social phenomenon worth unpacking. Because when you say “Christian,” what precisely do you mean? Are we talking about the creedal formulations of Nicene orthodoxy, or are we invoking something more Jungian—an archetypal alignment with the logos that structures Being itself?
You see, I’m very hesitant to place myself in a box that has been so historically—and might I say metaphysically—flattened by centuries of institutionalization, doctrinal corruption, and, yes, Enlightenment rationalism, which, for all its merits, has severed us from the sacral substrate of narrative meaning. And so, to say “I am a Christian” is, in a certain sense, to reduce the richness of a multi-dimensional phenomenological experience to a mere label, which is precisely the kind of categorical reductionism that gave rise to totalitarian ideologies in the 20th century.
Moreover, if we interpret Christ not merely as a historical figure—but as the personification of the transcendent logos, the metaphysical principle through which chaos is ordered into habitable being—then the question becomes less about whether I believe in Christ and more about whether I act in accordance with that incarnated pattern of meaning. And that is not a yes or no question. That is a lifelong wrestling with Being, like Jacob with the angel, which itself is a symbolic template for the moral striving of the individual across time.
So am I a Christian? Well, I strive to live as if God exists, which I believe is the highest ethical commitment a person can make in this fragmented postmodern wasteland. But whether I am one, in the propositional sense, as though that could be answered like a census checkbox—well, that’s precisely the kind of binary framework that collapses the mystery of Being into bureaucratic banality.
P.S.
That's not winning, that's just the same as spamming "I accept your concession" after losing
I accept your concession
Lol
Ridiculous hypothetical. The definition is implied
pseud, and 0 chance you avoid blending synthetic fabrics with organic
I accept your concession
He could have said that and then explained his stance on the ostensibly fact-based portions that people insist we live by.
blending synthetic fabrics with organic
spamming "I accept your concession" after losing
What do you think he means by “myth”?
not engaging with any arguments
Don't worry anon, I accept you[r concession]
The leaf is copy pasting chatgpt
That would make sense, but I guess even chatGPT is too tilted now to continue
He could have said that
Given the constraints of the format he pretty much did. It's not his fault if you don't listen and can'r extrapolate (and if you wish to be aggressively opinionated on the subject matter, like pretty much everyone ITT, you should do the minimal amount of work it takes to understand).
explained his stance on the ostensibly fact-based portions
You can easily derive such based on his answer. The problem is fedora tippers are lazy and tend to parrot the same arguments they've heard other fedora tippers make (like the retard above tipping about blended fabrics, lol).
he pretty much said that
In other words, he didn’t say that and you’re trying to make it look like he did.
juden always hated elmo because of jelousy
elmo made it big while he just cried on tv trying to make enough for his next benzo fix
I did engage with your arguments, anon. You can't respond and started spamming "I accept your concession" after saying retards who spam "I accept your concession" tacitly admit they're BTFO, lol.
Cope harder, memeflag.
In other words
It's all there even in the limited format of the debate, anon. If you're filtered by someone as easy to understand as Peterson it say a lot more about you than it does about him.
what do you mean by "Two" what do you mean by "different" what do you mean by "men," what do you mean by "pre-coma" what do you mean by "JBP" what do you mean by "and" what do you mean by "the" what do you mean by "present" what do you mean by "day" what do you mean by "brain" what do you mean by "injured" what do you mean by "JBP." what do you mean by "It's" what do you mean by "tragic" what do you mean by "that" what do you mean by "his" what do you mean by "zero-charisma" what do you mean by "parasite" what do you mean by "of" what do you mean by "a" what do you mean by "daughter" what do you mean by "(aka" what do you mean by "manager)" what do you mean by "keeps" what do you mean by "pushing" what do you mean by "brain" what do you mean by "injured" what do you mean by "JBP" what do you mean by "into" what do you mean by "the" what do you mean by "limelight" what do you mean by "to" what do you mean by "make" what do you mean by "a" what do you mean by "fool" what do you mean by "of" what do you mean by "himself." what do you mean by "Mikhaila" what do you mean by "is" what do you mean by "no" what do you mean by "different" what do you mean by "than" what do you mean by "Jill" what do you mean by "Biden" what do you mean by "trotting" what do you mean by "dementia" what do you mean by "Joe" what do you mean by "out" what do you mean by "there" what do you mean by "to" what do you mean by "get" what do you mean by "attention" what do you mean by "and" what do you mean by "money" what do you mean by "for" what do you mean by "herself." what do you mean by "These" what do you mean by "women" what do you mean by "have" what do you mean by "no" what do you mean by "shame."
the moral virtues of Christianity.
Which bible verse should I abide to sell my daughter into slavery?
Exodus 21:7-11
7 “When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. 8 If she does not satisfy her owner, he must allow her to be bought back again. But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her. 9 But if the slave’s owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave but as a daughter.
10 “If a man who has married a slave wife takes another wife for himself, he must not neglect the rights of the first wife to food, clothing, and sexual intimacy. 11 If he fails in any of these three obligations, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment.
what do you mean by ">do you believe in the Bible?"
what do you mean by ">the Bible is a hyperlinked library of wisdom across centuries. It’s not a book you simply “believe in.”"
what do you mean by ">so you don't take it literally?"
what do you mean by ">literalism is a modern distortion. Stories operate on multiple planes of reality."
what do you mean by ">you're avoiding the question."
what do you mean by ">i’m challenging its premises."
what do you mean by ">are you saved?"
what do you mean by ">i think the idea of salvation is psychological, social, and metaphysical."
what do you mean by ">so you're not saved?"
what do you mean by ">i'm working on aligning myself with the Logos."
what do you mean by ">is that a yes?"
what do you mean by ">it's a process, not a status."
what do you mean by ">do you believe in Heaven and Hell?"
what do you mean by ">we live them out psychologically. Every day."
what do you mean by ">that’s not what the Bible says."
what do you mean by ">well, the Bible isn’t a manual. It’s a narrative architecture of meaning."
what do you mean by ">are you afraid of going to Hell?"
what do you mean by ">i’m more afraid of becoming the kind of person who belongs there."
what do you mean by ">do you think atheists can be moral?"
what do you mean by ">that depends what you mean by “moral,” and whether they're standing on borrowed ethical capital."
what do you mean by ">borrowed from what?"
what do you mean by ">from Judeo-Christian metaphysics. From millennia of cultural evolution."
what do you mean by ">so they’re moral, but for the wrong reasons?"
what do you mean by ">they’re moral, but they don’t know why."
what do you mean by ">so you’re better than them?"
what do you mean by ">no, but I may be more aware of the foundations."
what do you mean by ">so why not just say you're a Christian?"
what do you mean by ">because I’m not willing to trivialize that claim."
what do you mean by ">Fedoras mad."
how did he make a career out of not using trannies new pronouns back when they were trying to make that a thing? I listened to him talk about issues not related to tranny bs back then and he sounded retarded using big words to sound intelligent that were completely unnecessary in the context of his sentences.
I did engage with your arguments, anon
Literally every single reply was "I reject the question"
That's the opposite of engagement
My next reply will cost 2 (you)s
Me personally? I'd be interested in hearing why they think what they think. Mockery is usually done by low info people as a sidestep of arguments (because they have none).
Christianity specifically is the new testament.
There's no slavery in the west right now because we have machines and cheap immigrant labour instead. That's literally the only reason, not because the west suddenly woke up to a new liberal morality. Get a clue.
Listen, anon. It's not my fault you're filtered by very simple points because you've only trained yourself to parrot fedora fad soundbites. I laid out how you were framing the conversation, told you why I rejected the way you were framing the conversation, and presented an alternative framing that demonstrated the poverty of your nonsense while building a counterargument. Some people, like yourself, can't contextualize new information as it arises because they're retarded NPCs who follow a script they've internalized.
Instead of conflating being a fedora tipper with being intelligent maybe you should have read a few books. Instead of watching hours of fedora debates maybe you should have tried to develop a personality. You just aren't that bright, anon. Sorry to break it too you but you took a bad shortcut and deserve to be laughed at. Crying about your betters won't change that.