But (You) wont, you don't want to take it to the supreme court you want to continue to misinterpret it, scream about the constitution, while simultaneously violating it on a daily basis. (You) hate America and everything it represents.
SOURCE: congress.gov
That isn't law. Those are not the words that passed by Congress and signed by the president. It's a post hoc interpretation by the author, but it doesn't represent the interpretation by the rest of Congress at the time, the president, nor the courts.
TAKE IT TO THE SUPREME COURT
but (You) wont
Anchor babies are not us
Correct.
Reminder that (You) do not want this to go to the Supreme Court because (You) will lose. So you want to stall as long as possible so the Supreme Court never has to make a decision, (You) are a coward, (You) hate America and everything it represents.
It doesn't require the supreme court. The lower courts have set the precedence that anchor babies are citizens. SCOTUS has never opted for judicial review. In order to change status quo, Trump would need to take it to the supreme court.
This is a CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION it is the DUTY of the SUPREME COURT to INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION and (You) know how they will rule because the intent is not only clear it was also written down in official congressional record for all to read - ANCHOR BABIES ARE NOT US CITIZENS.
Are your parents siblings?
You have no arguments
concession accepted
My argument was here
You never addressed it. Checkmate, retard. I win again.
Precedent was set in 1866 Trump has already taken his EO to the Supreme Court and they WILL rule on May 15th that the lower courts and the George Soros Activist Judges will be overruled by the Supreme Court. The EO will go into effect as Trumps lawyers work this through the courts until it hits the Supreme Court.
Again... (You) desperately do NOT want to this to go to the Supreme Court because (You) know (You) are wrong and that the justices will rule in favor of the White House. This is why you want to stall in the lower courts for as long as possible.
Doesn't matter there is zero political will to revoke citizenship of the brown hoards and even less for the removal of all illegals. The goverment is full of traitors, cowards and theives.
Once a shitskin enters the west it's like home-based. Unless blood starts flowing it's over.
There is ENORMOUS political will to do this and it is what Trump got elected on and why he controls the House and the Senate. There is near 90% support in the US for deporting illegal migrants especially the violent ones.
Nigger the support for removal has been there since Ragen politicians don't give a fuck what the plebs think. The most you'll get is a little tax cut.
There doesn't need to be any new rulings. Longstanding laws have large criminal penalties for helping illegals. Life in prison if one you helped ends up murdering someone. So where are the indictments then? That's all it would take. Indict some landlords, employers, activists, local officials and this problem starts fixing itself. Without jobs or homes they will leave. They're not scared refugees, that's bullshit. They are opportunists and they have homes to go back to
Still here puto
me la pelas guey
o algo
That isn't law. Those are not the words that passed by Congress and signed by the president. It's a post hoc interpretation by the author, but it doesn't represent the interpretation by the rest of Congress at the time, the president, nor the courts.
It's absolutely the LAW. SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES is clear as a bell. What other meaning could it be?
Liberals will lose this, just as they lost the immunity nonsense, that No one is above the law - guess what Presidents ARE THE LAW.
Oh it's going to SCOTUS to remove your lies.
ANCHOR BABIES ARE NOT US CITIZENS.
Correct.
The MSM invented this lie.
Reminder that (You) do not want this to go to SCOTUS because (You) know you will LOSE!
unlucky for you, the 14th amendment exists, and it literally states that all persons born in the united states are citizens
just another consequence of slavery, what a colossal fuckup
removes all doubt
does no such thing. is an Englishman that went to america foreigner? is that the case now still? when did it stop being the case? and is it right to retroactively remove all foreigners from america leaving only indian tribes there.
The only thing that amendment got right was making the Bill of Rights apply equally throughout the entire country. No privileged religion, no gun control. Old West was the best.
Incorrect, it does not state that and I have provided the authors clarifying that in real time as my evidence. (You) have no argument.
The 1923 indian citizenship act still uses 'indian'
why dont the jeets invoke that for citizenship?
Why are leftists so eager to literally die on this hill?
Illegal aliens are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States which is why you can arrest them. Unless you want to claim illegals have diplomatic immunity
Courts would definitely allow them to
No, legal immigrants are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
Illegal border hoppers are still subject to the foreign power from which they originated from.
Illegal aliens are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States
No they are not. They are not US Citizens.
I've worked at the border, lived at the border and know that women who are ready to give birth come across so their babies are US citizens. No one wants that except people fucked in the head.
This also includes temporary work visa holders and green card holders who are NOT citizens.
lol lying cunt. you dont live on the border. can you get me some nice coca caina hahahaha
I would love to see the world fall apart in 2025
the satanic panic has nearly revived in normie circles
I've worked at an ICE Detention Center and Ports of Entry. I'm an eye witness.
so if an illegal immigrant murders someone in the US, do they get arrested by US law enforcement because they have committed a crime under US law, which they are subject to, or does local law enforcement just throw up their arms and defer to the illegal's home country for dealing with that?
(You) really don't want to take this to SCOTUS
I'm sure you can look this up yourself, being a big boy.
federal constitution doesn't define citizen
Oh, those wily "founders".
some senator lied about a law so it must be true
Wow, i love taking politicians at their word now. The whole congress just forgot to include the important bits for no reason
It'll be applied retroactively too. I don't think we will mass deport them, but they won't be able to vote. Kinda like how Mexico does it
Illegal migrants must pay taxes and follow the law, that being said, they are not entitled due process and other rights American citizens enjoy.
Dont like it? Then leave! Dont come to America.
How did you scan the 38th Congressional text? Isn't it like 5000 pages?