Is reverse colonization justified?

Is reverse colonization justified?

'member when colonization meant mass imigration?

Colonization is essentially seizing control of a foreign land. It does not really matter through which means it is achieved.

As usual for pea brained brownies, they think it's about the flag and not teaching people to read and count and not eat their literally just born children as was documented on more than one occasion in Africa, pre-colonization.
In short, of your recolonization brought that kind of boon, instead of being a shoddily disguised cash grab, then I'd be more willing to hear you out

Being colonized by Whites is an upgrade. Being colonized by brownoids is a downgrade.

This meme is also true in the reverse. Blacks/browns cry forever about colonization then flood every indigenous white country on earth. We don't care about your gaslighting anymore, white people are entering our DGAF era.

No it essentially is not that.
Essentially.
Essentially you are essentially an moron.
Essentially.

Here made it into a meme.

One was attempting to uplift mudpeople into civilization

The other is subhumans ruining said civilization

Wow you are fucking one retarded subhuman aren't you?

Wamen physical security

LOL!

>One was attempting to uplift mudpeople into civilization

commit genocide, subjugate those who live

use the natives as salve labour, exploit them for financial gain

take control over all of their land

make them have no rights and no say in government

drill into them that they are inferior and nothing more than simpletons who should be happy with being oppressed for the benefit of assholes who hate them

Going to have to disagree with you on that it was "uplifting" them

Yes... the Hispanic Empire had ZERO colonies.

Destroy England. Protect Spain.

Morally? No.
In the context of humans still just being warring monkey tribes? Yeah.

teaching people to read and count

Hispanics did that, the only good white is a dead one

Blas de Lezo killed countless whites (north europeans).

Kek, it’s true you can’t win. I remember a satire blog about urban pioneers in some shitty Brooklyn neighborhood.

You are a retarded gypsie, kike or something, hispanics from Europe like whites more than niggers or arabs or kikes. Remember Reconquista?

No.
It justifies colonizing them to begin with. Because all they've done is infiltrate our countries to commit crimes against our people, exploit our government benefits or both;
While we established industry, universities, hospitals, sanitation etc.
We create they destroy.

I don't want Europeans to get killed and raped.

Europe makes good Techno music

Modern colonizers come to work and contribute.
Europeans cam to plunder, kill and exploit.

These things really aren't comparable.

No. Europe made the places they colonized better. Browns being imported by jews just enshittifies everything.

Techno music.

That shit is easy to produce, garbage tier EDM music.

Whites bring modern technology and higher living standards. Browns bring poverty and the third world

When europe civilized savages with roads, railways, schools and hospitals, it's called colonization.
But in reverse, when they bring crimes, low IQs, cursed genetic, backward culture and superstition, it's called immigration.

one was taken through direct conquest, the other through political treachery. I hope this clears it up for you.
also, all the flags are wrong in your secon picture, it should be israeli flag every time.

nice cope ahmed
these people are low class plebs
by no means do they control anything here

Having the state protect you from us doesn't make you strong retard. You're just a tool.

I'm sure that's the red*it marxist education they gave you , yes.

You will never feel its magic...

I wouldn't wish a turk on my worst enemy.

Does it really matter how you do colonization exactly? Its the result that matters.

Fully committed to the Jewish agenda I see.

Well, it did help me get here. So, yeah. I support it.

One brings civilization, the other one brings mass rapes of underage women.
Oh wait, I don't care about women at all ahahahahahaa bring them in!

Say it louder golem.

Can't we all just get along?!

Who's responsible for "immigration?" The white-controlled state. If you're a white who utterly can't come to grips with that, or think you "can't say that," then you're the same brainless filth you say immigrants are. You're stupid and easy to control. You're simple minded.

Why waste your braincells on techno when you got eurobeat, industrial metal, hard bass, drum & bass?: youtube.com/watch?v=QiFBgtgUtfw
(estonian crew, not Russian just making memes.)

Why wouldn't I support a system that benefits me?

So long as you don't rattle your cage and do as you're told golem.

The First Reconquista (against muslims) and the Second Reconquista (against anglos) are a testament that WESTERN (Hispanic-Latino-Hellenic) CIVILIZATION is angelical.

South africa and rhodesia remembers

Who's responsible for "immigration?"

Capitalism in part but also jews brainwashed white boomers with multiculturalism for decades through propaganda.

Hispanics are med civilization, not western. (Anglo/French/German.) That's German. (Without kikes.)

No, because it's done by underhanded means rather than by right of conquest

western

LMAOOOOO... WESTERN CIVILIZATION was literally created by Greek, then continued by Romans, and taken to the zenith by Hispanics.

pic rel

How many millions of 100% black africans became anglos/french/germanics?

As long as it works

It hasn't worked yet, at least not here

Muh greeks/romans.

Wrong, when white civilization was peaking they were taken over by the Ottomans, lmao, rope.

Exactly. Curious how its former colonists getting the most migrants. Almost like karma hitting hard.

Germany wasn't really a colonial power, and Portugal and Spain her next to mm migrants

Where were Sweden's colonies?

Sweden is like 90% Swedish and Germany is about 85% German or so. But ultimately, if Sweden wants to stop accepting migrants, they can do so. Nobody is guilting them into this.

Nobody is guilting them into this.

LMAO. You are right in one way though. People do want to stop accepting migrants, and even kick out quite a few of them. The tide is turning. People are sick to death of your bullshit. The biggest obstacle between us isn't the state really, but an army of white cucks that simp for you. That army is shrinking because you are extremely awful people and not even they can stomach it.

Africans don't come to Europe to build railroads to extract metals efficiently. They come to leech off welfare. Big difference

Sure, two weeks.

The gears don't grind that quickly.

'Reverse colonization' is like 'reverse racism'. It doesn't exist as a separate concept. The modifier ('reverse') is just propaganda to stop you thinking about the problem correctly. Control language, control thought.

Maybe two more years or two more decades. Two more centuries at most.

Whites were working together with Ottomans and Jews to attack the Hispanic Empire:
Anglo-Ottoman alliance (starting in 16th century commerce against the Hispanic Empire)
Franco-Ottoman alliance (starting in 16th century militarism against the Hispanic Empire)
Germanic-Ottoman alliance (starting in 16th century politics against the Hispanic Empire)

Protestants, after committing the 1525 genocide against 500,000 germans, immediately oriented themselves into allowing the muslims a free passage towards Europe so Hispanics would weaken themselves fighting alone. See the Turco-Calvinism as one example, also this from the wiki:

The Ottoman Empire supported the early Protestant churches and contributed to their survival in dire times. Martin Luther regarded the Ottomans as allies

Sooner that that. Our next general election in 2029 will be interesting.

This of course assuming Labour make it to 2029 which is not assured.

Yeah, we (Slavs) had the same thing with whites constantly aligning against us. I like Meds, they are great guys and usually pleasant to be around. Been to Spain and Italy a few times and those are some of my beloved countries.

Not only justified, it's imperative

Womens physical security

There was a time you'd be laughed out of here for posting such a cringe simp image
Unfortunately this place has declined because of faggot unit 8200 kikes like you though I suppose that makes you happy

Why did you need the state to colonize africa?
Not expecting you to give a serious answer dw
But if you think about it, you'll see the answer is not so different

LOL, being enslaved and having your resource stolen is not an upgrade.

Africans didn't know they had resources. They were just chilling in their mud huts.

Amazing what deranged feminists 100% of whites are.

Any specific crimes against Slavs by the whites?

For example, I know the Treaty of Trianon is still one of the most humiliating things that anglos did against Hungary.

41% of the current generation of Germans are not ethnic European anon. They are not 80% German
And every 1/3 Swede has an immigrant parent. They are at most 75% Swedish.

Why tf do you care about Europe bro. Those cucks obviously don’t want to save themselves. The redpilled ones will just come here when the muzzies take over.

wymyn's physical security

:^3

I suppose Brest-Litovsk by Germans. It was essentially worse than Versailles. Not like I hate them for it, but its there.

No.

No you dumb nigger

Shitskins are never justified

British colonisation:

lets build cities using the resources that the hunter gatherers don't know how to harvest/use and slowly incorporate the savages into being human

Reverse colonisation:

lets money launder and do crime and generally make the already-built cities infinitely shitter

Yeah after looking at it this way, it is kind of justified, you're right

It's not even reverse colonization considering most people Europeans colonized cease to exist within a short period of time of them arriving.

It's what Europeans themselves admitted to.

Damn, I didn't realise India was fake

The people who were actually involved are long dead and they would not admit to wrongdoing if they were alive. The people you are referring to were fed a white guilt narrative in college and they can't admit jack shit.

Is reverse colonization justified?

Colonization was creating civilization
Reverse colonization is destroying civilization

Everything is justified if you win.
You even get to write your own history to justify it to other people.
If you lose now, or later down the line, you become bad and your actions are unjustified.

The "save yurop" guys are justified in whining about it.
People being mad and/or scared while spreading awareness about it is necessary if something is actually to be done to "save yurop".

All in all, your thread is worthless just like 98% of the catalog always is.

COPE

Why is everything that anglos created a shithole or a slaughterhouse? (usually both)

the white man must give up their colonies so the natives can benefit from thier own countries' wealth

wait, why are our countries still shit?

the white man must allow millions of former colonials to move into their countries and parasitize them

Bunch of faggots.

Is reverse colonization justified?

no one ever thought the british empire was based

yes

underrated post

Yes, it does. Colonization is forcibly seizing a control through warfare that is very often genocidal. Immigration is not warfare. It is the genetic makeup of a country changing naturally and organically. That is not something that happens forcibly, and unless you're a white supremacist, it is very much not an act of ethnic cleansing.

Absolutely fucking hilarious who you're crying and bitching about cannibalism in Africa when Africa is one of the biggest strongholds of Christianity in the world. Racists like you were crying "voodoo sacrifice rituals" over all the Haitians in Springfield when in actuality they saved the local Church from closing because the only local regular left was a 75 year old white woman. Yet, apparently, our cultures are incapable for some strange reason. I wonder what that reason is.

Do you prefer a violent colonization attempt? You pussy-out from even the peaceful one. Lmao. You pussy out from calling a nigger a nigger.
Amerikans are cowards.

Russia attempted to rise you Oinkranians out of the mud during Soviet rule.
Indeed, the only goodvtime you ever had Was when you were Malorossya. (You are still little Russia, your "language" is just a dialect of Russian and you have no other culture than what Russia gave you)
Surrender now.

Based and TRUTH-pilled.
Gott strafe England.

The mud people were just fine without civilization. Even your ancestors were at one time fine without it, until they were coerced into joining it.

You are not white, Finngolian. Your retarded language has less speakers than Nahuatl (and itbus even more useless and retarded)

Deliberate demographic replacement is literally genocide.

France

Women physically secure

Shiggy diggy.

I said most not all dumbass. Notice all those diverse Native American and Australian Aboriginal groups that no longer exist. Haitian natives don't even exist anymore because of the handiwork of European trash. And that's just one example.

Become the 51st state, then you Hortonigger

Bro wtf happened to Germany?

Two wrongs don't make a right.
Then again, let he without sin cast the first stone.

Unironically i don't care about angloids and frenchcucks, but why nordic countries?, they didn't have colonies in the shithole called Africa.

Jesus you're retarded. Do you also blame the mongols for wiping out 1/3rd of the human population?

it's not a resource if you don't know it exists or what to do with it.
can't steal gas and oil from siberian elk

Yes why wouldn't I if their actions led to their death's dumbass? Difference between Mongols and Europeans is that Mongols didn't invade nearly the entire planet and create power structures or institutions that have done harm to various societies even to this day.

Colonialism is good because it is a race in which the strong conquer.
Interbreeding, which comes from compassion, is bad because it is carried out with difficulty by the magnanimity of the strong.

One of them happened through armed force while the other is happening because our nations have the kike AIDS. It's just not the same.

Nigger look up the mongol empire by land area. And then realise that I talked about them deliberately spreading the Black death.

Colonisation

Won no war entering said country

Cried and begged to be "asylum seeker"

was helped by british people

now claim to be the new colonisers taking over europe

non whites are fucking faggots kek

Yes they did sweetie, google nordic colonialism

Just because Social Darwinism is valid doesn't mean I appreciate its effects.

No, it isn't justified, its a globalist satanic plot to deprive the world of European Christendom, the most righteous of all societies formed by man

You're a shit skin mutt sub human so it really doesn't matter what you think or say.

Implying I would approve of either

As a nationalist it is infinitely better to focus on your own nation's issues than do some silly colonization project for the benefit of the country elite whether it be private or bureaucrat owned.

First one never happened.
Niggers flying a French flag are still niggers.
Niggers invading your homes are still niggers.

europeans

spread the enlightenment and industrial revolution wherever they went

third worldies

rape children and shit in the streets

they are not comparable