Is Blackpill related to looks compatible with POL?

I agree 99% with the zeitgeist of this board but I have seen many comments insulting incels, the blackpill and the importance of looks in men.

What is the reason for the hate? Surely in the western world blackpill is present everywhere so why the scorn?

Nice ass, gay dance

endgame of blackpill is trooning out

thread 10^n about women's rights destroying civilization

80% of zoomers are missing on it too

I only like seeing women dancing in bikinis when they're poor and desperate women from places like r/povertyfinance and r/suicidewatch livestreaming themselves reluctantly dancing and trying on different outfits for me.

Imagine you have a database table with a trillion examples describing people, and tens of thousands of columns expressing various qualities about the person row such as but not limited to strength, speed, looks, etc.

Also assume the examples completely explore every single range of every column, said another way, they are evenly and uniformly distributed so that you can find anything you want, but the cells were defined more or less randomly, and some rows are mutually exclusive to other rows, such as $strength $intelligence, and $speed, you can only get one, but not the other one, for obvious reasons, the strongest person isn't the fastest person.

I give you the option to make as many rank_order() methods as you like to separate which one is best. You give me your choices and I short-list this way:

select * from person order by strength desc, intelligence desc, speed desc, looks desc, etc limit 10;

You get ten rows but you're unhappy because your first criteria contain the strongest people to have ever lived and therefore the next two properties are below the median.

So again you re-order your asserts:

select * from person order by looks desc, speed desc, strength desc, etc limit 10;

Again you're even more unhappy, you're staring in the face of the most hypnotizing intoxicating fairy to have ever lived, but now it has below median on strength, speed, int, etc.

When ever you rank order a population by a thing, everything else that thing is remotely inverse correlated with, such as but not limited to intelligence and speed, goes below the median, and if you try to get clever and rank order after a sum, you're still failed because you have not correctly expressed the variable skew in the decay function for when strength starts decaying from intelligence. Which is opposite decay, from 100 to 115 than it is from increasing IQ 75 to IQ 95.

If you find the hottest hottie in the world and wonder: "Why these bitches be fucking crazy"? well you can meditate on the post, you want "not crazy" high up in your rank order, which forces you to take a loss on intelligence, speed, strength, etc.

In my 50 years of looking, here are your best criteria, since weighted-sums are hard, you gotta be with the person 3 years to see the weighted sum, short and skinny:

select * from person order by NotCrazy desc, SmartEffective descending, Hot descending.

The not crazy and the smart join forces as she ages, and compensates for hot.

I could crush their skulls with my bare hands

The smell

Yeah, it's as if it was a consistently correct statement or something.

it's like this board is constantly being slid by bullshit coombait threads that the jannies do nothing about

I didn't miss out on clubbing, it was always shit.
Not enough. It must be 100% of Anon Babble all the time.

What the HECK

OH MY GOD I MUST LOOK DECENT TO GET A GIRLFRIEND THIS MUST BE BECAUSE OF DA JOOOOZ

CHUDICHUD.jpg - 207x243, 17.16K

kek based coomer

Imagine you're doing a random forest and the bish doesn't understand the concept of a regression to the mean. There are many 130+ IQ giga-chads out there that maybe had otter bods in high school from tennis or something but they are still passed over because some plutocrat's son also had +30 training skill in everything besides int because if he had to have int he wouldn't have made it to Harvard-Yale Baby College.
t. dying braincel
P.S. Too many of a certain group of people on this site. It's been bad since 2013.

3D women can be fairly grotesque

Thanks

One hit wonder rapper releases mildly popular song 30 years ago. Now the entire culture of the US is centered around asses. Having a giant ass and shaking it is the basis of western civilization at this point

ever since becoming Anon Babble I am no longer attracted to women like that.
look at how flabby she is. she might not be fat yet, but everything wobbles when she moves, she is completely untrained.
obesity is only a matter of time for her.

What is the reason for the hate?

People who haven't accept the blackpill yet are still coping and trying to tell themselves that it will be their turn any moment now, and they don't want to hear the truth.

your body is your temple for worship of God. Despair is no reason to defile it. It results in poor discipline and at that point you are no better than a nigger

She has a flat jew ass. Why is everyone performatively wowing at her 'huge bedonkadonk?' It looks like two cubes robotically shifting back and forth.

Built for BBC

I seriously cannot get over the mental block of having a daughter.
Imagine raising your little girl to be an upstanding and proper women and she ends up wearing revealing bikinis to parties, shakes their ass for strangers to slap around, takes cocks from a dozen men in all her holes over a few years, or god forbid she falls for the bbc meme and taints herself forever.
I want a daughter so bad but the possibilities she becomes a degenerate roastie is too much to bear.

IMG_9850.png - 646x1284, 162.58K

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

WOMEN THREADS ARE NOT POLITICAL

The blackpill is a cringe term. And terms like "it's over" ruin it's image. The core of the ideology is correct. Looks ARE the single most important thing when it comes to attracting the opposite sex.

t.

5e371g.jpg - 207x250, 20.73K

what you missed on.webm

You can just go to a foam party. You know that, right? You can just buy a ticket to Shagaluf or Napa and walk right in.

Solid 0/10

What is the reason for the hate?

"Facts and logic" has convinced precisely 0 people in the history of ever. Most men want to cling to any hope, no matter how marginal, rather than be right and so temporarily become black (in the racial sense) rather than blackpilled when exposed to it.

26.webm - 1920x1080, 1.74M

Remove hypergamy and mid men can suddenly get mid women.
So yes, it's becuase of their subversion.

Hypergamy is a function of natural selection, not da jooz.

select * from person order by NotCrazy desc, SmartEffective descending, Hot descending.

gay detected

Yes they are. The Woman Question is the uttermost relevant political topic in the West.

That's why we have society, you inbred retard. And no, that's not what natural selection is.

select * from person order by strength desc, intelligence desc, speed desc, looks desc, etc limit 10;

Hmmm.... my SQL is rusty, but sorting can only be done by ONE main column IIRC.

You should be put to death for posting cringe

And terms like "it's over" ruin it's image

But it IS over

sexual selection is not a vector for natural selection

Really? How fucking stupid are you?

I don't know why women insist on shaking their stinky bottoms at men. Shake your tits ffs, ain't got no time for shitholes.

Women who can shake their ass without looking like they're trying to take a dump are really rare. There is only one of them on this video.

Natural selection would be men taking what they want with force, imbecile.
Not some deranged feminist society like we have because of jewish subversion.

Having a second monitor would have saved him

Kind of saggy considering she isn't particularly old.

Checked

The looks thing is just a symptom of online dating and women not being quite as horny so it takes a 9-10/10 to make them interested if all they're getting is a pic and a short blurb. If you're a normal guy you really need to stop trying online dating and meet women through normal social occasions.

You do go on those, right?

Left ass is a nice ass. Middle and right ass are like two pure bone skeletons, they need meat.

Looks are key. Women are animals. If there's no physical attraction it won't work unless you're very rich. Redpill is to stop wearing deodorant, it works to get women

i wonder how many different penis they took during the 3 day festival.

Because women were (wrongly) granted any modicum of power and were told (again, wrongly) that they are indeed equal to men. However, a purely physical analysis proves this false with surgical precision, and any psychological analysis absolutely dismantles this argument. Women, on average, do not have physical superiority, or even parity, to that of a man. We have much more muscle mass, bone density, lung capacity, etc. than women.
Psychologically, we think different. Men can hash things put with words for the most part. Women, however, cannot, especially with the physical disadvantage, so they resort to manipulation. The thing is, however, that all you have to do is tell them "No". "No", you arent equal to me, in fact your far inferior to me intellectually, emotionally, and physically, and as such it is right and correct to impose my will upon you as it would likely have a better outcome than what feminism has granted to you.

Yeah? Which primate species operate that way?

Female primates are more selective than males, dipshit, and that's literally what hypergamy is. That's because I can impregnate as many women as I can be bothered to nut in and bail afterward. Meanwhile, they can only pump out one sprog per year and this requires an enormous physiological investment on their part.

Holy fuck you're dumb.

my gf said she doesn't care about my money and only likes me because of my "good genetics". i'm not even Chad though maybe ChadLite.

You do go on those, right?

of course not you moron, nobody does them. everybody's inside staring into the nightmare rectangle.

Women are animals

Some more so than others

Yeah? Which primate species operate that way?

Indians?

The Andrew Wilson argument

The issue with the "monopoly on force" argument is a woman can simply manipulate men to enforce her will for her. It turns out they're really fucking good at this; that's why women can vote despite having no obligations to society, and they have more legal protections than you do.

impose muh will

Yeah, women are better educated and far more influential than men are at this point, so you'd be chimping out while the state enforcement arm turns you into Swiss cheese on their behalf.

nigger past time

pass
also, if women don't want you it means you've failed as a man. better luck next time.

Yeah? Which primate species operate that way?

Ours, retard. Since the dawn of times before civilization. After that we had patriarchy which made sure to give a wife to every man to make sure we have a steady and increasing population.
Now we have feminism which makes sure to result is sterile hypergamy.

you gotta be with the person 3 years to see

This is an important point. Maybe not 3 years, but long enough to get through some of the layers of their lies. The hands down most insane woman I've ever known has a near flawless facade that she uses to trick all sorts of men. She's a cluster B and her entire existence is saying and doing whatever it takes to get attention from guys she wants attention from. Lying is just one of her tools. Morality plays no role, she's a genuine psychopath.

Exactly.
I don't see how manipulation renders the argument false. And by the way, it's not women's manipulation, it's Jews manipulation with the support of incredibly developed technology. This would have never happened 100 years ago. Having a smartphone in your pocket is like having a Jew in your pocket.

a woman can simply manipulate men to enforce her will for her

There's generally no need for "manipulation" as straight men have a sexual outgroup preference. Men who think they don't are lying to themselves, either about not having it or being straight.

vaginal jews.jpg - 680x572, 174.72K

hypergamy never existed before

... What?

After that we had patriarchy which made sure to give a wife to every man

Haha, what? You have twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors; the majority of males that have lived did not marry or reproduce and we've had prolonged periods in history where 1 man produced for every 20 women. These facts are coded into your genetics - you're talking complete nonsense.

I don't see how manipulation renders the argument false.

Because it's a competing vector to enforce their worldview. You're complaining that their worldview predominates. It follows, then, that their vector is more effective than yours.

it's da joooooz!

Hypergamy predates Judaism. It predates humanity.

You have twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors

I know what you were trying to refer to but what you actually wrote suggests that you, personally, do actually have male ancestors that occupy more than one spot in your family tree

Path of exile figured this out very well. You want a new column that sets boundaries and then multiplies your selected columns by your chosen weights and then sorts on that. Then you get to filter on weighted sum.

Mine would be like
Min7 notcrazy
Min6 smarteffective
Min4 hot

I also prefer larger and paler children so I will add these to my equation

Then you could do a weighted sum equation like this:
.2(not crazy) + .2(smarteffective) +.2(hot) +.2(total bone mass) + .2(inversemelanin)

Women can smell genetic fitness. Taking birth control pills alter this. It's some pheromone or something. They can smell a good mate. That's why not using deodorant or anti perspirant is good. If that attraction isn't there, the relationship won't last

It's not their worldview. They wouldn't want this if they knew what it entails in the long term.
Their vector isn't more effective. There's no opposite vector, or rather there's no exposition to an opposite vector. You mentioned Andrew Wilson. Put him on tv/smartphones 24/7 like the Jewish vector and see which one wins in the end.

Only tribal leaders could afford to have more than one woman before civilization. They wouldn't be leaders if their subordinates weren't able to have women too.
After civilization this was even more ingrained in the fabric of reality simply because you needed working hands.

muh looks

That's a womans thing to do. Men lead with competence and wealth while women lead with looks and youth. Men trying to looksmaxx is just a gateway to homosexuality or becoming a tranny. Wanting men to 'look good' is a sure way to homofy society.

I stated verbatim that you have twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors, which is statistically likely to be the case. This shows that more males have failed to reproduce than females throughout history. There's no "trying to refer to", if you can't understand it, plug it into chatgpt and translate it into whatever flavor of ebonics you are most comfortable with.

Because of modicum of real life experience will tell you their ideology is bullshit. It's all about social circles, and those are determined almost purely by circumstances. All those cool chad friend groups you see in places like that, clubs, festivals etc. are either childhood, high school or uni friends, or the were in the same section/department at work or something. I've seen countless cases of ugly guys dating pretty women because of shared social circles or environment. Looks matter for very low context situations like dating apps or clubs, but as far as having a fun social life and access to potential partners, it's all about having friends.

Great and that does nothing to benefit civilization

This is literally me, I haven’t trooned yet but Im getting there.
What causes this? Jewish mind parasites??

? Having a woman be attracted to you can lead to a relationship which can lead to children which benefits civilization. You're a stupid faggot retard

I stated verbatim that you have twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors, which is statistically likely to be the case

Statistically I'm far less likely to be a paki than you are. It's literally impossible to have an unequal number of ancestors of each sex without inbreeding. With polygamy (which does inevitably lead to inbreeding), you still have only one biological mother, regardless of whoever else your father fucks. Or maybe you believe in reverse telegony?

This shows that more males have failed to reproduce than females throughout history.

Those who failed to reproduce are no one's ancestors.