Humans evolved from earlier apes in Africa

The ENTIRE global scientific community (over 99% of scientists worldwide) accepts the verifiable reality that is the evolution of species.

Biologists observe and document evolution happening in the lab, as well as in nature. We can trace our lineage and the lineages of other organisms through time with DNA, and we can corroborate this data with fossils that point to the exact same conclusion: organisms evolve and change over time.

The earliest Homo sapiens remains discovered to date were found in Africa, in present day Morocco. They were dated via thermoluminescence (TL) to around 300,000 years ago. Far older remains of human ancestors like Homo heidelburgensis and Homo erectus have also been found in Africa, the latter emerging around 2 million years ago.

You cannot grow out of your own ancestry. You are a member of every taxonomic clade your ancestors belonged to, even if you or the descendants of your species create new clades for themselves. You evolved from eukaryotes, so you are still a eukaryote. You evolved from tetrapods, so you are still a tetrapod. You evolved from mammals, so you are still a mammal. You evolved from apes, so you are still an ape.

Life is far more enjoyable when you understand biology and scientific methodology in general.

Homo sapiens.png - 1280x602, 160.57K

niggers never adapt and survive, stuck on tutorial island

The good old "out of Africa" theory is boomer science.

What is your point exactly? Your phrasing suggest some kind of "lol Anon Babble btfo" post, but you didn't actually say anything that btfos us.

OOA is pro-white. If all humans evolved from a common ancestor in africa then africa is the native homeland of all humans, including whites. This debunks colonial guilt. Whites were not stealing other people's land, they were just returning to their own ancestral homeland. In contrast europe is not the native homeland of all humans, only whites are indigenous to europe. If you accept OOA then not only are all indigenous rights arguments against colonialism are null and void, those same arguments now support the mass expulsion of non-whites from europe. I don't see why you would expect Anon Babble to be outraged about this. If you are one of those "believe the science" types then I predict that you will soon go looking for some new science to believe in now that the current science has been shown to be problematic.

yeah apes just spawned in every part of the planet for no biological reason

Niggers are literally less evolved subhumans if it is true, so I am happy to believe it.

japan is the center of the world when you place the americas as the far east and china is the middle east, jews just tried to pull wool over your eyes

It's based.
Africa = everyone's homeland.
Europe = european homeland.
Conclusion = there was nothing wrong with colonialism.
OOA is one of the most pro-white beliefs in mainstream academia.

also atlantis was in the pacific not imthe atlantic because jews tried to trick everyone and redraw the world where israel is the center

But when they came out of Africa the ones that turned west bread with Neanderthals and those that turned East bred with Denisovans.
We acquired genes quickly to adapt to the different environments.
I don't count the ones that stayed in Africa as 'human', they are still animals.

Greenwich, England is the centre actually.

the pacific ocean is supposed to be the atlantic ocean, the indian ocean is supposed to be the atlantic, the atlantic is the indian

then why do these human migration maps show the americas as the far east?

global scientific community

Like Greta from the church of climate change?
(((global scientific community()))

And this means we should all aspire to one of our daughters marrying a superior African bull?
Very interesting, now kindly climb into this pit here.

I like this view of the globe. Also noteworthy is how south America is so far from the center of the world that is is still waiting for humans to develop civilization there.

its also where humans migrated from, its backwards of the african theory

The line would go off the edge of the map and come back on the other side on a standard world map so this way makes the information they are trying to convey easier to interpret.

then japan is roughly the center

World maps are centered on Greenwich as this is where time is calculated from - a hangover from when the British Empire meant something.

On that map the middle is somewhere between Australia and New Zealand.

atlantis mightve been in australia

The one in the OP isn't though.

BASED THEORY
So. Colonialism is nothing but Europeans returning to their ancestors homeland

This is showing how human population spread out - it is the clearest way to visualize it.

I know.

then why comment?

Africans came from India

We did not come from Africans they come from us

Because he was talking about the one in the OP.

theyre the only ones that never migrated, sentinel island is from romans trading niggers with the chinese empire for jeets slaves to build constinople

The ENTIRE global scientific community (over 99% of scientists worldwide) accepts the verifiable reality that is the evolution of species.

Biologists observe and document evolution happening in the lab, as well as in nature. We can trace our lineage and the lineages of other organisms through time with DNA, and we can corroborate this data with fossils that point to the exact same conclusion: organisms evolve and change over time.

The earliest Homo sapiens remains discovered to date were found in Africa, in present day Morocco. They were dated via thermoluminescence (TL) to around 300,000 years ago. Far older remains of human ancestors like Homo heidelburgensis and Homo erectus have also been found in Africa, the latter emerging around 2 million years ago.

You cannot grow out of your own ancestry. You are a member of every taxonomic clade your ancestors belonged to, even if you or the descendants of your species create new clades for themselves. You evolved from eukaryotes, so you are still a eukaryote. You evolved from tetrapods, so you are still a tetrapod. You evolved from mammals, so you are still a mammal. You evolved from apes, so you are still an ape.

>Life is far more enjoyable when you understand biology and scientific methodology in general.

Based truth teller.
And whites descending from Africans 100k+ years ago is no threat to the idea of white superiority, unless you believe in essential souls and that the white soul coming from the African soul somehow makes us forever primitive Africans.
The whole idea of white evolution is that, in the cold climate of Europe, whites had to evolve higher intelligence and creativity along with white skin.

Gorillas and chimps split a long time ago, so why do niggers look like apes and whites look like chimps?

You're being disingenuous and know exactly why OP's post was controversial.
Many rightists oppose OOA theory because they think it means whites are forever primitive Africans. So they constantly blab on and on about multiple places where humans evolved separately but at the same time into humans.

china created jeets by dragging abos out of australia and racemixing them with apparently jews that fucked them over in the silk road as the "chosen merchants"

Out of Africa is the theory that there was one big evolutionary path out of africa for humanity when several great migrations of hominids left africa at different points.

Or we acquire these genes from Neanderthals who had already adapted to Europe over 140,000 years

The ENTIRE global scientific community (over 99% of scientists worldwide) accepts the verifiable reality that is the evolution of species.

What happens when someone disagrees, 1pbtid?

Apes evolving into humans is unlikely, what is more likely is that they are a "branching-path" from some other creature we both evolved from. Unironicaly its more likely that we both came from some sort of pre-historic rodent.

Whites, Blacks, Asians, etc arr all different species.
Darwinism and linear evlution is fucking retarded, its always funny to see them try to explain cacinisation.

look at somalis, theyre jeets mixed with niggers because china brought in jeets to build the pyramids and then they were waiting in somalia for the chinese to take them back to india but never did

The ENTIRE global scientific community (over 99% of scientists worldwide) accepts the fact that MRNA MAGIC JUICE IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE

Huemonkey you almost had it right but then you veered off with the retarded comment about pre historic rodents.

There is no "linear" evolution. If you isolate different populations of the same species, subject them to different pressures than each other, eventually you'll get different species from the same common ancestor.

The different races are precisely this happening with a few mixing events with other hominid sub species.

Humans didn't evolve from chimps, we evolved from a common ancestor that chimps likely didn't change that much from.

china is the middle kingdom, china is the real holy land or middle east, great wall of china was built with stone quarried from the incan empire to keep out the spics

Was disproven about 15 years ago and exposed 99% of established science as the dickless cucks they are.

The ENTIRE global scientific community (over 99% of scientists worldwide) accepts the verifiable reality that is the evolution of species.


Good for them, I say it's a fantasy story.

Madagascar always gives me a chuckle. It's just around 400km off the coast of africa, but niggers never invented sailing so they didn't find it.

Retarded take
Niggers adapted to their environment, because earliest humans werent niggers. Probably darker skin than todays whites but more similat to chimps than to niggers in skin colour

there used to be a saying in the old world, either youre a chink or youre a chimp but you cant be both

God created me, I don't believe in monkey theory which Jews created.

OP never came back. Stabbed, shot and robbed by an African American (Homo niggerus)
Very sad.

Many rightists oppose OOA theory because they think it means whites are forever primitive Africans.

Do they? The only people I see opposing OOA are paranoid flat-earth types who reflexively dismiss anything that comes out of academia. If white nationalists opposed OOA on taxonomic grounds then they would just reject evolution outright since we all evolved from fish and being a fish is even worse than being a nigger.

and the differences between us apes, despite looking small from a biologist perspective, is everything. "pale blue dot" line of thinking is for midwits and DUDE WEEDs. it has nothing to do with practical realities of being a human - human isn't even an appropriate term for any person because it means nothing.

Embarrassing, Europeans first discovered Cape Verde and Sao Tome & Principe

getty.webm - 768x432, 203.34K

ctrl-f macroevolution.net