Its over for Hollywood!

AI can create movies now.

Looks more realistic with sound: youtube.com/watch?v=RGat9DRSC38

Lmfao and then just passed that stupid deep fake law

no one will actually want to watch an AI-generated movie

no one actually likes AI generated crap in general

Its only for the common folk. Laws dont apply to corporations

kojimbo will use the screaming part for his second walking simulator

AI is no joke better than the dreck Hollywood has produced since Obama forced Weinstein out and took over as creative director. It’s embarrassing how bad it’s gotten.

As soon as it's perfected and celebrity likeness is implemented everyone will be watching it and not even realize it.

A lot of people like watching AI stuff. The progress from just last two years is incredible.
anti-AI bots (kek) like you are fighting a losing war

Some coomer will use it for aicp and it will be banned or censored like all AIs.

Anyone who watches movies is a subhuman normalfaggot.

Hmm I got 2 hours free here

DURRRRR I think I'll sit on my ass slack jawed watching some actual kike slop that I know is fictional

Kys promptly holy shit

Ha! General cattle can't recognize even now when something is made in AI.

Nah, I already stopped watching movies because they're so shit already. Everything is already a reboot of a reboot of a reboot with the same facial expressions and gags and stories. AI will just be more of the same but worse.

Cool. Recreate this scene with it then and make it a closeup of the nigger's skull getting crushed.

Yeah but this board is for people not cattle. We're talking about what people will watch not what kind of grass cattle will eat (any grass in front of their face with no complaints).

Waste of energy

A lot of people like watching AI stuff

Indians aren't people.

serves him right for assembling illegal pixels

that and you can not copyright AI.
there is no point in releasing AI slop

Except for animation/cartoon stuff, it'll never catch on. The human element simply isn't there. "Uncanny valley" is a real phenomenon, and it makes people uncomfortable down to our souls.

and i suppose (you) are a real human bean who only slurps real jew media?
can't see the difference, really.

Imagine what happens if the scene moves

it running off a script, like say a novel, and it'd probably be decent. but you'd need human help to get things more in context.

I don't even watch movies though

Anon Babble always points out all the subversion in them anyway to laugh at without having to spend time on them.

damn, when are they going to make a movie comprised of a thousand 5 second clips stitched together with an awkward pause between each scene and character who change from scene to scene!?
KINO!

I'M ACTING

And I will continue to not watch your slop.

it's ok if you made convinced them to sign a contract

only we're allowed to make use of face of celeb #576241563

there are already ways
and who do you think makes the laws? its only to gatekeep

saar, please stop redeeming

Made with google

Please, have some self-respect

That’s it, I’m selling my television

If you've watched a movie in the past few years, you've watched AI content. You just didn't notice.

literal bot

The video quality is impressive, but these algorithms will 100% suffer from what the image generators are suffering from, which is that they don't understand what the fuck you want from them and what they are drawing, and will just shit out whatever roughly corresponds to the words you used based on their training data.

Good luck making any character perform a couple specific actions in sequence, let aone multiple characters.

I'm waiting for the first Anon Babble film festival

no one really watches movies in general anymore, even if you remove the diversity slop, the stories are completely uninspiring and plastic

Ai doesn't have sound and can't talk, can't ai sound.

It looks like shit
I’m not watching anything made by (((CIA))) kikes and their brainwashing box of transistors

Shut up Jew shill
It’s fake a creepy looking

OP is a fag and doesn’t realize we need physical false idols to guide us.

The problem is that when I see these figures emote, I feel nothing. It's like listening to the pleasantries of a call center worker. Technically everything is in place, but it's false.
Instead of a performance that emerges out of the experience of a human being, direction, and context, we get a blatant emotional manipulation.
It's as if we go to a magician's performance, but instead of magic there's a screen showing us an AI magician. But we know AI can do anything. Everything it shows us is an illusion. So there is no magic. No skill. No surprise.
That's how I feel watching these clips.

with all the green screens, led lighting, cgi, filters, post edits of digital media movies/shows have felt fake for a while now.

If you look at the progress that has been made in 2 years, and see this, you know what this will look like in 2 years (assuming no Samson option and we still have electricity). This is what people will be watching and it will become an evolved form of memes. Meme movies will be huge.

Give it a year or so. Shits improved so much in the last 12 months already.

same old bullshit, but slightly more refined (two more weeks, I'm sure, keep polishing that turd)

positioning and interactions still make little sense whenever the scene has the tiniest bit of complexity beyond single subject in room

shit still morphs for no reason, especially off screen

shit still materializes from thin air

MIND BLOWN MIND BLOWN

their skins still looks weird

youtube.com/watch?v=kxuIJAgTepQ
Yeah we keep getting obvious improvements but SURELY this time it's the top. Two years ago doesn't count, that's forever ago (never mind it only feels like forever just because we are constantly spoiled with improvements). You are surely not a boiling frog. Just two more weeks until the technology plateaus!
By the way, I am not pro-AI, you can be anti-AI and not delusional about the progress it's making.

AI can really only mimic human behavior, language, etc. So these first generation AI "actors" are learning from real actors. As human actors get replaced, AI will mimic old AI performances, eventually it will become a self perpetuating cargo cult. An AI Kabuki theater of exaggerated expressions, emotions and bad "acting". Also AI has the problem of having every character in the scene expressing the same levels of emotion.

If you're an actor starting out, you just got unemployed. All those shit-tier jobs that paid the bills? AI can do them.
Humanity is going to have a major pipeline problem in the future. All entry level positions are being colonized by AI, and we still don't know if this gen of AI is really going to be creative or insightful or just regurgitate and hallucinate.
What happens in 20 years when this gen never made it, and can't take over?

Yea it's a shame this technology has been stuck making the same exact thing for five decades. Oh well, I guess all we can hope for is marginal improvements in the next ten years or so.

Thinking about this the wrong way anon. It is not about making a movie with AI it is about REMAKING movies with AI.
Imagine an AI that can replace actors in existing films with ones you select. This would solve the woke issue, instantly great a new industry, and give yuge leverage.

The right should jump on this and own it.

yes it can. this week i listened to some AI songs, music texts and all. better than half the rap/pop-slop out there.

That's why there's still room for human creative input in the form of writing/directing/motion capture. It won't go away entirely. It's also why AI will still need humans on some level.

I would, specifically, new Star Trek: TNG episodes. A lot of the episodes are just talking, so AI would work really well for this. Just need someone who's able to create good scripts and care about production values. An entire episode could be made by a single person with this tech. An entirely new season 8 without all the gayness of modern trek? yes fucking please.

Mommy.

I'm going to make new Miami Vice episodes. That's my retirement plan to keep busy.

Yeah it's literally over for Hollywood, if they start doing this they will e done. Nobody is gonna watch that shit.

Very exciting that users who actually care about the quality of content, will be pushing out new episodes of these great old shows. Pretty much ensures the death of modern gay TV, which is a good thing.

Yeah, dude. Just like nobody wants to watch cartoon movies or CGI movies. Anybody on the anti-AI bandwagon is a fucking hipster or just isn't capable of seeing the bigger picture.

obvious improvement

it's the top

obvious improvement

different parts of the technology can improve while other parts already hit an obvious limit
there are core mistakes being made now that were already there when wool smooth was eating pasta and they show no signs of being solved or even solvable with this tech

I can't wait until they use this technology to auto replace CIA agents in CCTV camera footage so they can stage false flags again.
Or create false footage of you committing crimes that pass some normie AI detector, so they can throw you into prison for 50 years.

A lot of people like watching AI stuff

Yeah? What's your favorite AI movie, Dikshit Ramaman?

Bros, we gotta make the story of Anne Frank

AI slop never not be creepy and uncanny, no matter how much detail there is in it.

i'd rather watch ai generated slop than jew generated slop tbqhwy

When I go libraries I take Anne Frank books and put them in the Fiction section.

Yeah, there's algorithmic issues and I believe that causes fundamental problems. But Pandora's box is open on billions of dollars of research. We reached the tipping point that you can actually use AI for some businesses, I don't think we will see an AI winter again. I anticipate fundamentally new algorithms if we reach a plateau.
I don't rule out being surprised by workarounds with current algorithms though, for example OpenAI's new image generation can apply its "world knowledge" and render text consistently. It hasn't even been applied to video yet, and it's the first model of its kind. We are nowhere near a dead end, I will be very surprised if we're at the exact moment now when current algorithms have peaked.

People watching movies unconsciously want to be the main characters they see who are strong, handsome and get the girl. They may even mimic the actor, like the generation of kids who wanted to be James Dean. When AI takes over movies, people will start mimicking AI actors, which will then inform future AI performances.

I can't wait until they use this technology to auto replace CIA agents in CCTV camera footage so they can stage false flags again.

lmao that already happens now. You think the feds are waiting on that tech?
US law states military and feds get first dibs on ALL US Patents, the military and feds decide when the Patents are for public use.

And to see how everything started.
People will call the old one as soulful, though.

I mean, you can do some pretty dope shit with AI.

911

I thought guys falling in love with AI were full schizo.
Then this happened.
I'm in love.
youtu.be/KVoiooE8C0c

not the same

How come AI can just make ~5 second clips? What is that going to do? Why can't it make something longer? I have yet to see it create something entertaining

It has no soul so I can always tell its fake. AI is so fucking cringe.

Since you can’t copyright this , how would you make money off it ?

Because we don't have fusion reactors yet.

That ass flesh didn't move the way it's supposed to.

I mean, why did it take 9 years for the GameBoy to have color?

Give it some time, it will soon. A lot of people are working hard to make it perfect.

yes ass couldnt distract me from noticing the fingers

The tits were triangle until they weren't. Remember that, leaferino.

That's true, but just the fact that it's a video made from a picture and that bitch added a whole new person into it and animated it and all that is pretty cool. I'm not cooked enough to generate multiple videos like that to get the perfect one, but it's pretty what AI can do so quickly. Speaking of quickly, I think it spit the video out in less than 10 minutes.

They could have had color the reason cited was batteries. The technology was there

Why can't it make something longer?

it can and it does.

netflix ai screenwriter: hallucinates gay sex

hbo ai screenwriter: hallucinates full frontal male nudity

what? AI can literally do all sound - music, sound effects, replicate text to speech with perfect delivery. It can even d conversations where it can in real time speak to a human. And this is now, it is only going to improve. It is getting so advanced it can even be done locally now. You have to remeber that a film is on average going to 90 mins or 2 hours say. Someone will be able to do all the genning, all the sound, all the after effects, editing all on a computer on their own. Only their skill as knowing what makes it good will be a barrier. Get a small team who know their stuff in visual, sound, acting, etc etc and they will be churning out movies, series to rival anything. No expensive cameras, no expensive shooting at all. Of course one day it will be able to simply turn out a movie via a script given, it will all be trained on the hundreds of thousands of movies. This is why the actors, musicians etc are crying and wanting it stopped - they know their days are numbered.

S O V L

Where? Show me an example that doesn't cut.

But don't actors simply base their own acting style on what came before? They have acting schools where they are taught how to act, the method acting. AI can also combine acting styles to create a new acting style. I mean how many different acting styles can there be? Certainly AI can mimic closely to what has been and it will be seen even with a different face. You can then also merge that style to whatever percentage to another style. You get a new style, you can they merge that to another style and so on.

Yeah, I use an app called Suno to make songs sometimes and it actually makes some pretty good sounding beats. I'm not a writer, so I just feed it nonsensical lyrics about stupid shit to see what it can do. The AI future is coming, bros.

This. There's no real control, even with Lora's and Controlnets and other tweaky shit. But I think it will have its uses.

They are tho, they are like classic old style old interweb gifs and shit. You could makemake that with the current AI tech and it will look far better, it won't have the same feel tho. It is like redoing anything new, unless you have the same effort and feeling into it you end up with Disney's Snow White.

plebs gobble cgi slop which looks even worse than ai and has retarded reddit writing so

yeah but things will change if we can make them ourselves

Yes I use Suno and you can put in pretty much anything except rip off lyrics done before (you would have to rewrite them and feed it in). the point is it is no longer gatekeeped by fags in movies, the music industry who are pushing out total shite nowadays and morons lap it up.

7 of 9 with boobas out at all times.

Yeh CGI is terrible, overused garbage. AI would best all that shit and can also do the normal stuff. There still be room for filmed stuff, but let's be honest. If it is cheaper to make a film via AI - or at least part of it then that is what is going to happen. It can already do porn easily and done locally on a pretty low priced card. They will have access to commercial rack of $50k AI cards - not a 8gb Nvidia gayming card.

Anon Babble AI content general, for example
here, take the spoon in your mouth, go lurk some more and come back again to complain that you don't like the taste, just yet. you're welcome.

umm
i dont even understand whats supposed to be going on, it's all 2-second jumpcuts with no continuity

I think that's Veo 2

That link is broken

Moving scenes dont work with AI, its the same expressions as they were for 2 years now.

I expect a huge backlash against AI in the coming years. People may even turn their backs on social media because of it

You are correct. But we just need a few more years of inage recognition to have a command that says "computer, remember the woman in the blue dress you rendered in video 5? Save her and use her again in video 12" we arent there yet but only a matter of time

Based

you can simply take the last frame of that genned video and use it as the source of the next genned video and so on. You just have to make sure the quality does not decline, so you need the frame as good as the original or the quality will decline (a copy of a copy of a copy etc)

Good old "cognitive hazard" kino.

I wouldn't watch some random AI shit, but I'd watch an anon do work, same way I'd enter a friend's house and not a fucking randomer's slum

you can never create a perfect duplicate of a frame. It will just lead to a cut which is all AI is now. 5-8 second clips that are used for fapping or memes. I am not against the technology at all. AI as of now is far better for finding information than search engines are but so far the video stuff is overblown and seems to be at a bottleneck. When AI can create a one minute or longer video that is entertaining then I will be impressed

I would agree if everything they see is AI genned, that they know it is AI genned then it will trigger their minds into thinking they are being lied to - even tho that was the case they want to be lied to with a human face to it. Ads wit han AI face, AI genned versus some celeb shilling some stuff? I think it is down to how easily they can be made, people would know getting a real actor, to work on a script versus an AI doing pretty much everything - it can create the script, gen in seconds

no one will actually want to watch an AI-generated movie

no one actually likes AI generated crap in general

AI fills a role in hentai images. Characters that would normally never get any lewd art now get lots of it. With human editing, they often look just fine. I'd greatly prefer an AI hentai video, even unvoiced, to the 3DCG used by low quality hentai studios.

I think marketing companies will adopt AI very quickly for ads, and you'll start to see AI used for "remasters" of old movies, like Star Wars, where an actor has aged too much to re-film a scene. Then they will start replacing stunt actors with AI regularly. Then, maybe, they'll go full AI. I think it will take time for full AI movies, though. Maybe 10 years because of a lack of acceptance and all the boycotts and picketing from live actors.

Exactly. Anybody will be able to create whatever they want and share it. And just like anything else, content that's not good will sink and really good stuff will rise to the top. I wonder how hard they're gonna' try to nerf it, though. AI could essentially ruin the porn industry and that would be kind of funny because it would piss off slimy producers AND it would piss off the feminist nutjobs who simultaneously see porn as exploitive, but also "like, totally legit work because, like, sex work is real work, chud!"

durr watching film (art) is a waste of time

Oh yea so sit on Anon Babble all day every day arguing with people who hate you instead islamonigger
Are you actually that stupid?

there's algorithmic issues and I believe that causes fundamental problems

this.

fundamentally its still if this pixel is this next pixel must be like that. theres still no understanding what is shown on the image or anything. the prediction of next pixel just gets better and better with the increasing amount of training and trainings data until we hit the ultimate limit with this tech. reaching the limit will be exponentially more difficult/expensive the closer we get.
i'm impressed what this simple trick can achieve but in the end its just the question, is the prediction of next pixel/token/whatever good enough for whatever i'm using it?
this also leads to the consequence of (((ai))) with current tech cant create something new, it was already there in the trainings data or was given as input to work with. only stupid, lazy or untaltendet people fear (((ai)))

ai made new star trek series would be kino. just give it all the sci fi novels ever written and tell it to come up witha bunch of characters and plots

Get the fuck out of here with this dogshit fear mongering. It looks like shit, it will always look like shit. Animation, maybe. Live action, there's just too much data being processed and merged by our visual cortex. We've evolved to recognize human faces, body language in a way that is non-trivial to replicate.

I will, if I could generate my own movies thatd be sick as fuck

well actually you can and you can even upscale tha tframe to be better than the original. If say I genned at 480p and at 16fps (which I do via Wan2.1) then sure it isn't HD, it isn't 30FPS or 60FPS. This can all be upscaled. Now regarding that last frame to use as a source. that frame is just a source photo, you can edit it howe ver you want before using it as that source. You can match to that previous 5 sec gen to get everything right. AI of course will be able to do this as well. Plus this is all locally, commercial cards are going to be genning at 4k nevermind 720p like you can with higher spec cards like the 4090-5090's and on interfaces catered to commercial genning

there's no spoon, because i suck at cross-boarding. lurk more

The opposite from your post will be true
People would rather watched personalized feature length films tailored specifically to their taste, than "wide appeal" hollywood garbage.
Most people don't even care about the technical flaws in films already, why would they care about the flaws in an AI produced film?

create

Hell. Some people even think the little goofs in movies are fun. Like continuity errors and stuff. The mint ice cream changing every shot didn't hold Pretty Woman back from being a total classic.

Show me an example then of someone doing this

this thing doesn't exist

it does

show me

no

The moment someone says "I am not spoon feeding you" or "google it yourself" for an argument they are making it just means they got caught lying and have no proof. Thank you for making my argument for me. I accept your concession.

AI just makes things easier, and as always there will be millions of gens whether music, videos, images that are just poor. You can go on Suno, on Discord and see the state of the songs people do. And i do actually blame their music ear, that is actually what they like. they actually want to produce the complete trash that is produced to this day my the shitty music industry. The yare given a tool to produce whatever they want and they they choose to duplicate the trash available anyway. I don't mind if someone only like to push out K-Pop shit, it has ab audience. If people want out push out yet another tuneless modern "pop" song then so be it. Music taste is for the individual.

guys i just created my first full blown AI movie. its two hours long! it's JUST like a 1:1 real hollywood movie!!! i just uploaded it to my twitter if you want to watch

um why aren't people watching my movie? wtf, why is everyone watching that e-celeb's AI movie instead of mine? mine is so much better, why don't people appreciate my talent, why am i not getting likes or comments, why am i not popular?

That's not what will happen.
The eceleb will get recommended stuff by their viewers, who themselves will be trawling internet circles for good content.
So if your AI movie doesn't get picked up by ecelebs, you just got unlucky or it wasn't as good as you thought.
Ecelebs won't have time to make movies themselves, and even then it might not even be good. See: Critical Drinker, Red Letter Media, etc

brainrotted boomers are already watching AI videos on youtube and think they're real. Can't wait for Indians scammers to start using AI videos to trick boomers.

It is a form of creation. To be pretty fair, the bar for creating anything is actually super low when you're a human. All you need is an idea. How you execute it is up to you. Animate the shit with clay, draw it frame by frame, describe it in detail to a computer. Whatever you gotta' do. People try to gatekeep creativity a little too hard, but really it's not some big special thing meant for special people only.

Show me an example then of someone doing this

You already know it is done. You can literally extend up to 30 secs on the commercial genning sites. You can try that for free if you want. Locally then you are going to have to simply make sure that source photo from the last frame matches the quality if the gen and you already know that can be done so why even debate it?

as in most things, quality control is essential for AI stuff. there are tons of trash and you need to find the gems that satisfy your taste.

its just machine generation which makes it a worthless toy because everyone can press a button to generate generic sameish output

There's a video link with sound (which is made with ai too). Its muted for Anon Babble.

Show me an example. You are saying something exists like the other retard but refuse to show me an example

the coping is hard
hollywood as been unsustainable for years bombing harder with each release because now everyone have an opinion and complaint about every fucking lil details, AI will fix this, everyone will be able to make its star wars version, gay star wars,black star wars, whatever, why spend billions on snow white when a 6 years old can make it with prompt in 5minute
fucking "artist" are on suicide watch and its beautiful this is the next step in evolution and nothing will stop it
it fear the slop and the factory is open for business: we will live to see man-made horrors beyond our comprehension

You either didn't try hard enough to reach your target audience or your movie sucks. I mean, is the e-celeb actually making fire content? Sounds like a case of a no-name trying to compete with an established brand right outta' the gate with no advertising or anybody to vouch for their quality. Throw a few bucks at it for ads. Kek

yes hence why having more of it out there means even if 99% isn't that good then 1% or even 0.01% there is going to be lot's of it. these local genning models like Wan2.1 are only a few months old and are improving. People forget that tech moves fast and this will be seen as old very soon as they improve. The commercial stuff has improved as well. It is down to what is genned tho, and i do like some of the goofy stuff as well

Somebody literally just pushed a button on this gizmo and made one of the dopest songs of all time...

Fucking retards like this have been posting similar comments since the original Will Smith eating spaghetti video. Do these retards not realize how short a time has passed from that to this or can they just not see past the current moment? I dont know how these dumbfucks function.

Pure Sovlless Kino. Get fucked Hollywood

Looks more realistic with sound

Its not about movies. Its about deepfrying your brain with loads of AI advertising and botted, inorganic social media bullshit. The brainrot will be so powerful, people wont be able to marathon 5min videos, let alone movies

I suspect that those people have a higher than average melanin content. They might be niggers, if you know what I mean.

AI has pretty much bottle necked in the last year when it comes to videos and can't escape the 5-8 second clip hell

lolz, I can see the micro stutters where the 5 secs are up. This will be impossible to filter out or fix

.

I like it for memes and shitposting, but I would never pay a single cent to view ai generated crap

can literally see the cuts every couple of seconds

If I mock him bringing this up in advance it refutes it for reasons

thanks for proving me right

Grug never pay single rock to see cave doodle not made by earth glitter

this, the government and corpos walk in lockstep gripping each others cocks. it will be used to create whatever narrative they wish and all the idiots who used it for years trained it FOR FREE!

It won't be a movie. It'll be fabricated evidence to put political dissidents in an arena.

Okay? Artists literally push corporate shilling at every stage. Show me protest art against transgenderism. Against homosexuality. Art is supposed to be provocative but funny enough it aligns with all corporate ideals right now

So you actually do believe that a commercial site giving people free access to something that isn't even their top model, isn't going to gen at anywhere near their top stepping rates and was done months ago means that AI is dead in the water? For a start those microstates between the gens can be edited out, they can be matched. The whole sequence can be put through AI to not only upscale but to match it. It can also be put through non AI video editing. This is like saying the rough filming where no effects are put in, where the splicing has not been done means a film can never be produced. And yes that gen was up to the 30 sec max and as is, no editing, no messing with it. That is what it did. Anyone filming a scene would be cutting splicing elements together, matching them to get everything right, editing the lighting, adding more visual effects. And a reminder this is AI now and what is thrown at the public. People are video genning on 6-8GB Nvidia cards and it's only been a few months. People on 4090's or 5090's are genning in 720p

coomerbros... we won...
so many things to generate. filthy imagination is the limit.

Some of them look better than bullshit out of hollyjew. Expect Hollywood themselves to start using this and when it improves we’ll be able to make movies on our own

Bring back 80s/90s Stallone, Arnold, and Willis movies. I'll watch that shit for days

They don't have to give me free access. They can simply show this exists themselves but none of them have yet. Nice strawman though.

ackhuallly model censorship is the limit
also laws
but then again
just dont be a subject of a NAFO state

oy vey, you will continue to watch my shitty quality porno on all the sites we own and those snippets of 4k action and you will pay $30 a month to view our premium porno of soon to be dead whores. No no will you make prorno to your own tastes, you will like our vanilla porn with shitty scripts

Watched Commando recently, the whole opening when Arnie has a romantic date with his 12 year old daughter was so Freudian.
youtu.be/NSbX42J96Bo

#
#
Here's an old video of replacing yourself as a character of the video.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rv0qBbJq4qQ

how is it different from other animated movies?
slops+normiecattle is a match made in heaven

Checked. Are you winning gramps?

Great movie. I'd watch movies like this over the gay shit these days if the AI was good enough.
youtu.be/CB_H6v_ow5E

And i already showed you an example tha twas unedited that only had very minor micro stutters. That could be put through Flowframes to not only get rid of that but also to boost the FPS to whatever, 60FPS, 120FPS. YTes the AI will put in frames in between other frames to increase the overall frame rate. So I can gen at 480p at 16 FPS. i can upscale that, I can increase the FPS to 60, 120FPS etc. I actually think you are crying that AI isn't doing EVERYTHING, it isn't delivering a finished video. there was a time when people said AI would not be able to rival professional photographers taking photos but with a genned photo, that time has well passed. and again, this is still early hence why the actors, musicians are crying about being unemployed. Yes even the OF whores will have to go out and actually work for a living instead of simps sending them money to flash a boob.

i like anything that makes artists seethe

And i already showed you an example tha twas unedited

But it was edited. You can literally see where the clip ends and the next one begins. It's also funny anytime you retards want to show anything impressive it's just a video of someone walking or standing still but that's besides the point

never saw the mc donnald's run by cats.

ngmi

no instead you will pay sam altman and the gang for unlimitless coomerslop. at the coomerbuffet. to rot your ability to think and feel like a normal person instead. to be too busy glued to the screen with a hand to you cock, instead of a fulfilling life. you sure got them good bucko

edited

lolz that was the AI commercial site on the free access. No editing at all. But here I will breakdown what you have. You have a 5 sec genned clip, the last frame is the source of the next genned clip. This is no different than having a 30fps movie scene of say 30sec and you get a sequence of images from it. Yes you can grab any scene, movie series whatever & you can get all the images from that 30 sec scene. so that's 30 (fps)x30 (sec) to give 900 images. You can do the same with an AI video, you can increase the FPS of a 16FPS genned video to 60 or 120, but let's stick to 30fps. You also get 900 images from that AI genned video. Do you actually think editing is now impossible?

I do think the kikes will jump on this AI to protect their porn shit. No one cares really about "porn stars" and AI can make actual attractive whores - it's all pixels an not some meth head toilet slut covered in tats.

No editing at all

the last frame is the source of the next genned clip

Yup that's a roundabout way of saying editing. Two or more different clips were spliced together

"suno"

an hindi word meaning "listen"

Its an jeet app

This is antisemitic

AI can be copyrighted. You attribute it to an artist (real or otherwise) and copyright it that way. I heard some production companies are alrwady doing it.

Holy shit, dudes. Google "Veo3 non existent car show." That's some pretty wild shit. Audio and everything. Looks a little weird in some parts, but others really sell it.

i've seen the movie and was very interested in the making of feature, but the film is a terrible mess overall.

Ok so you "complaint" is that AI is doing 30 sec or longer scenes in one gen? That the model "forgets" what it is genning and goes "off script"? And how exactly is it a problem if the last frame of the gen is then used as a source to the ngen on and on and on? That is exactly how all film and video work. Sure AI will eventually be able to produce far longer clips from a source. But incidentally if it can automatically take that last frame & gen from that then what exactly is the difference? It is like them shotting several times scene & then splicing the best ones together to make the scene. Maybe something was wrong in part of it, instead of filming a whole scene again they filmed it from just before the part that had the error. And they splice that to the part that was good, some parts of scenes can only be filmed once. Ironically CGI and now AI is used to edit scenes all the time because something was wrong & this is all done in the post filming and editing part.

I can tell all these are AI because of the brightness and pauses/unnatural speech patterns.

Still uncanny. Also they don't do eyes well unless close up. Eyes aren't black if there's a sunset.

My complaint is that AI can't make long videos and can only make small clips that get stitched together.. I am no AI designer but it probably is because it becomes an incoherent mess the longer it goes on. When you have a 8 minute video where a lot of things are happening the final frame isn't reference even though for the previous 8 seconds of what happened.

I bet if we ever get this capability, it will require input that isn't a few lines but more like entire movie scripts maybe even more complex as you need to keep reminding the AI of the setting and what happened before. A single frame is not enough

Remake the whole movie, but with the protagonists as cute anime girls, then change it to a happy ending where they go TND and cleanse the town. I'll pay to watch it.

We just gonna' gloss over the fact that this shit is even possible at all? This is some kooky shit and we're not even really there yet. Lol

How's this Veo 3 thing for making lewd shit?

Oddly enough, one arena AI still sucks at is writing. It can write but it is formulaic and passionless and cliche and cheesy. The English major continues to dominate the 21st century.

Peak Cinema.

What song?

To make a 1 hour video you will need 720 - 5 sec clips. So 2 hours would be 1440 videos. A 5 sec clip where you then automatically then use the last frame to use as the source for the next genned clip. It just goes on and on. It can't then forget becuase it is genning 5 sec clips and has the source image of the last frame. The prompt can be matched to where it is in the sequence. AI could even write the prompt to match it, making alterations. And this is now, longer clips are simply down to the training of the models. ironically you can gen up to 12 secs on Wan2.1 locally, yes it will get messed up as it "forgets". But as is known, people can make the longer scenes by stitching them together.

i watched that "cat dad saves cat daughter from shark" slideshow video 100 times

Its over for Hollywood!

Finally. It was about time.

Clint Eastwood.

I agree even tho it could be trained on everything written. It think then it is down to what style of writing is wanted, it is only like someone being taught writing to a style and then not using any creative element to break from that. Certainly for writing news articles, technical papers etc it will excel. Writing novels, I think people will still want something written by a human. Would be interesting to pit a human novel against an AI written one and base on how original and good they are. And see how many can spot the AI or human one correctly.

Huh...just one button ya say?
Which button?
I do enjoy that tune.

A 5 sec clip where you then automatically then use the last frame to use as the source for the next genned clip

How is it going to remember everything that happened before the last frame? You pan a camera in one direction 180 degrees then you paint back another 180 degrees how is it going to remember all of that based on a single frame? Imagine panning through a unique skyline with many buildings, stopping then panning back. The way AI works now when it goes back you won't get the same skyline you saw before

The amount of cope in this thread is delicious. Everyone saying it looks like shit are big mad. It took video games 50 years to get to where they are today. It took a.i. 2 years to get from Will Smith eating spaghetti to this, and these aren't even the best of the bunch.
All the lefties screaming for coal miners and plumbers to learn to code and its their "creative" jobs its going to gut first.
Everyone will indeed want to watch ai generated movies to see how creative random everyday people can be. Its YouTube all over again. YouTube gained popularity BECAUSE it was just random everyday people making content and not hollywood slop. That's what people are craving again, since youtube has become the home of msm and advertiser friendly content and less about the everyday random person.
When it gets jail-broken and you can make realistic porn, all the only fans chicks and pornhubs of the world will die out.

I fucking love that clip.
That one and this one.
Hate cats though.

There's a YouTube video where he says it's like, "preset 1" I think. Actually a fun watch.

You know this is AI because the burger actually looks presentable

how is it going to remember

It can because each gen has a seed number. You can use that same seed number, put the same prompt in, use the same Loras - the same settings and you will get an exact duplicate of that gen that was originally done. If it knows the seed number the nit knows what was generated. In any case it generates on the basis of noise, so the source image is what it generates from. As for keeping everything in place (so as if no one moved anything during re filming scenes - a moved coffee cup or it disappearing for instance) then that is down to the model used. Yes that is one area where AI can slip, with backgrounds changing - a warping effect. But again the source image is simply the last image of something genned, it is all based on that.

It already has been trained on everything ever written. And on how to write. And literary theory and criticism. It can replicate and parody but cannot utilize language in an original way to express experience - because it has not actually experienced anything. Graphic AI works better because it's literally just taking together visual theory and sources to replicate. But ask AI to write anything close to original fiction and it's terrible. But why? Language usage for expression has infinitely more shades of subtly, style, and human elements that by its very nature A simply cannot understand. It doesn't actually know what sex feels like as a person, or love, or jealousy, and how innately subjective that experience is - and how the talent of a writer is to translate subjective experience to a near-universal (in terms of understanding) one. Though AI has the language, it lacks the visceral experience necessary to write convincingly and originally to capture and ignite human imagination.

I have never seen an AI video do what I am saying and keep its consistency. I have no idea what if you are saying is true or not, maybe it theoretically can be true but AI is not doing it currently.

There are always naysayers, luddites (however they are using tech which let's say 20 years ago they would have said was not possible). CGI has been around for decades, AI will replace all of that because CGI is both time consuming and looks shit most of the time. The AI models are improving all the time via training, via better techniques. The best testament of course is when it will be used and no one will be able to tell it's even AI.

I would love to watch lord of the rings in a dark 80s setting made by a.i.
Respecting the lore and without glitches of course

Nothing Ever Happens
Even Ai is still garbage compare to the human made.

Movies will be outdated once ai nearly perfected its machine plagiarism.
Humans will invent a new form of media
Like literally going and living inside a movie or a very interactive theatre with robots.

Why stick to couch potato movies when you can larp like holodeck

Though AI has the language, it lacks the visceral experience necessary to write convincingly and originally to capture and ignite human imagination.

well yes however that is also down to how good a human writer a person is. And AI could literally plagiarise a novel and rewrite it on another subject. I do really think it would be interesting to get AI & human written novels. Get a bunch of keen readers to read them (people not familiar with any novels given to sample) and see if they can pick out the AI from human. But ultimately we all know AI will eventually be able to rival any writer anyway. The question is can you do better than human written and what would that be like anyway?

Because if everyone can make their own movies, why should they watch yours?

It can’t create a movie, it can create a trailer; disjointed shots do not a movie make. Show me AI making extended shots and sequences with consistent characters and lip sync and an understanding of basic cinematography and we’ll talk

Just what we needed AI slop generated by Steven Segals grease fingers

Ive seen some early tech versions of short movies made by some random user, it was impressive sc-fi. A couple of years from now only god knows what media can be created with improved a.i

As soon as celebrity likenesses are realistic enough the jews are going to shut it down.

Now lets see some cunny

It's ridiculously overacted. All the emotions are exaggerated to the point I just feel disgust. I mean yeah it's gonna get fixed but that's how I feel about it right now

as opposed to Hollywood nigger jew crap?

garbage in, garbage out

True but companies like it because it’s cheap so it’s going to be shoved down our throats either way

AI is just CG.
Neither is real..

Why doesn’t google just let me create POV vid of 1.09.

Look at me

I am the director now

Same reason I don't just enjoy the stuff I think about in my head without consuming some form of media. Different ideas and execution of those. I can imagine being a knight fighting dragon, maybe even make myself a little comic strip of it or something. But somebody's else idea of that would probably smoke the dog balls off what I come up with and I might like what they come up with more than my own, especially if they're able to present no ideas and concepts I either didn't know about or never would have thought of. It's why they pay experts for movies and games. They can bring a LOT more firepower because they know about shit the average person doesn't. Anybody can make a war film, but get a guy who was actually in war to help you and that shit is going to a new level.

Triangles were just fine when I was 12

True. I was "forced" to watch Hollywood classic "All about Eve" on acting class and it was jaw droppingly good. And I pretty much watched everything from the 80s onwards already for fun before I watched All about Eve

Just need someone who's able to create good scripts and care about production values

Have AI do it.

Ha ha. See the problem?

Yes he was. They seldom print the media, so it'll never be real. That's what's it's all about and these images are all very ugly. From the posters to the movies it's all just washed, smoothed and samey.

Holyjew DEI script writer (probably a nigger)

v

AI trained on the best scripts in classic movies

hmm, I wonder which would be the better?

People will watch whatever you tell them to and are generally very, very dumb. They want to be misled at all costs to themselves and everything.

Here is a little longer version:
x.com/restitutorII/status/1925203942549401650?t=d_rSeZJJXcMyRRqP6zzUYA&s=19
I guess the problem of continuity will be solved with Gen AI.

The video is decent its okay but if the sounds are real that was the mindblowing part to me, we can have AI talk and move their lips correctly and add songs too.

I for one am happy to never code anything, do any accounting, be a lawyer, be in the film industry, act, sing for money, write music, write or do office jobs and anything else I missed. AI is awesome. Put my brain into the Pleasure Chair and give me my vitamin food slop into my veeeeeeiins

movies are just extended trailers tho

No, they’re not. Not unless your movie is some ADHD shitfest. Good cinematography and editing require an understanding of composition, choosing the right shot, the right framing, the right lighting and how to piece those shots together to make a scene or sequence flow. All these AI movies are the same they’re never an actual coherent sequence just a bunch of random short clips smushed together with no rhyme or reason.

white penis

AI movies aren’t better than low effort modern Hollywood slop, they’re just a slightly different flavor of slop.

Good cinematography and editing require an understanding of composition, choosing the right shot....

meanwhile Disney exist and shit out cap like it is going out of fashion. Then there is the Minecraft movie. Do you really think competent people did that or "acted" in it? the days of experts in the movie industry are gone, it's a CGI fest and the audience has the attention span of a retarded goldfish.

slick Willie knew what Kamala craved, his famous party "gag"

Any AI movie done is one guy either running a 4090 or 5090 or spending cash at Kling or another commercial AI gen house. They are not going through millions of dollars to produce the slop.

Ask it to write in any author's style right now. The output is facile and cliche. It's not about its ability to mimic - it simply cannot understand the complexity of human experience and create a convincing text representing that. It falls back to either mimicing style or repeating already created themes. Go ask it to write a story about sentient fruit in the style of Kutt Vonnegut, Jr. and it does an OK job but also just drops already established Vonnegut sayings in it (So it goes, etc). Maybe when we get to AGI or ASI it will be able to write like a person. So far, it's just a player piano in that respect.

Cope

But if you ask any writer to write in any given author's style how would they perform? Isn't it also in how a reader interprets something as well? You are not trying to say all readers will have the same experience reading any given novel etc? Let's say you read a novel and than are tasked with writing something in the same style. Given your experience reading it, given your own experience in life even do you think your writing would be similar to another human given that task? I would also say isn't it silly for something to be written in the same style anyway? Again, I said if you have a range of books on offer and some were done by AI and some by humans - would readers really be able to tell which are AI or human? And a better test would be to simply give reviews on those novels. Not even give an indication if they are AI or human. the bias in people's minds is paramount when judging anything. Take that away and they are honest.

this will age like milk

doesnt want custom tailored kinos

doesnt want a 7ft tall futanari version of Brap Dallas Howard

WHERE
ARE
THE
FUCKING
PORN
AI
MODELS

Give it 5 years. You will watch your filmslop that is made 100% with ai and you wont be able to tell the difference. You anti ai copers are delusional and have continuously been proven wrong these past 2 years.