Evolution. Nationalism. Choose one

Racial nationalism is an anti-evolution and anti-nature conceit:

Humans must not branch out and evolve.

Humans must stay within rigid boundaries.

Nature and individuals cannot mate naturally. Mating must be centrally controlled.

Mutations, the very mechnaism of evolution, are bad.

"Favored races" must not be favored races. Force is needed to stop them.

I think the reason neo-Nazis are so angry is because they're literally fighting against nature in every belief they have.
The only way they could square their political views with their scientific views is by abandoning Darwin.
But Darwin is, paradoxically, one of their heroes.
It's all very backwards and crazy.

Strong nations should protect themselves from dysgenic genes (niggers and poos)

leftist "were all equal" open borders, is actually de-evolving humanity. At any other time in history invaders got killed.

>Humans must not branch out and evolve

devolve by mixing into one low iq brown mass surviving on the knowledge AI masters give you

Sounds like a bright future. Hope you live in a big city, gringo

dysgenic genes

Wholly subjective and arbitrary. Therefore, anti-scientific.
To an athlete, a high IQ sperg shitposting on Anon Babble is dysgenic.
To a white woman craving black men, a bitter racist preventing her natural instincts is dysgenic.
To you, an IQ 130 Pajeet or Korean is dysgenic.
Literal junk science.

devolve by mixing into one low iq brown mass

Sounds like you don't believe in evolution.
Stasis - your alternative to a "brown mass" - is both unnatural and, even worse, IMPOSSIBLE.
You can't stop it and you'll be in an endless battle against nature if you try. (If you believe in evolution.)

believe in evolution.

Picrel is "unnatural".

It's unnatural....but cops and military are needed to prevent it?
Wouldn't, ya know, NATURE prevent it if it were "unnatural"?

images.jpg - 225x225, 9.39K

just none of these have anything to do with nationalist premises, it's actually baffling me as I try to think where to begin

Racial nationalism says life must be literally contained with manmade walls and the military.
Evolution says that life will always seek new horizons and, consequently, create new species.
Nationalism seeks stasis.
Darwinism seeks progress.

Evolution is not an ideology. Those suited to their environment are more likely to breed than those who are not.
If that environment happens to be a nationalist state, then breeding patterns will reflect that.

create new species.

So you larp as god now? Ok kike. Go fuck niggers and let everyone else practice their free will. My will is avoiding shitskins

For the record, I think evolution is fake and gay.
I'm a white nationalist.
But 99% of my fellow white nationalists are hardcore Darwinists.
So I've observed these completely incompatible ideologies causing all sorts of bizarre arguments and contradictions in white nationalist arguments.

Evolution works on the group level anon. You group is closer to you in DNA. Humans traditionally have married something like 2nd and 3rd cousins in a tribal mode. Racism nationalism religion are all caused by and benefit evolution.

Cope.

create new species is a LARP

Darwin's book, a neo-Nazi bible, is literally titled "ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES"

Evolution works on the group level anon

word salad nonsense
Darwinism works on natural selection after random mutations.
In other words, static lifeforms which DON'T have biologically dynamic offspring will die off.
That's the theory.

a nationalist state

But this is a manmade architecture.
Without the military there to impose this artifice, peoples will naturally reach out and interbreed. One sees this in the extremes of the phenotype.
Thus, racial nationalism is unnatural.

Not relevant.
The only difference between "natural" and "unnatural" is that the latter involves humans rather than literally any other animal. It's a completely arbitrary distinction.

You're fighting eternally against natural instincts, desires, biological impulses, and long timescale trends.
It sounds (a) impossible and (b) high time preference.
That is, if you believe in Darwinism.
If I believed in Darwinism, I would see this like trying to fight gravity: Even if you can fly for a period of time, what comes up must come down, and eventually the racial nationalsim project will inevitably crash down.

As I said: those more adapted to their environment are more likely to breed within it.
Those with greater in-group preference are generally better suited to a nationalist environment so those are the ones reproducing at higher rates.

some whites favor inbreeding and whites that fabor inbreeding will inbreed

just irrelevant blah

It doesn't take a very large population to avoid the effects of inbreeding so long as you have a culture that rejects it.

Nah we’re in the singularity now, fascism is good now

so long as you have a culture that rejects it.

"Culture" is nebulous, subjective, and transitory.
I'm talking about more powerful forces - and more powerful beliefs - than mere "culture".

humans can't evolve unless they breed with gorillas and chimpanzees!

kys nigger

we’re in the singularity now

I'm trying hard to think of something more pseud.
But I can't.
Go for the high score and drop in a few more meaningless buzzwords. Maybe, "hyperborean" or "Moore's Law" or "Hegelian"?

Humans can't breed with gorillas and chimps.
Don't know what you're talking about.

Explain where the ghost dna comes from that niggers carry

Culture is part of your environment. Sexual selection is a big part of evolutionary theory.

You keep asserting this innate desire among humans to race mix but statistics don't bear that out. And the more insular a society is the stronger the preference for one's own race becomes.

ghost dna

just stop

ghost dna is the euphemism which is used to label the part of nigger dna that comes from some non-human primates they fucked in ancient history

So the military must be used to artificially limit sexual options.
Correct.
This is my point. You're constantly battling the very nature you believe in. You're literally at war with your own worldview.
Must be exhausting.

ok

ok

so it's scientific proof that you're part monkey you nigger

234534255.jpg - 1106x1134, 128.52K

There IS an "out" for white nationalists and neo-Nazis.
There's a way that they can argue that racial nationalism IS natural.
It's just that they have to wholly abandon Darwin.
Which they'll never do.

you're too stupid to understand anything
go away and kys

All you got is cherrypicked memes. Try looking up some actual data.
Not that it even matters that much. As long as there exists people who are predisposed to in-group preference, a nationalist society would allow this population of people to flourish.

It's not a "constant fight with nature." It's a basic understanding of what those natural processes are.

you didn't even know what ghost dna was you posing nigger retard

How is branching out necessary for evolution? If something works better than alternatives, you don't break it.

If racism is unnatural, why did America become desegregated at gunpoint by the government? If racism is unnatural, why are there still racists despite the strong anti-racist education and culture in the West? If racism is unnatural, why is it the default state of all cultures worldwide?

One of my mother's friends from back in high school is half-black and she came from what is now the Democratic Republic of Congo. She was not granted any inheritance by her grandparents in the Congo because she's half-white. She was bullied by other kids there because she's half-white. Her father was shunned by the community for marrying a white woman and having mixed race children.

Racism is the default state of Man. The most primitive and the most advanced cultures alike practice it. You cannot escape it, it's the norm around the world.

It's a basic understanding of what those natural processes are.

More self-contradictory idiocy.
You're getting very boring, very fast.
You also, frankly, don't seem to grasp the very Darwinian process you're championing.

Humans must not branch out and evolve

The races are a direct result of brwnching out and evolving divergently, you fucking mong. Race-mixing is forcing this naturally-occurring divergence to abruptly converge at a thousand little points so as to create a thousand varieties of mostly dysgenic, strange, and rootless humans with flimsy ethnic, cultural, and social foundations.

racist

Has nothing to do with Darwinism.
A white woman can prefer to live in a white man's comfortable home, binge watching Netflix, popping Xanax, driving his triple airbagged SUV, scrolling through the white man's iPhone all night....and her biology can still be crying out for the black man.
Over a long time horizon, the kind Darwin proposed, trying to suppress this is impossible.

But Darwin is, paradoxically, one of their heroes.

The lying kike? No. What are you talking about? That people were first fish, then lizards, then apes, then people?
Which means don't kill fish, lizards, snails, or any animals because they'll all be humanoids one day right?
Get out of here with that silly jew nonsense.

According to Darwin, you're absolutely correct.
Now, you want to fight nature and end this process.
I'm saying it's like fighting gravity: You might be able to do it for a while, but over a long enough timespan, it's a doomed ideology.
If you believe in Darwinism.

This is rendered false because of globalism.
Do you know what is required for the formation of distinct seperate genetic islands overtime?
ISOLATION
ISOLATION
Notice how culture, and populations, are becoming uniform all over the globe.
You have no idea what you're talking about.

I agree that Darwin was wrong.
(In fact, not only was Darwin wrong, he got it entirely backwards.)
But we're in the vanishing minority of white nationalists.
youtu.be/m7dG9U1vQ_U?si=pJP0PJu8EFQlY6MU

Tribalism is an evolved instinct because every group wishes to win and outcompete the other groups.
Nationalism is an elaboration of this instinct.
It's completely in line, and in fact the only logical outcome, of believing in evolution.
You win.
Your group wins.
Your race wins.
The rest doesn't matter.

I clearly understand it better than you.
Let's say, for the sake of argument, that you're right and most people just fucking live race mixing. Let's say it's twice as many that love to race mix vs. those that don't.
A society where ethnic homogeneity is imposed would see the race mixers either leave or simply breed less. So the genes that predispose those people to race mix will be less common in the next generation. This process repeats in the following generations until first the race mixers become a shrinking minority in the country and later they become all but extinct in the region.

That's evolution. That's how it works.

Now, you want to fight nature and end this process.

Don't worry according the Jew Darwin the apes and lizards and fish will all become people one day right? So it doesn't matter what we do.
It'll take care of itself. Humanity can be wiped out but the birdies will be people eventually right?

Race-mixing as it is seen and peddled today is in fact literally only a thing because of modern technology and modern ideology. Without easy long-distance travel and the prevalence of socially/nationally degenerative ideologies, race-mixing would essentially cease to be.

id is "dirty lying whore"

Hm.

Well I don't believe in kike Darwin but do you disagree with what I said if Darwinism is real?
If we evolved from lizards and fishes then the lizards and fishes will become people!
Eventually.

Browns and other muds are low IQ and a completely different species. Mixing with them offers no benefit to Whites. It's an upgrade for them but a downgrade for us. Beyond that, the only way to preserve bio diversity of the species of hominids is to practice species nationalism and segregation (prevention of race mixing).

ethnic homogeneity is imposed

That's evolution. That's how it works.

top kek
I remember that chapter in 'Origin of Species'!
It was Chapter 13: "On the Need of a Police State for the Theory of Natural Selection to Function"

Yeah, in essence, I'd agree that's what Darwin proposed.
(The bacteria might not evolve into man per se, but something comparable and, eventually, even greater.)
Yes, that's the theory.

If we evolved from lizards and fishes then the lizards and fishes will become people!

No. That's not how it works.

Are you retarded or something?
The government is part of your environment. It one of many evolutionary pressures that impact who does and doesn't breed.

Yea so according to Darwin it doesn't matter what humanity does because more humanoids are bound to appear anytime now!
When I go fishing I should see a few fish climbing onto land and waddling into the brush!
So exciting!

No. That's not how it works.

That's how Darwin said it worked. We were fishes, then lizards, then apes, then people!
Our apes must have recently been lizards too!
And our lizards were formerly fish!
And the apes are bound to turn into people at any time!
Or at least a comparable humanoid.
If we evolved this way then they should too.
Just have to be patient until the new humans show up.

Who gives 2 fucking shits about your evolution? The results of which won't be visible in any form for 100s of years. No one's life will be affected by evolution during its duration.
Nationalism, however is different. I am sure it's common practice for gangs of male jeets to mog and rape a single girl in India. I don't want that around me. I am sure it's common practice for sand niggers to wrap their women in burlap and bake them like Salmon en croute. But I don't want that here. Life evolved after the mini ice age, plagues, wars, Disco and other wretched things that happened to humans.
Bottom line: There's always been a fight about immigrants in the US after the majority stopped being Western and Northern Europeans. When it was Eastern and Southern Europeans, the rhetoric was similar. Failed races, conquered races, sub human, etc. You wanna know the funny part? Those voices saying those things were Progressives in the US. No fucking kidding.
I am not paying for these motherfuckers, we're full. Return to sender in the cheapest and harshest way possible. Return is immediate death.
Just fucking stop. Niggers like OP think were 5 years from Star Trek TNG and we'll fight the Klingons or some shit. We'll all die knowing that never happened. Might as well be around people we like while we're here.

The government is part of your environment.

top kek
Yes, you're arguing my point:
White nationalists/neo-Nazis must impose a government to overcome natural selection and artificially impose inbreeding.

It's unnatural....but cops and military are needed to prevent it?

Actually cops and military were used to end segregation because people had enough sense back then to know segregation was a good idea.

And yes, that is indeed unnatural. Sub saharan africans are wildlife and should have been left alone in Africa. Mass mixing is only possible with unnatural technology of today, and massive amounts of jewish funding/effort going into force mixing. I mean, look, here you are on Anon Babble putting effort into normalizing it or whatever psyop you're running here.

file.png - 1024x647, 569.12K

So not only do we need a police state to prevent white women from fulfilling their natural desires and life from branching out as it seeks random mutations....now we also have to return to the Stone Age, too.
Sounds pretty damn exhausting.
Or maybe....Darwin was wrong.

Yeah life finds a way right into not having any viable organ donors and weird new half and half diseases
Kek, abominations

Actually, speciation occurs when populations are isolated from one another; not when they all get mixed up.

You are a retarded niggerfucker.

You like to sex the monke, and you don't care how badly you have to mangle evolutionary theory to justify it.

I mean, I'd have more respect for you if you just started a thread titled

I want to have sex with animals

Or

I want to destroy the concept of race because I am a mutt

At least you'd get points for honesty.
You poor stupid faggot.

not having any viable organ donors

A race which is dependent upon endless medical intervention probably won't survive long.
It's definitely not the "favored races" who are taking advantage of their environment and thus breeding more.

And the apes are bound to turn into people at any time!

Or at least a comparable humanoid.

If we evolved this way then they should too.

No. Evolution doesn't prescribe the path any family tree will go. If niche exists animals will continue to fill it.

If I dropped you and a feral ape naked in the middle of the jungle, guess who's gonna have a harder time.

Your point is this is a "constant struggle against nature." My point is it's not. Humans already have adapted, and are continuing to adapt, to the policies of their government.

Sexual selection in a nationalist society is no less "natural" than in a liberal one.

Racial homogeneity is not he same as "stasis". You're mistaken because you fail to see and understand how the evolutionary process manifests in highly-complex organisms like humans.
Within our races, the evolutionary process is still ongoing in its naturally divergent manner, it just appears to be far more subtle and contained within the divergent travks that we have gone down. When we were simpler and less diverged, the process was more outwardly obvious.

I mean, think about it. The process never really walks back along a successfully divergent path, right? That isn't considered being "static", it is literally just evolution.

So not only do we need a police state to prevent women from fulfilling their natural desires

Women and their "desires" are irrelevant here. They weren't even allowed to vote a century ago, for good reason. They are not as intelligent as men, and yes, their desires were suppressed for most of hominid history, for good reason. There have always been laws in place to keep women from ruining a society. They're really just supposed to rear children and be around the house; their desires are only entertained by men but are mere suggestions.

Also, at least where I'm at mixed kids are not common at all. Mixed species couples are the exception rather than the norm. I rarely see half niglets. But yeah, if a White woman wants to race mix she's already dumb as fuck and brainwashed by jews. Whatever has to be done to revert the damage jews have done needs to be done. Be that military, political, walls, a holocaust, etc... I care not.

specieation

ACKSHULLY, faggot, specieation occurs - according to evolutionary theory - upon random mutations.
Changes from geographical isolation are merely changes within the phenotype, and revert back when the variants are reintroduced.

No. Evolution doesn't prescribe the path any family tree will go

So no animals will ever become human again?
Just us? That seems highly unlikely.

All animals alive today have been evolving for just as long as we have.
Humans are as equally unlikely to have ever occurred as any other species on earth.

Certain individuals of a species sticking to their own is just another facet of evolution. Tribalism is not in spite of evolution, it's a part of it.

According to Darwinian theory, this is correct.
Obviously, mankind will soon evolve into something new, unless the neo-Nazis can use the police state to prevent this.
Again, if you believe in Darwin.

All animals alive today have been evolving for just as long as we have.

Yea except we humans according to Darwin came from fish, the lizards, then apes, then people.
In fact fish shouldn't exist at this point.
They should have all become lizards or evolved. Lizards should have become something like apes.
And where's the missing link?
The half breed animals we should be seeing wander around?
The monkey lizards?
Where are they?
Where's the skeletons?
Where's the evidence? They call that the missing link for a reason.
We evolved from fish but then most fishes just evolved to be fishes?
Where's my gills? Why can't I breath under water what's the evolutionary advantage in losing our ability to breath under water?
I should be Kevin Costner from Waterworld with webbed feet and gills.

a shitty thread died for this equally shitty thread

Yeah, most of anybody sticks to their own.

Evolution

Replacing your people with niggers and jeets

50ekqa.jpg - 634x394, 44.15K

Indeed, where are the monkey-lizard skeletons? I ask myself this every day.

White women's greatest chance for INDIVIDUAL survival is by clinging to the white man's gibs.
White women's BIOLOGICAL greatest chances are in fulfilling the Darwinian imperative to branch outward.

Shit. I'm almost starting to believe in Darwinism, as I type this.

mankind will soon evolve into something new,

More likely than not. Unless our lineage goes extinct before that, of course. No firm timeline though. How long have sharks been around?

unless the neo-Nazis can use the police state to prevent this

You keep harping on this strawman. The allele frequency of the population will, of course, change. In a nationalist society, those alleles that are better suited to it will become more common. This is exactly the same process that happens in a liberal society but with a different set of alleles.

Worthless cope. Evolution shapes decision making. Humans are tribal because its an advantage.

Evolution

A natural process wherein endless police, military, bureaucrats, and sociologists exist to artificially impose breeding patterns on biological entities which otherwise reject them.

White women's greatest chance for INDIVIDUAL survival is by clinging to the white man's gibs.

White women's BIOLOGICAL greatest chances are in fulfilling the Darwinian imperative to branch outward.

Well and that's what happens. White men are more likely to race-mix. What point are you even trying to make here, if any.

Yeah, most hardliners are intellectually compromised and cannot reconcile the various paradoxes their ideologies contain because they believe that ideology predates nature, as opposed to the reality that most people do what they were always wanting to, they just assemble a framework after the fact for rationalizing and explaining their decision-making.

You're not wrong but you could be more right. The whole reason for evolution is survival aka adaptation to one's environment. If the adaptation aka racemixing was found to be a de-evolution and be harmful for the future of that collective organism, well what does the body do? It sends in white blood cells aka bloodstream nazis to seriously fuck up the maladapted cells/virus. Being 'racist' is a collective adaptive reaction to a negative evolutionary line trying to infect it.

OP is a pajeet
lol trying to talk about evolution lmao
the world's most stagnant, backward excuse for civilization that never amounted to a hill of feces without some foreign leadership
OP is a pajeet

Yea except we humans according to Darwin came from fish, the lizards, then apes, then people.

Fish are a diverse clade. In fact, they're polyphyletic. There are species of fish that are newer than the earliest mammals.
This shit ain't Pokémon. Species aren't "leveling up" to some sort of higher clade. They're diversifying. One species of boney fish ended up waddling on land and adapting to that life style. Other fish stayed in the water and adapted to that lifestyle.

missing link

Transitional species? Like lungfish? Or bichirs? What about mud skippers? Olms?

One species of boney fish ended up waddling on land and adapting to that life style. Other fish stayed in the water and adapted to that lifestyle.

So that's where mermaids come from!

Nah, that was drunken sailers fucking manatees or some shit.

you just didn't see her hot human half hidden under seaweed u guys

after all our adventures now you doubt my word

ted wuh.gif - 512x512, 755.97K