Screw Palestine or the State of Israel. Bring back kingdom of Jerusalem!

Palestine and Israel was a mistake. The true Israel belongs to Christendom. We need another crusade to eradicate the whoring degeneracy that made the west a complete filth. We do not need Sharia law nor do we need whoredom that will destroy our people. Deus Vult! Ave Ave Christus Rex!

Cringe christcuck wishfull thinking tough talk

not happening nigger

sandnigger desert land so holy

Fuck off, just go live in the christcuck quarter of jerusalem if you love it so much.

All christniggers should be deported to Israel.

no need to force Sharia while still keeping women modest.

no more porn or prostitutions that encourages degeneracy.

no more refugees flooding the west.

It's a land worth nothing, but truly worth everything because it is the root of the souls of the majority multitudes. Hence why establishing the Kingdom of Jerusalem makes sense. Why bow to the Jews or Muslims and let them rule the holy land when we could?

nah
BRING ROMAN RULE TO Syria Palaestina province
Get rid of abrahamism
Re-Build the Temple of jupiter optimus maximus in Aelia Capitolina (jerusal-eem)

No mercy will be showed
Hadrian will not stop
Until the entire destruction of Judea

Based.

fencesitting

It was always called Palestine, and Christians coexisted in peace for centuries, then the jews got uppity.

Byzantium, the Eastern Roman Empire, Eastern Orthodoxy, was never responsible for any of the crusades.
The Emperor warred against the moslems, but the crusades were a catastrophe of entirely Latin design, and the Latins treated Orthodox Christians worse than they treated the Saracens in many cases.

The problem whit bizantines (eastern romans) is that they become quite weak overtime, fighting always the zaraoastrians sassanids (persians) before the arrival of islam (this is important) the last period of importance of the eastern romans was whit belisarius, wrecking germanic barbarians like the vandals in north africa, lombards in italy, visigoths in southern iberia even franks in marseille the empire was already at its peak, but shit happens
The best roman empire was under emperor hadrian-marcus aurelios and trajan, and was during its "pagan" period

Nah, Palestine was the name given by the pagans who did orgies.

Sharia law is based though.

during the 6-7 centuries to 10-11 centuries muslims and jews worked quit well together hand to hand, The jews opened every single eastern roman city to the muslim invaders during the islam expansion (same whit the already declining zaraoastrian persians) that were fighting the eastern romans for nearly 600 years, become to weak to adress the arabian question, and christianity over all the empire weaking it just became a gate for disaster to happen

I am down for a crusade. I hear that there is a lot of rape and plundering there

But the pagan period died earlier than the Christian one. The Christian one was the final Roman empire that stood longer when it was established. The only reason why the Byzantines got weak is because they didn't really have powerful allies. But now with Christianity being well established and that majority of the historically Christendom nations are some of the most powerful in the world, Byzantine in the modern era makes the most sense than a Pagan empire.

Abrahamic Christian rule will eradicate degeneracy

It’s never done so even once.

But a bit too crude. A Christian establishment would be just as effective without needing to be as crude of a rule as Sharia. Hence, saving and time effort while being efficient.

But with modern tech, it'll be possible. It wasn't done because Christian kingdoms didn't have the tech capability to do so. Now we do.

The Levant is rightfully Babylonian soil, give it back to them.

Based

Byzantium, the Eastern Roman Empire, Eastern Orthodoxy, was never responsible for any of the crusades.

They literally begged the west for military aid against the Muslims. They provided ships, set up supply depots, and fed and housed the crusader armies on the march east.

You're a kerala christpoo.
Show your flag, nigger.

thats the problem, you see
My reasoning of christianity is that its Lore and core teachings are fundamentally tied to judaism (moshe, genesis, the davidic line, the bible) its entirely a middle eastern semitic religion, just like islam is
Old roman religion is quite similar to Greek religion, Whit their own lore and cosmovision of the world not tied to judaism or hebrews, nothing.
The roman empire became christian oficialy after constantine in 313ad did the milan edict, basically formalizing roman christianity/catholicism
Its quite complex the why of the roman society leaving behind their own faiths to convert to this new judean sect at first, but eventually took its own course separed from judaism, but alot of it is still there

Christian kingdoms never had any desire to eliminate degeneracy. They were rotten from the top down, including the official state churches.

With modern tech and military, pretty sure a modern Byzantine can crush all caliphates in today's world.

True to some extent, but with today's tech, they would be forced to be more transparent, so movements to eradicate degeneracy under the Christendom would ultimately be inevitably necessary to keep things going smoothly.

No, they’d just make it easier to keep the most corrupt asshats in power.

The reason why the bizantines fell behind everyone is their attitudes towards tradition, they didn't evolve their weaponry and constumes, basically become a stand-still from the 8-15 centuries
The turk otomans were not afraid of introducing new weaponry and tactics, even using outsider tech, like hungarian cannons to take down the walls of constantinople
Funny thing is, this same curse caused the decline of the ottomans, they stagnated and didn't evolve military and lead to their demise in ww1, becoming easy prey for anglo-jew interest

Yes, but one cannot deny the vast powerful influence of Christendom all over the world. Hence, why although not so feasible back then, a modern Byzantine is more feasible now due to the great influence in the past that shaped today.

Byzantium was irrelevant most of its history, they spent like 500 controlling nothing more than the outskirts of Constantinople.

Kill every christcuck and christcuck larper

But I highly doubt that attitude towards tradition with regards to technology and military would be something that'll happen to a modern Byzantine. Especially, when it should be obvious to them that this type of attitude towards tradition in regards to technology and tradition has failed them before.

No, Babylonian inbred pagan degenerate mutt culture can stay dead.

Inbred AID lovers like you are the reason why another crusade needs to happen.

The Byzantines were under constant sieges by the Muslims, so the crusades were initiated.

false, they were relevant, until the venetians sack constantinople, after that they would not get up back as easily
The bizantines ruled the eastern trade, until the venetians and milanese took it from them, and then the ottomans closed the gates to india/china, creating the reason of explorers via sea
Sure it is, a bizantine empire would probably comprise alot of christians from orthodox to the eastern chuch, but its been so long and populations have new nationalisms (like turkey) alof ot hem have greek ancestry mainly on shores, but they are now muslim
they had good ideas, like greek fire, way too advanced, but over time the recipe became lost , if they adopted gunpowder as extensively as the ottomans, its quite posible they would had last even another 200 years, considering they also had support from all the other christian nations (before the creation of protestantism ofc) when that happens, it all just went downwards for everyone

Well, Christianity is still the biggest religion, so we have the numbers to establish a powerful Jerusalem kingdom under Christian rule. When it comes to tech, modern nations that are historically Christendom is by far the most advance, so an establishment of a Jerusalem kingdom is more feasible then before.

christianity just like islam has divisions, in islam there are two ways as far as i know the sunni and shia, but the christians have the catholicism core, eastern orthodox church and then the protestants (and their wannabe denominations)
Judaism is quite funny, idk how many divisions has, but judging from israel conservative parties, there are still jews who want a king from the davidic line lmao

Crude how? Explain it.

Shias are basically a nothing burger unless you are talking about the state religion of Iran which are scene as heretics by the vast majority of Muslims.

I like modesty, but don't like to have hijabs forced like Iran. At the same time, I don't like having Christians being at the risk of becoming second class citizens.

I almost forgot, food options might be limited too under Sharia law. Other than that, Sharia law does have based aspects too.

you can also say kosher, after all, it all cames down to the nose lol
israel, a jewish quassi ethnostate, see how they treat christians during their holy procesions, its quite depressing
Christians are seing as a whole as heretics by hardliner jews
and the clothing, that depends alot, christians as a whole used to have modesty, but now they dont care at least the western part of christianity

I know the hardliner Jews spit on Chrisitans, and clothing use to be more modest within the Christendom. This is exactly why the Kingdom of Jerusalem needs to come back.

Christianity is pretty divided with over 40000+ sects. However, despite the existing hostility that still exist, we're not as hostile as before, but rather in better relationships with different denominations than before. It's why a Byzantine would be a good idea. Besides, many Christians want unity as opposed to division, so a Christian Byzantine is feasible than ever before.