Is evolution the biggest lie that we’ve been told?

If you think the earth is really flat maybe the lie that it's a globe is bigger?

The rock that killed the dinosaurs was actually the spaceship we arrived in.

This is true but it only applies to White people, hence why White people are so interested in space and astronomy.

a magical sky daddy

The Satanists can't help it but show their brainwashing that was installed in them from childhood.

The existence of a god is.

Is evolution the biggest lie that we’ve been told?

No.

Otherwise, explain niggers, abbos, slavs, orientals, and americans.

I mean........ vatican jesuits did a marvelous job brainwashing these.
What do you think is all this satanic brainwashing about you will die, unlimited wars, killings etc. etc.
why is this.

it's human nature to kill each other another jesuit lie

you are sinner - another jesuit lie

Try again.

DAILY REMINDER THAT CONSERVATIVES WANT TO STOP HUMAN EVOLUTION

The biggest lie is obviously the holocaust

Proponents of evolution tell me I'm the same species as all of those things though.

Essnentially.

Human body is one of the few hybrid engine bodies on earth.

it can use any food, and it can be fed by electricity so it is a pure hybrid engine

Human brain is MARVELOUS unique thing.

Humans have at least 18 (and not 5) senses - schools lie as usual.

Lots of lies coming from vatican jesuits and euro globohomo about humans and human bodies, to make you think you aren't the creator.

can be fed by electricity

qrd

Leftist retards think LGBT++ , faggots and mass killings of unborn babies (abortions) is a human evolution.
No, it's degeneracy / Regression / Devolution.

just like abos are likely regression.

Arh.....
So. Human body is designed to produce massive amounts of work on a very tiny amount of energy (low watts input).

What is also likely that human body isn't consuming oxygen when you breathe (3 barriers in the body tell modern scientists that oxygen can't get through).
What is likely is humans consume IONIZED particles (i.e. electricity ) while breathing .

Crazy things have been identified by some people as of recently.
For instance there are people who run 10-20 kilometers (10 -15 miles) each morning and barely eat anything.
While continuously maintaining their body mass.

which is crazy and any modern athlete will tell you that you need to consume 4000 calories

but you don't.

peaked in 1000BCE-1000CE

look totally retarded now

What happened?

no, the biggest lie was that god isn't real and that hedonism was a great replacement for righteousness.

The globe is a bigger lie.

Evolution is the only reasonable explanation for racial differences.

Just realize that future chad enhanced humans will look back to you and think of you as a tribe of niggers in africa with bows and arrows seething at a helicopter flying overhead

The more evolved they get the whiter they get

I see nothing lying about that

it takes way less time obviously

booba

Women didn't get attractive until 1000 BCE

That's kind of bullshit.

enhanced humans

satanists and their AI controlled human bots

that they can remotely control , make vote certain way.

and beam ads directly into their human bots brains

You should read my posts above:
Human body and human brain is SO MUCH stronger than you can imagine right now that your brainwasher's and controller's fantasies aren't going to be implemented.

It's over for the satanists as soon as we release free energy tech.

This is highly interesting. Where can I learn more about this? A book perhaps?

Humans have at least 18 (and not 5) senses

You're referring to things like proprioception (body position), balance (equilibrioception), temperature perception (thermoception) etc.,. Couldn't all these be seen as subdivisions of the tactile sense? So all those other senses could likewise be categorized as subdivisions of the principal five.

At the end it's how humans interpret they're own man made words..
In the methaphisical sense of evolution, God created life from nothing, that itself is evolution..
There was nothing and God created atom, carbons, micro organisms , animals , rivers, humans and all that.

Words are just the "meaning" people put in it, our communication is not even logic at this point.

I am so sick of retarded faggots like you that don't know the difference between selective breeding and evolution.

Care to propose a better mechanism?

I HAVE A TAILBONE OK?!? I JUST DO

I guess we did not evolve beyond pitty intellectual debates, maybe you prioritize intelectual vanity over a communication common ground where humans evolved enough to the point that they don't have wall to debate.

But we couldnot expect much from a non evolved species of homo sapiens primtive brains.

Obvious not genralizing since some humans seem to seek balance and rational free thinking

Yes,
Just an EAR has 3 different senses -
1. hearing
2. your 3D orientation / gravity (if you notice humans slightly move when they stand somewhere) , and
3. Angle Velocity (if an elevator drops or you move in a car etc. )

Also, Metalloproteins - say that we can identify electrical and electromagnetic fields.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metalloprotein

animals can change quickly in a relatively short time

but this can't happen to a larger degree over a much larger amount of time because... it just can't okay????

A bird evolved into a bird (not even a different bird just fatter) wow I’m convinced I’m a soulless monkey now

a book

There are no books right now, but if you follow the latest trends in medical science...

you also have to read between the lines and combine that into your own knowledge.

Also, most modern medicine books will be full of chemistry, which isn't correct.

as I said, there are 3 barriers in the body for an oxygen to get transferred into lungs,

so something else is clearly going on which is different.

No, it's still more plausible than any "miracle

Are you talking about a rock becoming a fish?

So what she look like 100,000 years in the future? 1,000,000?

only black people come from space, yt are a yakubian abomination

vatican jesuits

OK buddy. The Vatican secretly controls the world, and the Vatican is using that power to tear down Christian values, make a mockery of Christ and the beliefs they derive their power from, and to place Jews in every position of authority through out the world.

Or maybe it's just the fucking Jews you absolute retard.

Things evolve. If the bird generates more birds when procreation, that itself is a result of biological evolution, biological technological evolution actually.
Because biology is technological also, we just exted that techology buy building computers and stuff using the technological elements of biology , combining natural biological elements that were present way before humans even existed in the cosmic map

Is the same shit. Now multiply to 1 million years.
Do you think the birds will look the same?

Funny but we humans tranformed the rock into a computer

youtube.com/watch?v=vuvckBQ1bME
Maybe evolutions is manifestation of natural elements and transformation?

evolution makes you whiter until 2025

b-based?

the 19th century raincoat

Why can't I marry a snusnu cave woman from 100000bc

gets whiter

oy vey propa racist bollock innit?

she returns to monke

Now multiply to 1 million years.

Do you think the birds will look the same?
yes and so does “science” that’s why they keep pushing the age of the earth back. Millions of years isn’t nearly enough so they made it billions.

No, Christianity is.

Funny but we humans tranformed the rock into a computer

yes that is creation. what’s that have to do with evolution the claim that nothing created things.

That's the dumbest attempt at an example I have ever heard. A human life span is not long enough to "see" evolution. Humans haven't evolved in any appreciable way since writing existed. There is no way to quantify evolution on such a short scale.

Yes, we didn't evolve from fucking rocks or amoebas.

Look through research articles then? I guess this also means brushing up on a bit of biology as well.

what’s that have to do with evolution the claim that nothing created things

It's vague and scientists knows this , deep inside they know that not 1 single humans has any clue how all this started .
If they claim to know they are lying to themselves and to others.
No matter if they either believe in God as the creator or evolution coming from nothing, like the big bang theory , that the scietists already change they're ideas from that one

Give you 2 more.
In the NOSE , there are 2 different senses.
1. Smell , and
2. Sexual organ that identifies female / male pheromones and identifies if you can have good children

in some people this receptor is huuuuuuuuge as all they think is about sex.

Hands have over 30 different receptors, etc.

I understand atheist that just reject logic can accept evolution but how do. Christians? Man is made in gods image where on that animation did the monkey turn into an image bearer

2.5 million years of evolution
still no tail

Basically meant to say that not 1 single humanoid knows shit..
No matter if they use God or science as justification.
Humans are merely exploring..
But yes humans already evolved in the scientific field, not gonna deny that obvious .
This species made progresses

How could evolution be a lie dude ?

Look through research articles then?

Yeah, you kinda have to identify people you can trust .
You can watch some YT videos of people with education - like doctors , but not mainstream doctors as mainstream is corrupted by Big Pharma money

whos goal is to sell more food and more drugs.

That's not evolution you fucking retarded mental midget.

Evolution, the origin of species, is meant to explain the creation of new characteristics in response to environmental changes, not merely changing the ratio of already existing characteristics.

For example, if shart-mart installs chainsaws at the entrance to its store to chop off the head of anyone over 6 feet tall, and as a result manlets dominate the earth, that is not evolution because manlets already existed. You aren't creating new genes and characteristics, you are just changing the ratio of characteristics that already exist. On the other hand if people develop a thick bone plate on their forehead to protect them, that would be evolution because people with mountain goat foreheads do not currently exist.

Bigger birds in response to a change in the food supply ain't evolution because bigger birds already existed beforehand. It is changing the ratio of pre existing genes, not creating new ones. Even if evolution does occur, it is a process that takes millions of years. It is not physically possible for those kinds of genetic changes to take place over one or two generations. It defys everthing known of molecular biology and physical chemistry. You are getting your understanding of mutations from X-men comics.

you are just making shit up. evolution can absolutely be changes in ratio of genes that are already expressed in a population.

Do you believe one kind of animal turns into another from evolution like a pinecone giving birth to a chicken?

we have discovered self-replicating molecules. abiogenesis is still a 'developing' field but you can hardly at this point say we have no clue at all about the origin of life.

the OP using an AI video to say evolution is fake is a bit silly
when AI uses "random mutation" to produce a greater complex whole based on probability in this case it forms humans from pixels

if you actually had good reason to doubt evolution you wouldn't have to strawman.

yes, absolutely, if you go back far enough we share common ancestors with birds, fish, monkeys, you name it.

just go outside and you can see it in realtime
the nigger ancestors that go monke didun nuffin around and the current black people that do stuff like any other human

Okay. Who created the birds, fish, and monkeys?

Do some research, retard. Evolution is just "descent with modification." Researchers released some Italian wall lizards on an island with no insects. Then they went back a few decades later and the lizards had developed a cecal valve, bigger heads and stronger jaws that allowed them to survive by eating vegetation. There are wolves in British Columbia that eat fish exclusively, and they are adapting by developing webbed feet, like an otter.

Now consider that genes are mutating all the time and some people over 6 feet tall barely survive the chainsaw because they happen to have a random mutation that makes their forehead resistant to the chainsaw.

Basically there's a bottle neck to survival like a password that needs to be unlocked and nature is brute forcing the password by trying every type of combination possible. why is this implausible to you?

No, and the natural sciences do not contradict to the Word of God.

The natural scienced the beauty of God's creation. If you can't reconcile the two, you need stronger faith.

Humanity obvious has done great research, i love geology, biology, all the scientific fields .

But in my opion humanity is a like a baby giving it's first steps into the cosmos intelligence .

So for me I have no doubt that humans so far don't know much yet, specially how they were designed in the first place ..

The only way to reconcile them is ignore "the word of God" in the Bible because it contradicts observable reality.

Grammar corrections.

No, and the natural sciences do not contradict the Word of God.

The natural sciences reveal the beauty of God's creation. If you can't reconcile the two, you need stronger faith.

what? you mean who created the thing that we commonly descend from? ultimately we are descended from self-replicating molecules encapsulated in polymers. imperfections in the self-replication process "mutations" are how these structures changed over time and eventually become cells. then, from that, more complex forms of life.

you can read the wikipedia page on abiogenesis if you are interested. the field has grown substantially but certainly more research is still needed.

christcucks are already bad, american christcucks are all insane

if you actually had good reason to doubt evolution you wouldn't have to strawman

Is that a strawman to say a plant gave birth to an animal? How did it happen then? You know if the chicken and the egg question destroys your worldview that doesn’t make it a strawman.

all they will tell you is that these are changes in a "kind" of animal and demand you show them a dinosaur giving birth to a chicken.

I find the convergent evolution between brazilian giant otters and crocodiles interesting

NOOO THAT DOESN"T COUNT

Kill yourself jew.

you didnt ask the chicken and egg question you asked me if i believed that an animal could, in one replication cycle, reproduce into an entirely different animal which is clearly nonsense and nobody has ever claimed such a thing.

Give you more ideas.
Look at this:

Sodium–potassium pump

Even if both K+ and Na+ ions have the same charge, they can still have very different equilibrium potentials for both outside and/or inside concentrations.

The sodium-potassium pump moves toward a nonequilibrium state with the relative concentrations of Na+ and K+ for both inside and outside of cell.

Export of sodium ions from the cell

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium–potassium_pump

Basically inter cellar transfer.
Some people who feel low energy all the time may be low on various IONS.
Or low on sodium or potassium - lots of those.

There are wolves in British Columbia that eat fish exclusively, and they are adapting by developing webbed feet, like an otter.

Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say they are developing webbed feet like a golden retriever (also a canine) can you give us a more pertinent example of one species evolving into a different species like a wolf evolving into a turtle

Where in the “evolutionary” development of man did he go from an animal monkey to an image bearer of god? About what year?

evolution is very self evident

look at me i beliebe the opposite of everything im told. hehe im such an intelligent dissident!

no you're a contrarian dipshit

That is the chicken and the egg question. How did an animal that reproduced by some other means lay an egg to reproduce that way in 1 generation? Or did they slowly start making eggs over multiple generations and keep reproducing by splitting like an Ameoba in the meantime?

yes, the creation of eggs is something that happened over a multitude of generations and reproduction and there is nothing wrong with that.

Wouldn’t the eggs be like the vestigial argument? How would it be an advantage for natural selection to produce eggs for multiple generations, maybe thousands either no befit be using those calories for reproduction or storage?

Oops auto correct
Organism A reproduces and creates no eggs and uses all calories for reproduction or maintenance
Organism B does all the above but uses 10% of its calories to make eggs that won’t be used for reproduction for a thousand generations
How is organism b “fitter” for survival over those generations?

Thanks. I'll have to add chemistry to the list.

It's the only thing that makes sense. The evidence for it is strong.

You tell me, nigga.

You are Japanese.

Any books I should read this thread related?

just trust me, goy

Humans did not evolve from any kind of ape if that's what you mean. Other human-like hominids have existed forever but were wiped out by homosapiens and neanderthals through Darwinism or survival of the fittest. These other species we're descendants of ancient gods who attempted to create a being in their image, which spectacularly failed, unlike the descendants of adam and eve (the white man). Jews are neanderthals which on average had a higher form of society and IQ which on it's own disproves evolution.

Bro you do NOT want to see what everyone is going to look like in just 200 years, don't even begin to fathom what it'll be like beyond that

goes from shitskin to white to shitskin

Science is a study field, it's something that when put in practice for example by humans, the studies tend to expand into new "discoveries", new theories .

Basicaly science is just a tool, if people use it wrong occasionally, you cannot blame the field of science but the ignorant mind behind it, same goes to religion.

But in my opinion religion is not even a valid studie, it's just a collective emotional construct , like hive brain thinking, imagine thinkking spirituality is a case study. This is why I will never take religous people serious

The Bible book of genesis

Darwinism or survival of the fittest.

What does this even mean ?

You mean survival os the most adaptive? Because you do know even aphex predators can go extinct right?

Yes how is it the most adaptive to waste calories on producing eggs they aren’t used for reproduction for hundreds of generations?

Yes.

No in the most literal sense it means we genocided them all in great wars spanning 30,000 bc and beyond. The jews suppress the majority of history and expect you to believe their narrative because they seized control of press sometime before christ

ultimately we are descended from self-replicating molecules

And what created the self replicating molecules?

Adaptation might be the ultimate capacity of existence itself.
Life is regenerative. When a star "dies" it's chemical elements are transformed/regenerated into a new adaptive manifestation of the cosmic intelligence

That's assuming human life is the center of existence.
And it's not

HOLOCAUST

monke
monke
injun
mestizo
greek
English woman
English woman
monke mestizo

we're going backwards

the biggest lie that we’ve been told

6 gorillion

WMDs in Iraq

circumcision is good for you

American biology classes are just real bad at teaching their students about evolution, methinks.

…why? I can put a bag on her head

niggers constantly post about obviously wrong conspiracy theories so that the category as a whole is debunked by association

hmm you think the jews are promoting ethnic replacement?

that's just a conspiracy theory

let me guess, the earth is flat and men lived alongside dinosaurs? hahaha

notice the pattern and excise these retards from your life

It would make sense had there not been things that are evolutionary ailments be passed on and prevalent today. The same goes for stupidity leading to passing on genetics. You would think from an evolutionary perspective you would want your people to be more intelligent. Yet people who are dumber usually breed more !

right back at ya you fucking dimwit. religion is satanic brainwashing

Of all systems of philosophy which start from the object, the most consistent, and that which may be carried furthest, is simple materialism. It regards matter, and with it time and space, as existing absolutely, and ignores the relation to the subject in which alone all this really exists. It then lays hold of the law of causality as a guiding principle or clue, regarding it as a self-existent order (or arrangement) of things, veritas aeterna, and so fails to take account of the understanding, in which and for which alone causality is. It seeks the primary and most simple state of matter, and then tries to develop all the others from it; ascending from mere mechanism, to chemism, to polarity, to the vegetable and to the animal kingdom. And if we suppose this to have been done, the last link in the chain would be animal sensibility—that is knowledge—which would consequently now appear as a mere modification or state of matter produced by causality.

Now if we had followed materialism thus far with clear ideas, when we reached its highest point we would suddenly be seized with a fit of the inextinguishable laughter of the Olympians. As if waking from a dream, we would all at once become aware that its final result—knowledge, which it reached so laboriously, was presupposed as the indispensable condition of its very starting-point, mere matter; and when we imagined that we thought matter, we really thought only the subject that perceives matter; the eye that sees it, the hand that feels it, the understanding that knows it. Thus the tremendous petitio principii reveals itself unexpectedly; for suddenly the last link is seen to be the starting-point, the chain a circle.

You are welcome.

Electricity forms in the body this way too.
Body is 75% water, H2O.
Water splits into H+ and HO- , differently charged IONS.

Happens everywhere with water.

ions , just like electrons (-) and protons (+) attach to each other.

O2 (-) is what people need - latest research thinks this .

not just regular oxygen, but O2(-) ions.

Apes evolved from US

I never said that. Human life is a divine creation which acts as an embassy for the heavens. We are not the original incarnation or concept of life but we are the perfected form of it most suited for this world because we are a literal mirror image of God. Everything that came before is beast and everything after a perverted attempt at perfection

Body is 75% water,

it still blows my mind actually, pretty impressive since we only feel the flesh fsnd the skeleton for most of it, and not fluid like water

A lot of the time who gets to reproduce is chosen by one trait or maybe a couple of traits and their negative traits get overlooked and passed down. Intelligence isn't really necessary for survival, instinct works just fine and often times better for most creatures when it comes to avoiding early death, so it's rarely selected for by most creatures. In fact, intelligence is pretty worthless to most creatures, what would we even be able to do with out intelligence if we had paws or fins instead of hands? We'd have practically no way to make use of our intelligence beyond what all the other animals can do. Even with our intelligence and our hands to use it, smart people are often debilitated by their intelligence when it comes to taking action in the real world, they overthink all of their opportunities away going over the pros and cons 100 times over while the idiot next to him has made leaps and bounds by just taking action. As far as furthering a species goes, intelligence isn't very useful without absolutely ideal conditions to make use of it, which is why humans are the only truly intelligent species on the planet, and even then we're just intelligent enough to be able to realize 99.9999% of people aren't able to utilize their intelligence for anything significant anyway.

TLDR Intelligence is overrated when it comes to reproduction

You must unlearn the atheist agenda

I cannot speak in entity of God cause it's man made word used to define a possible entity that would be the ultimate creator.

I think it's intelectually dishonest using the term God to describe something we did not created, that we never had capacity to created and yet for some odd reason we think we fully understand it to the point of making 1 sinlge word as the absolute truth, as far I'm concerned the word God could be subjective to many means or other words. You could call God , hyper intelligence instead , or the original atom, but for some reason it's just God . God what? A cosmic intelligence? Does it have a specific biologicval format?Does it have a methaphysical shape the resembles a entire universe? A non visible energy?

The year will be 4.000 in the future and we will be still asking the same questions

Evolution is obvious, but it's always been misrepresented by people other than Darwin when applied to human prehistory and the scientists have overworked the findings regularly to come up with wild theories that fund research but mostly appeal to vain political notions.

Consider the current view that there is several species of giraffe in the wild. While we might consider the likelihood that there is several "ethnicities"of the species, we overkill the variations and engage in far to much make-work on the subject. Either come up with clearer definitions for a species or stop trying to entertain idiots who would be happier to be seeing arena battles between robo-apes and robo-giraffes anyway.

Holohoax

Covid

Christianity and Islam

Things about World Wars and NS/Fascism

Things about our ancient past

"OnE rAcE tHe HuMaN rAcE!"

The tunnels were just to ampliate our synagogue, goys, and were made by just a bunch of crazy young students... nothing to see here.

And a lot more.

There are two types of 'evolution'.

Eugenics and Dysgenics.

Intelligence is whhat created you in the first place.
You reproduce and die , to further meet with the intelligence

evolution is just things being better

Nope its who passes on their genes. Doesnt matter how strong or smart you are if you dont have kids. That genetic code of strength and wits is still dead.

Uhh, no.

I guess to put it another way, what are you gonna do when you get caught off guard by a wolf, are you gonna try to debate with it? Convince it you're not worth eating? Are you gonna share your personal philosophy with it? You're dead. The big strong dunce who's willing to pick up a rock or a pointy stick and bash the wolf in the head is much more likely to survive the encounter and live to produce and protect his offspring. The mindless fearful idiot who spotted something scary and bolted in the other direction and was fast enough to escape danger before it noticed him will also survive. The 130 IQ physics PHD student will be lunch. You don't need very much intelligence to stay alive and reproduce. Actually, let's just disregard external physical threats altogether. Smart people understand children require lots of time, attention, and resources to raise optimally, and have fewer of them as a result of knowing this. Stupid people just fuck raw whoever lets them fuck and end up with twice as many kids. Again, intelligence was not only unnecessary, but counter-productive to reproduction.

that's assuming humanity is the center of existence
You are not the creative force of existence just cause you reproduce like rabbits.
Remove your genetics and your presence from the cosmos, actually remove humanity from the cosmos and see how life keeps regeneratiing and evolving .
Life is regenerative. When a star "dies" it's chemical elements are transformed/regenerated into a new adaptive manifestation of the cosmic intelligence

And yet retards somehow think eating vegan and goyslop is actually good for us. While we havent even adapted to agriculture yet.

But you are just a human, just like the wokf is just a wolf, in the end neither human intelligence or human brute force insticts will make you survive to your biological limitation that is mortaity .

How many years you have left before meeting the intelligence ?

Tick tock

Have you ever looked at a seal and then looked at a dog?
They just look like ocean dogs.

Why would god make the earth in such a way where it looks older than it actually is?
Is he some kind of trickster deity?

you are so retarded lmao
don't bother responding, I've no interest in your kvetching, just letting you know low-IQ you sound

No he is truth. You deny him, you deny truth, and you ask why things don’t make sense to you?

seal looks like a puppers

Ok you proved it lol

Something being plausible doesn't make it true.

Jews

higher form of society and IQ

Imagine believing that. Jews are nepotist retards who use the former trait to compensate for the latter. Retarded ceo saars are doing the exact same thing right now.

evolution has gone too far

The theory of evolution is definitely true and has been scientifically verified... on small scales. (just think of the selective breeding of animals, which humans have been doing since forever).
The theory (as conceived by Darwin) has been disproven on large scales (million+ years timespan). Study of fossils show alternating phases of long periods of stability, with little change in species, intertwined with moment of sudden and rapid change, with new species appearing out of the blue (i.e. the infamous cambrian explosion). This fact is at odds with the "gradual change" hypothesis, which is a keystone of the evolutionary theory.
That being said, the theory of evolution is held pretty much as a dogma of modern scientific discourse, for political rather than scientific reasons.
Darwinism acts as a sort of philosophical justification for anglo-style liberal capitalism.

I gibs dna

the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form.
Based on this definition of evolution it would seem to me that you would want things to be smarter!

How do you account for the fact that animals existed before humans and they died.
If there was death before humans even existed it kind of debunks the Adam and eve narrative that death only exists because of humans sinning which makes the whole purpose of Jesus pointless.
How do you explain this?
I guess you could explain it by saying God just made it LOOK that way to test us for some reason even though the Bible says he wants us to get to know him and that nature "declares" the existence of God.
So why would God do this? It's deception, I thought god couldn't lie and he wanted us to know him. Why would he make the earth in a way which leads us to believe the Bible isn't true?
Is he some kind of trickster?

I'm not really trying to argue any kind of philosophical point here, nor am I trying to argue against intelligence, I'm just explaining to the guy I originally responded to how evolutionary ailments can be passed on and why intelligence isn't the primary trait that all life selects for when it comes to reproduction. Basically I was saying what said but way more long winded. Although, to address your response to him here I would say that humanity may not be the center of all existence but it IS the center of our human existence. Although I see you're arguing more about the importance of humanity in the broader scope of existence as a whole, which is an entirely different subject than whether or not evolution is a lie.

You do realize that humans have eggs, too, right? The difference here is between laying them or keeping them inside the body until a viable offspring has formed. How is it inconceivable that a set of species might go from simply laying eggs and abandoning them (like with some fish) to laying eggs but keeping them around (like chicken) to "laying" eggs but keeping them on their bodies to "laying" the eggs inside the body and giving birth to viable offspring?

There's no such thing as a debunk of evolution, evolution is backed now to the point that it's an entire field of science. The core of the theory is so thoroughly proven that there's simply no reason to humor your bullshit, especially when it has a 99% chance to be a western-centric christian hot take as if religion is to be taken at face value without verification. You wanna talk about lies?

That's why it's believed. If the earth is flat, that justifies alllll their other crackpot theories on the nature of the world. Too bad they can't get past step 1: literally any positive evidence of a flat earth that isn't the bible or staring at the horizon as if their assertion it's flat makes sense.

Seriously think about it, why would the *horizon* be flat? If it's perspective and your eye can only see so far away, by definition the horizon should be circular as you see slightly further in the center of your vision compared to the edges. The edge of the flat earth would need to be circular too. The only way for a flat earth to have a fully flat horizon is if the earth was infinitely large or square/cube shaped.

picrel

The easiest flat earth debunk is simply the position of the sun in the southern hemisphere. If the sun is southwest in the sky, then all these countries can look the same direction to see the sun(as the sun shines parallel rays), but it's completely fucking broken on a flat earth. Same applies to all celestial bodies, the fact that the south cross can be seen in the south no matter which direction south is completely and utterly destroys the concept.

This is the dumbest shit i will read all week.

another retard who doesn't know the difference

pottery

Redpill me then Mohammed.

Yeah fish just decided randomly that they wanted to be on land for some reason. And we know what happened billions of years ago because we just know!

Religion is not ant it will never be a science, how can one take religion serious when each religion has it's own theory and the monotheistic ones using the word God as spiritual supremacy above free thinkers .

When they have the intelectual dishonesty of even making a mockery of God by claming that one prophet is on heaven with 72 virgins or the other messiah walked over water and turned water into wine as if Jesus was some magician.
It's not a science it's imaginary, like dragons and elfs.
Religion is just manipulated psychology, arcaic psychology study that failed due to inconsistence and intelectual limitation , it's not a science like math, geology, biology , and other scientific fields

the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form.
It seems from this definition that evolution is supposed to be a progression. What makes the 130 IQ individual any less able to survive than the other two. Also natural selection is just one way in which things evolve! There is also genetic drift, mutations, and gene flow. Meaning that the will to survive isn't the only driving factor if a trait will survive!!

Evolution makes the claim that nature is able to make life forms more complex and give them brand new features. Observable and replicable selective breeding only ever enhances some preexisting features at best.

The earth is 5000y old. Humans were made 1-2 days after animals and fish.
Before you lol at God remember you think a chicken was walking around before an egg existed.

What are you saying chickens used to give birth to live babies but then started to push out the eggs before they hatched? That kind of makes sense but still doesn’t answer how the first chicken gave a live birth to a chick (before they “evolved” to not give live birth) before the chicken itself was born.

There's no such thing as a debunk of evolution, evolution is backed now to the point that it's an entire field of science

So was alchemy

Is that really all that hard to believe?

There's plenty of examples of amphibious animals. There's plenty of examples of animals which will go out of water for safety or food, and into water for the exact opposite reason. Examples might be the flying fish, or the mudskipper.

And we know what happened billions of years ago because we just know!

Well what we do know is we only find fossils of certain animals in very, very old layers of rock. And that there is a linear trend of similar animals all morphing into different shapes over time. Unless you seriously want me to believe god made like 9000 different lizards and then stacked them in the dirt in a consistent order just to fuck with us.

It’s so funny y’all parrot exactly what the government teaches you in their schools the govt is the highest power there is nothing above the laws of man.

free thinker

No, the biggest lie is that what we evolved from were blacks.
At the time of early hominid migrations out of Africa, the ice age was still in effect, there was exactly zero need for melanin rich skin, there was for hair.
Black skin is a more "modern" development, around 50.000 years old, resulted after the ice age ended and desertification expanded further from the equator, meanwhile some fossils found in greece date back to even 200.000 years ago.
At the time homo sapiens with brown skin started emerging out of africa, other continents were already populated to various extents.

Thanks for confirming you're a retard.

Literally all of science disagrees with that.
So to think that's true you'd have to think that all carbon dating and geological data is not accurate because God designed it that way to trick us or something.

Why would God do this? That doesn't sound very benevolent.
I mean the concept of a benevolent all powerful all knowing God is kind of ridiculous anyway since the Bible itself says that most people go to hell.
Meaning that God creating this world will end in a net positive of total suffering.
How is that benevolent?

LMAO at your retarded ass. Enlighten me, abonigger, where was I wrong?

Alchemy made no claims it knew how to make gold, and never did. It evolved into chemistry because we first learned the reactions of the chemicals we had, then we applied much later atomic theory to prove our findings with math and logic.

I don't even get what you're trying to say, that alchemy was wrong? It had fundamental misunderstandings, but it didn't ever claim these things were true without evidence.

alchemy

that is basically chemistry, it's not named alchemy anymore cause down to earth individuals gave it the true meaning of science study beyong dragons and wizards fairy tales

the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form

Ah entropy

The governemet that by suprise happens to be the most stronger entity representing God lmao

Ok bud , preach more sista, cause I'm the parrot right
pic related

Entropy only applies to closed systems. A cell is not a closed system, it takes in energy from other sources(plants, animals, the sun, etc) and that allows it to perform work on itself. The idea that entropy means everything gets more shuffled guaranteed is a gross oversimplification.

Same species, different phenotypes.
They aren't the same thing.
In acknowledging these differences, we should probaly realize that conflicts based on race are retarded, and fucking stop mixing with each other.

All creationists need the rope.

sorry wrong image lol

God designed it that way to trick us or something.

“The science” told you to spray your mail with Lysol and hide in your house getting vaxd every week. Anybody that still trust “the science” over god is beyond help

Every woman after 1000 BC could step on my face.

alchemy evolved

lol

And then they need to use it to hang retarded söyence goys.

What claim does evolution make again?

That the entertainment industry is intentionally dropping in quality to make distractions from family politics less prominent.

Biggest lies ranked:

1. The holocaust
2. Federal reserve
3. Evolution
4. Space/moon landing
5. Covid

And remarkably all of these lies can be traced back to the jews and lie number 1.

Intelligence is typically a beneficial trait to have, but the most important trait for reproduction is having the ability to survive long enough to find a viable mate to reproduce with in the first place. You can be as smart as you want but intelligence is useless on its own, you'll need the capability to take advantage of that intelligence, and again, having the ability to avoid the main sources of death are vital to being able to take advantage of your intelligence. That's why things like size, strength, speed, and aggression are almost ubiquitously selected for by nearly every species on the planet. Second would probably be things like generosity and the ability to cooperate with others. Intelligence is tertiary at best. To put it in video game terms it's one of those traits that's not really useful until the mid to end game. Humanity is only just barely entering the mid game where intelligence is starting to become more beneficial than those other traits I mentioned. As for the rest of the living beings on Earth, they're still in the early game as far as that goes and as I mentioned here most of them may be trapped in the "early game" simply because most creatures lack the anatomy to make use of higher intelligence even if they did have it. Although octopi are pretty intelligent, perhaps even more dexterous than we are, and have been in existence MUCH MUCH MUCH longer than humans have and yet we've never seen them really building or practicing science or taking full command over their environment in the way humans have, maybe being underwater makes resource manipulation/extraction much harder and that's why, or maybe what we typically consider "intelligence" is something uniquely human. I've often wondered if humans were able to take advantage of our hands and opposable thumbs because we're so smart or if we're so smart because we were able to experience and learn things through the use of our hands that other creatures simply couldn't.

We're going back to the antivax shit? I'm still waiting for everybody to drop dead. 3/4 of all adults in all first world countries took it, population growth was unchanged. Even if people were 'getting vaxed every week', who the fuck cares considering it was self evidently harmless?

not a closed system

Please tell me you have faith in the belief of “infinity”

Read my comment again you dementia patient. I didn't tell you to ask me questions, I told you to explain where I'm wrong you retarded abonigger.

God told you that you will have 72 virgins in heave according to God, cause God is Allah it seems and has 2 billion followers lmao

Ok bud

The other way around. As I said, imagine a species just spraying its eggs somewhere and leaving. There might be individuals of that species that don't roam as far after spraying laying its eggs, and the offsprings of those individuals might have a higher chance to hatch safely (maybe combined with other traits, like just being slightly bigger). Over time, the genes responsible for that behaviour (or linked to it) will start to dominate. This can go on and on, until the individuals don't just not leave, but actively protect their clutch. This can have other benefits, too, like laying eggs earlier, or giving the eggs more time to grow etc.

Then, some species might start to carry around their clutch with them (in pouches, on their skin, on their belly...). Slowly, the location might move fully the body.

We don't go from a single individual laying an egg to the offspring suddenly giving birth to live offspring, and nobody ever claimed that. It's a slow, unsteady, uncertain process that can have all kinds of twists and turns, depending on the environment etc.

1000 AD women's fashion peaked. the 1900 outfit is so ass and modern clothing is hot as fuck but tasteless.

effectively harmless

Can you present this “data” in the form of a cost benefit analysis? What is the harm of the vaccine vs the benefit for say me. 25yo had covid and “the science” told employers with over 100 it was mandatory.

I knew covid was fake because I'm not a retard.
You can go out and learn about carbon dating and run these experiments for yourself. Just like you can look at data of COVID and form a conclusion.
I'm not telling you to blindly believe what scientists say.
However you blindly believe in whatever your book says even though we have evidence that contradicts it.
We have no evidence that contradicts carbon dating amd geology other than creationist saying "we have no idea if atoms decay the same way over time"
But if we assumed atoms and rocks didn't decay consistently that brings us to the conclusion that God made the decay rates inconsistent on purpose to trick us. Because there's no natural explanation as to why atoms or rocks would decay in different ways thousands of years ago than they do now.
The only way you can explain it is that God changes the laws of physics just to mislead us.
Making him not "all good"

His right the study evolved to a actual study of scince based on biological facts and not wizards and dragons, turning rocks in gold and stuff like that

So let me get this straight.
Evolution is the idea that extremely complex biological functions (that build upon eachother and rely upon eachother) came from random genetic mutations which appear in 0.01% of hosts and kill or deform the host 99.99% of the time.

Do I have that correct?

I already said understand the concept. What’s the competitive advantage for a species to evolve from not egg reproducing to using eggs if they have to carry useless eggs for generations while “evolving” vs the other non mutated that don’t waste calories on eggs?

I suppose a more proper term would be an isolated system. All systems interact with one another to some extent. The universe itself is expanding, and will eventually become cold with no work. The universe experiences unstoppable entropy.

But a small system like the earth? We're being blasted with brand new energy to replace what we lose out into space. It is not an isolated system, and even though the sun will one day burn out, for the time being it provides us with entropy-stopping power.

This is thermodynamics 101 dude

Evolution doesn't always select for the 100% best trait. It only selects for the trait that works. It's a random unguided process which means you will get outcomes that are not 100% efficient all the time.
Evolution doesn't lead to what's perfect. It only leads to what's "good enough"

Seriously why are creationists this uneducated.

I suppose a more proper term would be an isolated system. All systems interact with one another to some extent. The universe itself is expanding, and will eventually become cold with no work. The universe experiences unstoppable entropy.

Ok I also enjoy science but let's face it nothing of this is proven yet .

It's a theory and not factual data that cannot be contested

Did you read in your book that carbon dating is accurate?

Carbon dating is somewhat accurate because we are able to determine what the ratio was in the unobservable past to a certain extent. By taking a carboniferous specimen of known age (that is, a specimen which we are able to date with reasonable certainty through some archaeological means), scientists are able to determine what the ratio was during a specimen's lifetime. They are then able to calibrate the carbon dating method to produce fairly accurate results. Carbon dating is thus accurate within the timeframe set by other archaeological dating techniques. Unfortunately, we aren't able to reliably date artifacts beyond several thousand years. Scientists have tried to extend confidence in the carbon dating method further back in time by calibrating the method using tree ring dating. Unfortunately, tree ring dating is itself not entirely reliable, especially the "long chronology" employed to calibrate the carbon dating method. The result is that carbon dating is accurate for only a few thousand years. Anything beyond that is questionable. This fact is born out in how carbon dating results are used by scientists in the scientific literature. Many scientists will use carbon dating test results to back up their position if the results agree with their preconceived theories. But if the carbon dating results actually conflict with their ideas, they aren't too concerned. "This attitude is clearly reflected in a regrettably common practice: when a radiocarbon date agrees with the expectations of the excavator it appears in the main text of the site report; if it is slightly discrepant it is relegated to a footnote; if it seriously conflicts it is left out altogether." (Peter James, et al. (I. J. Thorpe, Nikos Kokkinos, Robert Morkot and John Frankish), Preface to Centuries of Darkness, 1991)

What makes the 130 IQ individual any less able to survive than the other two.

On its own, nothing, all other things being equal, the more intelligent individual would be the most likely to survive. Unfortunately, things are rarely equal in life and intelligence on its own isn't as useful of a survival trait as other more physical traits. But I agree, evolution is extremely complex and there are a lot of factors that go into it and I do think intelligence will become a more and more prominent trait for humans to select for as intelligence seems to be the kind of trait that compounds upon itself as time goes on. At first it's practically useless, so it doesn't get selected for very often for most creatures, but once you reach a certain point with intelligence it suddenly becomes more useful and from there the more intelligent you get the more useful intelligence becomes, but it's a big gamble to rely too heavily on intelligence too early on without having other beneficial traits to ensure survival and take advantage of that intelligence with.

Evolution doesn't always select for the 100% best trait.

It's actually even more resilient than that, since life/evolution/existence sees potential in the smallest detail even in a grain of sand in the desert, or such a small creature like a worm

science evolved from dragon worship.

science last common ancestor is dragon worship

science is based on dragon worship

Yes and they all happened at the exact same time in 2 individuals Crichton next to each other who bred.

Down's syndrome is a living example of evolution in humans.

It's not about producing vs. not producing eggs, remember, human females produce eggs, too, they just keep them inside their own body. For evolutionary advantages, it depends on the environment, but in my example, I brought up that staying closer to your eggs can increase the likelyhood of your offspring actually hatching and surviving.

we have RUINS OF CIVILIZATIONS older than 5000 years.
I'm not going to waste my time explaining why that's bullshit to someone who thinks the earth is only 5000 years old.

I can agree that intelligence isn't one of the main features that people look for when engaging in relations. Although I think what you are calling intelligence in this case is actually consciousness!! The fact that humans are the only ones aware that they are apart of a bigger system allows them to participate in building or practicing science!

First of all science is a study, it was not created by humans in the first place, it's something that represents the knowledge of biological existence and opens a path to study natural elements and natural manifestations.

It's a tool , a study , it's like a mathematical formula present in the chemical composition of a cloud of sulphuric acid for example

I write in caps, that means my claim is true

Lol, the state of reddit söyence goys

Evolution is the idea that small changes happen in offspring, and that the more useful ones over a large period of time will express themselves in the greater gene pool.

Both of these are proven concepts. Endler's guppy is a good example, selectively breeding guppies which allowed him to control where the spots on a guppy end up. Other adaptations are often observed, such as the shape of a bird's beak reflecting their food supply. Less subtle changes provably occur too, such as an animal's stomach adapting to its food supply to get better nutrition from it. Why wouldn't this also apply to an animal's reproductive systems? Evolution will slowly change it to favor its unique circumstances, and given millions of years, will prove to now be incompatible with its distant ancestors. This can be seen in horses, donkeys, and zebras for example, they do not produce viable offspring. More distant relatives are not compatible whatsoever.

Your posistion is it took hundreds or thousands of generations to switch from whatever into an egg based reproductive species and the whole time using that extra calories on making eggs that served no purpose didn’t put them at enough of a disadvantage that the other creatures not wasting energy on useless eggs couldn’t out compete them?

I can't really say that I have any proof that most animals have consciousness, but I do believe this to be the case. I don't think we're the only ones aware of ourselves and our surroundings, but we certainly make use of this awareness in a way that's extreme and unique compared to any other creature on Earth.

religiontards still cannot argue against these 4 little birds

kek

another retard who doesn't understand the difference between adaptation and evolution

KEK

I’m asking before any animal ever laid an egg they reproduced some other way. Then they developed egg laying ability, over how many generations? Over all those generation the eggs weren’t yet reproductive just a calorie drain

consciousness

Would you say a desert has consciousness or a river?

Are we facing different "dimensions" of consciousness?

So much for carbon dating lol. There are no civilizations more than 5000y old.

Right I get that someone explained it like a video game. Where intelligence although it is a good characteristic to have I wouldn't dump all my points into it at the jump. It really is something that has to be paired with something else for people to find its use. Maybe that is because people all see themselves as above average intelligence so they don't really think about that not being an option! Intelligence isn't going to be your #1 Thing in your hotbar, but works well when paired with something else!

Science existed before humans? It’s a physical thing that evolved from rocks?

Is evolution the biggest lie that we’ve been told?

It's on up there.

The reason you are in the position you are (ruled by jews) is because you adopt the same old hollywood nazi tropes and continue to underestimate them all the way until your country is gone lol. They were designed to be perfectly adapted to conquer here by their father satan, who is the ruler here. They can't be defeated by conventional means and the only true way is through the unity in re-establishing a connection with our divinity. They are simply better than you because they were created that way, as predators. Humans have a higher potential but all of that has been suppressed by morons like you stuck at square 1

I like #4 when it evolved from a bird into a jalepeno pepper bush

She will also be incredibly overweight and covered in scribble tattoos and smell like death

If a mammal becomes adapted to have a more robust birthing system(more chromosome pairs, different shaped dick, larger/smaller birth canal, etc) then it eventually becomes a new species because it is no longer compatible with the other descendants of its common ancestor.

If you admit to adaptation you also admit that evolution makes perfect sense. Evolution is nothing more than so many adaptations that a bird stops being able to be called the bird it was.

Yes if it was possible to change from one kind to another that would be evolution. That’s a tautology

Why do you feel the need to misrepresent the argument? You know nobody says that already. You're doing your own cause a disservice by using retarded ridicule and straw men instead of logic

Doesn't really explain it. All it explains is they are still missing something whites and Asians have. Out of all races the only two that left the stone age and don't have ppls still living in huts or uncontacted tribes are the ones who have asain in their race name. Blacks still have uncontacted tribes on that one island and Spanish still have uncontacted tribes in the rain forest

BCE. jewish feminist anti patriarchy shit. Opinion disregarded

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cradle_of_civilization

Theres tons.
I guess geology and archeology is wrong too. BTW where's the geological evidence for a global flood that destroyed everything?
Where's YOUR evidence?
All creationists do is try to poke holes in scientific theories but I never see any positive evidence for their claims.
Do you have any positive evidence or are you just here to argue philosophy of "DURRRRR HOW CAN WE KNOW THE VARAIBLES ARE CONSISTENT". When in your worldview the variables should be consistent because if they weren't god would be actively trying to mislead us.
Why would a perfect all loving God that wants us to know him do this?

They are simply better than you

Humans have a higher potential

The cognitive dissonance with you...
See, Jews are low IQ retards but they're incredibly effective at nepotism and cheating. Humans have empathy and compassion, which are undeniably virtues but they can be abused. That doesn't make them less intelligent. Also fuck your chutzpah, dumbass, keep sucking jew dick if that's your thing but don't push that retardism on me.

Science represents the chemical biological elements presents in everything .
How can someone create science if atoms already existed before humans?

It's just a study and a very valid one unlike metaphysical studies about having 72 virgins in heaven..

Oh but wait you are with the other God not that one, sorry is confusing there is one God but you guys present the entity in many different formats.. You are the jesus side rigth the one that leeds you to heaven but with no virgins, not the 72 virgins side of God , sorry it's confusing

One population of animals no longer being able to reproduce with a related group of animals doesn't proof evolution. Saying "but it did make a new species" is just semantics, you need to show it evolve into something more complex.

You do not think animals can evolve from one kind into another? They just can have bigger or smaller beaks etc? Is there a universal common ancestor for birds and jalepeno pepper bush?

No, you have the development of sexual reproduction at some point, but "egg laying" isn't something distinct from live birth, as I said, we humans "lay" eggs. It's simply the female egg and the male sperm combining to create an offspring, whether or not that happens inside the female or outside or anywhere in between. If you ask me about how sexual reproduction itself came to evolve, that is a good question we only know little about, like when it happened and the potential advantages of meiosis vs. mitosis.

labroots.com/trending/plants-and-animals/22414/fruit-flies-evolution-gradual-process

'Kind' doesn't mean anything. Your assertion is that birds are always birds, ignoring that birds themselves are a vast array of some-compatible, some-incompatible species. The fact that only genetically similar birds can interbreed is evidence that kind doesn't matter, since birds themselves are too different to all be called the same thing.

BTW where's the geological evidence for a global flood that destroyed everything?

Where's YOUR evidence?
Every culture ever discovered has a great flood story

Honestly, I don't know. There are plenty of people out there who would say they do, I'm pretty sure that's the basis of animism, the idea that ALL things have consciousness. I'd lean towards saying no though, I think just living things are conscious and I think there's higher and lower orders of consciousness where humans are probably, although perhaps not definitely, at the top. I don't really have much to say on the subject of consciousness other than I don't really know beyond my own hunches.

Right I get that someone explained it like a video game. Where intelligence although it is a good characteristic to have I wouldn't dump all my points into it at the jump.

That was also me. I've really been enjoying this subject so I've been in here for hours now, but it sounds like you're getting what I'm saying.

Do you have any positive evidence or are you just here to argue philosophy of "DURRRRR HOW CAN WE KNOW THE VARAIBLES ARE CONSISTENT". When in your worldview the variables should be consistent because if they weren't god would be actively trying to mislead us.

I already debunked you. I posted the peer reviewed article above Carbon dating only works if you already know how old the other samples in the same layer are. If you send in a sample and tell them it was found in x layer, then send part of the same sample and say it’s in y layer you get different carbon dating results.

Even AI shows peak humanity at ancient greece

Moron

My evidence is that there is no geological evidence in the layers of the earth to point to a global flood that killed all life on earth except for a single family on a boat with 2 of every species of animal on earth

If me and everyone in your neighborhood told you some peoppe broke in your house and stole a bunch of stuff but then you examined your house and saw nothing was moved or taken what would you believe?

Science is a description of reality. Who was describing reality before humans?

The scientific method typically involves the following steps: make observations, ask a question, form a hypothesis, conduct experiments, analyze the data, draw conclusions, and share results

Who was using this process?

No worries I have the same questions as you probaby

I think just living things are conscious and I think there's higher and lower orders of consciousness

Exacly how I see it that is why I asked if the desert or the river has consciousness.

and this is also how I see the cosmos and intelligence

How did sexual reproduction evolve? How many generations did it take? Did 2 organism randomly mutate into sexual reproduction males and female at exactly the same time or they had both reproductive systems available for generations?

Adaptation is evolution now? Lmaaao wtf???

muh barely related comparison

If some niggers showed you a bird and told you it's the first of his species with wings but they have no evidence for that claim nor can they show you how a flightless species develop wings, what would you believe?

since birds themselves are too different to all be called the same thing

You are a taxonomy denier now?
Remember the SAT
Dog:wolf :: cat:
A. Zebra
B. Crow
C. Pine tree
D. Lion

haha ... HAWK TUAH and evolve on that thang!

what would you believe?

I wouldn’t believe the guy who said I had to be locked in my house corn3 years for a virus with a 99.999% survival rate for my age cohort especially after I already have it. You’re a known liar. I’ll put my full faith in god over you any time.

Fossil record.
Genetics.

yeah dude theyre just low iq parasites *takes bong hit* totally not actively aligned and communing with ancient metaphysical forces which have kept you imprisoned for most of history

Kek

It's not barely related. I'm pointing out it's fucking retarded to believe what people say over evidence that you can examine.
The fact that you can't comprehend that proves Benjamin Franklin right when he said Germans are swarthy and not white.
You're probably a Muslim shitskin invader anyway which is worse.

Based.

Is there a universal common ancestor for birds and jalapeno pepper bush?

Yes. Being a plant, a jalapeno is in the kingdom Plantae. The first plant obviously has no animal ancestors, so we gotta go back further. And you use this god of the gaps ideology to attempt to disprove evolution, because if it's really fucking far in the past, surely it's impossible by virtue of you don't know, right?

But you asked for the common ancestor, which would be the eukaryotes. So there's your answer. But your straw man of people thinking plants turn into birds is retarded.

Dude, what does your esoteric believes have to do with whether or not they're retarded parasites? They can be retarded parasites and at the same time collude with whatever evil forces you believe they collude with. Hailing satan doesn't make you a genius, rather the opposite.

“There is none beside me.
I am the Lord, and there is none else.
I form the light, and create darkness:
I make peace, and create evil:
I the Lord do all these things”

Thats your "trustworthy god".
Okay keep denying reality and live in fantasy land. Whatever helps you stop touching your peepee so much

All claims and 0 proof. Theres not a single study sayng Ashkenazis have a high amount of neanderthal genes.

Why are you mad then? Over millions of years it’s perfectly possible that a bird can evolve into a jalepeno. You sound like you are denying evolution.

Science is indeed a study that only humans use at least in this planet.
But science is also indeed observation, I don't think it's necessary a human creation cause it's a observation reflex like a animal observing the weather conditions .
Science is part of the biological mechanism of existence , it's not something necessary physical as a object or human flesh, but a extention of consciousness .

By this I mean it's a study , it's not a creation , because you study atoms or whatver chemical composition but you never created them in the first place

what about it?

only good post ITT

says the guy that thinks God made people out of dirt with magic and then they talked to a snake

Lol

(((Evolution)))

(((Atheism))

(((Neo-Paganism)))

(((Judaism)))

(((Anti-Catholicism)))

(((Islam)))

(((Protestantism)))

(((Anti-Orthodox)))

(((Atlantis wasn’t real)))

You literal niggermutt, the flood happened thousands of years ago and there's evidence for it in the form of everpresent flood myths across all known cultures, who according to modern söyence weren't in contact for those thousands of years. That's different than believing something that allegedly happened just recently. You retarded muttshit, you have more melanin in your little finger than all of my family tree combined. The fact that you believe your retarded surface level analogy makes any point at all ironically makes that point that you're a braindead retard who can't discern sophistry from real arguments.

Over millions of years it’s perfectly possible that a bird can evolve into a jalepeno.

Nope, birds are too complex and too different to go backwards like that. A eukaryote can develop into animals and plants, though. They're both eukaryotes to this day after all. Wouldn't you call that a kind?

But evolution can do something kinda-sorta similar too. Take bats for instance, developed from rodents but share traits with birds. Or perhaps Carcinisation

Crazy, I haven't seen a single actual argument in this thread showing demonstratable proof of one species changing into another species. Seems like evolution really is a lie, huh? CHRIST IS KING.

Fact check he only made man from the earth women come from the man which is why they are below him in authority. .

people had a shared myth so that means it MUST have happened it's not possible that they were just stories inspired by ice age regional flooding and spread through trade. No there MUST have been a global flood that we have no evidence for because people came up with a myth a few thousand years ago

Who's the real niggermutt?

Evolution is one way? What happened to the vestigial organ theory?

Bigfoot is the missing link scientists try to hide from you.

Half-assed AI animation of evolution

can barely keep the gender straight

walking gait stays almost the same

AI art is literally going to kill the last remnants of critical thinking.

Strawmanning much? Where did I say MUST? We were arguing whether or not there are grounds to believe it.
Also

muh caps means I'm right

Your literal plebbit tier söyence niggermutt.

Who's the real niggermutt?

Still you, dumbass.

Of course evolution is one way, there's also convergence though. If two different species have the same environmental stresses, they will evolve in similar paths to solve the same issue if that was the only way forward. But evolution can't work an animal into a plant, because there's no feasible way for that to be more advantageous than doubling down on what it's already specced into.

But evolution can't work an animal into a plant, because there's no feasible way for that to be more advantageous than doubling down on what it's already specced into.

That’s not true “climate change” if that were real could make certain plant life much more competitive than say a polar bear. Is the no return journey thing just lord of the rings seeping in or is it an official evolution rule that if something is more complex (like humans having tails) they can’t loose complexity?

You don't need to witness the genetic trasformation of a species to prove evolution.
And since when you cannot denny previous science theories? Science is exactly , a long term process of erros and bad calculations to reach valid conclusions.

Not a short term gateway to heaven with 72 virgins btw your messiah jesus is heavily quoted in the Quran

Kek white from 1CE and then changes to a nigger in 2025

scientists still cannot explain this

I just wanted to say that the video is not accurate
that person would've been murdered and replaced every step of the way and they wouldn't have looked like that unless they're some prehistoric tranny that always looks like a woman

Not a short term gateway to heaven with 72 virgins btw your messiah jesus is heavily quoted in the Quran

yes he the most significant figure in history it’s why “science” uses the date of his death to mark time.

Yeah there's grounds to believe it. Just not very good ones.
Seriously. Where's the evidence other than "a bunch of people said so"
I guess half man half animals existed too. Bigfoot is real. We need to bring back human sacrifice too since it was commonly practiced throughout the world.
Your logic is flawed.
Seriously wheres the evidence of a global flood. Surely we would see it in the layers of the earth and the fossil record.

It's easy to explain with an analogy.

Lets say you're working for a truck company, making new versions of trucks. Some of the things you might want to improve upon are the demands placed on a truck's life: Fuel mileage, towing capacity, ruggedness, so on so forth.
So you try to balance all these things in your iterations. A better engine means better fuel, but maybe you sacrificed durability. You can improve durability, but now it's heavier.

But it's never in the cards to have the truck become a speedboat. Trucks don't operate in water, they tow things in rough terrain. Therefore, trucks only become better at towing things in rough terrain. There's no pressure for it to learn to float, replace its tires with propulsion, etc.

There ARE land animals that returned to the water, but it's rare. And they still only did what was necessary, they didn't develop gills and instead learned to hold their breath better, because evolution finds *a* solution and not *the fish's solution*. This would be equivalent of adding better seals to the truck door so it can ford a river. But it was never an option to redesign the truck into a boat, that's not iterative or the quickest path to the solution the truck needed.

The Big Bang or God. Doesn't really matter what you subscribe to because the end result is that people do share common ancestry with animals going back millions and possibly billions of years.

Perfect analogy. If the environment changed; say we had a war and all the modern highways got destroyed we would regress from modern fwd low profile tire cars back to older mechanical 4wd high sidewall tire trucks.

Notice how the same people who believe in bullshit like evolution are the same people who think that the vaxx is safe. Tells you all you need to know.

No they don’t. There is zero evidence a dead rock ever turned itself into anything alive. Show me any.

a bunch of people

Literally every culture ever discovered, including all of the cultures that, according to modern söyence weren't in contact for thousands of years or maybe weren't in contact at all since they emerged
To go back to your barely related analogy to make it substancially more related, if every person you ever asked, even those who couldn't possibly have colluded with the others because they've been isolated their whole lives, if all of those people told you someone broke into your house and absolutely demolished it and looted it years before you inhabitated it, but you can't see any remnants of that happening, what would you believe?
You retarded niggermutt sophist.

No one says life came from rocks. I don't think any life could come from your brain

Creationists believe some crazy ass shit, let me tell you.
The bible for example says that over the sky-dome, there is a tremendous amount of water. This is why the sky was blue, according to the ancient hebrews.
Kent Hovind asserted that the reason there's no water up there today is because there "used to be". So he imagined a giant 2 foot thick ice sheet surrounding the earth in floating space, which then crumpled down to earth during the flood.

Dude time was being marked even before Jesus existed assumnig that it's even a real person and not just a made up spiritual avatar, assuming it was not some sort of new age messiah back in the day that was put down for some crazy ass spritual ideas and he's character being exploited and used to serve different agendas, and maybe that is why you have dozens of different sectarian Christian groups , orthodox , evangelists, mormons , esoteric christians , protestants, catholics, well you name them all my guy...

Where did it evolve from?

There's no regression in iteration, the only path is forward. A truck could find an advantage to high sidewall tires maybe, but it still came from the previous generation of trucks. There's no back to the drawing board in evolution, and those high sidewall tires are 100% distinct from the previous sidewall tires.

There's simply no such thing as regression in evolution. Just convergence. And there's NEVER a same solution exactly the same way twice. The genetics are always completely different, because again mutations are random. Animals that look and act like crabs aren't actually crabs just because of that, their genetics show where they came from.

We need to bring back human sacrifice

this.
imagine how nice it would be if we just sacrificed all the useless windbags to the sun or whatever.

Yes. By your webm, evolution implies natural eugenics, that nature naturally chooses the traits with a high success rate. However, as we have been seeing today, there is a dysgenics happening where people are breeding with others of lower quality genes, causing a devolution. It appears evolution favors the path of least resistance, and if the path of least resistance means a white woman thinking she will receive sympathy and gifts if she fucks a nigger then evolution will gift her a nigger mutt.

What year is it? What event wad year 0 of the timescale?

This is so stupid
I beleive in science as a study but i know it can be corruped same way your religion can also be corrupted by humans, duhhhh

You cannot blame the study, you can only blame the ignorant mind behind it that is trying corrupt a valid study

Science doesn't say there was no contact between those people. Migration theory perfectly explains how the flood myth spread and it even shows how it changed when it traveled around the world.
Not all the flood myths are exactly the same.
Is it more likely that maybe these people had more contact than we previously suspected or should we assume that there actually was a giant global flood killing everyone and thing on earth but we don't have evidence for it because God works in mysterious ways?
I'd say the former is more likely.

You cannot blame the study, you can only blame the ignorant mind behind it that is trying corrupt a valid study

If science was good then it would be good

No, that would be White Genocide.

reveal flag you nigger

Migration theory perfectly explains how the flood myth spread and it even shows how it changed when it traveled around the world.

You are telling us you believe people migrated 50,000 years ago and maintained an oral history of a flood even the entire time since the. Around the world? Haha
I’ll help just say people evolved to be afraid of floods because they are dangerous and that is the basis for the common mythology of a flood. Way more rational

"science" says you are the same species as africans and trannies are women

It's because we used to live almost exclusively in floodplains. Floods are deadly, but also renew the soil with nutrients since we did not understand ground fertilization yet.

You'd have to be a total idiot to not be able to form a story of death and rebirth from that

Migration theory perfectly explains

So your theory is that the flood happened back when all those people were just one? So it did affect all of mankind and all of their known world? You're conceding the whole topic?

Is it more likely that maybe these people had more contact than we previously suspected

That's what I'm thinking. However, modern söyence is hellbent to disagree.

This anon already answered for you

Science is correct.

The story changed. So it depends on what you mean by "maintain the story"
The flood myth isn't that hard to memorize and it was probably based around a real event like the ending of the last ice age that caused regional flooding so yes it makes sense why a legend like that would spread and catch on.
Someone just needs to tell it to a neighboring tribe and then they do the same to their neighbors and so on and so on until it's been spread through the world. There doesn't need to be any migration involved necessarily either. It was probably a mix of both migration and tribes contacting neighboring tribes.

We don't because science as a study and if not corrupted , has the intellectual honesty to admit it has no fucking clue.

Same way you have no clue how you were designed, in you mind you think it was God, and I have nothing to oppose if you feel that way, it's your personal choice, just don't expect me to think the same way you do, cause I don't know what is God exactly and I'm really pretty sure you have no idea either...

So far it's assumed that God is the creator the beginning of all, and that's it , there is nothing else besides that statement , no explanation the origin of God , if God was not created then you cannot have nothing more in line with evolution than that .

Basically is the same sense of evolution me coming from a monky or me coming from God

evolved > from monky (or) + evolved from God = evolution

50,000 years oral tradition only they can maintain the story but you think it’s impossible for us to translate the written bible over 2000 years lol.

We don't because science as a study and if not corrupted , has the intellectual honesty to admit it has no fucking clue

I asked you what year it is and you responded with this ChatGPT answer? If science has brought you to this of what use is science.

Same can be aplied to religion or even your god and jesus, since it's creation seems to have total episodes of grotesque aberration..

Starting by wars , beheadings and cruxifictions.. for example

How do I evolve my cock and balls to grow massively during my lifetime?

Wait I thought the earth was only a few thousand years old though.
Try being consistent.
The flood myth is only a few thousand years old by the way. Not 50,000

Just fuck deeper vaginas, your schlong will naturally adapt as to be able to shoot sperm all the way into the womb

Where are you getting this notion that we've kept the same story for 50,000 years?

"A flood happened" is not a story, it's a theme. This is like saying that Dracula and Twilight are based on the same story.

if my inconsistences make you following them through arrive at ridiculous conclusions then they're your inconsistences

Top pilpul

What chatGPT, I already told you we humans even with science or any other tool have no clue how to calculate how many years existance have.

You were the one that was talking about science using the birth of jesus as a timeline to calculate time and it's false .

Time is being calculated since the paleolithic period , but no human ever had the record of a specific starting hour

Scientists try to calculate time of the cradle , but any honest scientist would admit to you it's not a easy thing and they are not sure when the universe started

Whatever you say is moot, you already conceded the whole flood topic.

Same can be aplied to religion or even your god and jesus, since it's creation seems to have total episodes of grotesque aberration..

Wrong god is by definition good for the believers.
Atheist don’t believe their is a objective universal good/evil just your subjective preference

Meiosis evolved from mitosis. Your misunderstanding here is that you assume enormous steps without realizing the many small stages between those steps. You don't need two fully distinct sexes for meiosis, although that eventually evolved.

It’s called an internal critique I don’t believe any part of your statement I’m just pointing out that it dosnt make sense even assuming all your lies are true.
You think pre modern age the indigenous people on the various continents had contact a few thousand years ago? That’s not what the “science” says

Children are dying in wars right now and you God is watching

Have a good day and goodbye , see you in heaven with 72 virgins and jesus turning water in wine like a magician