Is he welcome here ?
Tate confirmed Anon Babble incel
Bottom G is always welcome in this prison.
Anon Babble's favorite muslim rapist
orbiters feed him relevant memes
this, he has an army of nameless validation seekers.
Hey Tate. You are dumb.
confirmed asset
Anon Babble is a handful of neet neckbeards and a few people of actual standing in society mixed toghether
This shit then gets echoed out to the wide internet and into the hands of even bigger influencers like this who then repeat it for an even larger crowd to consume
"famous' people like to stay they post on Anon Babble the reality is they have Anon Babble handed to them by others.
Anon Babble hasn't been a 'secret club' since Chanology
exhibit b
cut interest rates
deflation
Love the anon who proved that 99% of rightoids are retards that don't understand the memes they retweet
I think you meant to say that Andrew Tate is a gay nigger
He hates white people so no
No he isn't and that post doesn't fucking make sense at all. Businesses thrive in sensible, ordered and predictable environments - bandying about tariffs, talking about invasions of (now former) allies, and the other crazy shit going on is anathema to investment. No business is going to risk the billions in capital and years of time it would cost to invest in reshoring in the US. At any moment any of Trump's decisions could easily fuck you and your investments over.
YOU CAN'T JUST TAKE AWAY TARIFFS THE NEXT DAY IF THE GOAL IS TO BEAT COMPANIES INTO INVESTING IN THE US. You either use tariffs as a negotiating tool to get countries to comply with your trade arrangements, or you KEEP THEM UP INDEFINITELY to use as a stick to get companies to build in the US. You cannot do both.
And this doesn't even touch on the fact that tariffs are not incentivizing. They are not a carrot, they are a stick to punish companies until they comply. Trump hasn't promised any kind of carrot to actually incentivize reshoring. This is all just delusions conjured up by someone high on copium.
Tate is from the feds, he's a literal glownigger.
Hi guys it's me, Tate. They call me the big 'A'!
How can a jpg barely 1 month old gets so nuked by some harddrive that it looks like it’s from 1996.
to be fair, the relationship between interest rates and inflation is indeterminate.
but the broader issue here is that the Fed and the Treasury are monopolies. There is no market mechanism here, even if they pretend there is one. And I am sure they look at data or whatever.
But if the Treasury wants bond yields to be 2% instead of 4% or whatever they are, the Treasury can just do that. They can set it at 0%. They don't need permission or guidance from the Federal Reserve.
Then the question comes in if someone would buy them at that rate. Which shouldn't be a problem because bonds aren't actually necessary to finance the government, but the US has a law on the books that bonds must be sold to "cover" deficit spending.
Thats what he wanted to say
He is a jewish nigger hybrid that was astro turfed by the mainstream.
This is also why eggs are cheaoper now than they were under Joe Biden.
Stopped reading right there, bud.
Egg prices were in a bubble. He slaughtered millions of chickens due to bird flu, supply of chickens has returned to normal, ergo, price of eggs has returned to normal.
Trump didn't magically fix egg prices.
Low compression rate. But, yeah, it does look like shit.
save caps as .png. lossless
Hey andrew, where's the codebook, andrew? You and your brother tristan talked about the code, andrew. Your pajeet CIA daddy has it and you know how to run under it. How is candace owens?
Yeah no shit. We noticed after all the faggy spam of him some years ago.
Is that real? Jesus Christ the glownigger alert is about to explode
to be fair, the relationship between interest rates and inflation is indeterminate.
1. In practice, yes. In theory, interest rates are intended to counter inflation, nothing more. In reality, official inflation figures do not include food or fuel and the basket of consumables changes to be whatever they want it to be to make the Fed's homework assignment look like it's working.
but the US has a law on the books that bonds must be sold to "cover" deficit spending
The US also has a law on the books that says military action needs to be ratified by Congress.
not sure if it is still on the website, but it was from shortly after his charges in romania went away
That post has been making the rounds on conservative youtube channels today. It's not just him. If anybody cares to check the archive, I bet it will be 1pbtid
No.
Fuck tate. Fucking weirdo faggot tate is.
No. He's just a literal pimp nigger grifter. This is who they've chosen to drop real truth about women. He only poisons the well.
force American Farmers
I don't think anyone is going to force bill gates to do anything
try 4plebs
Ah, it's (you)
It's real:
x.com
It might have been hyperbole, but alternatively, he's got some real choice anti-vaccine rhetoric once it was safe to do so though and he realised the bulk of his audience oppose it:
x.com
he is working with glow people right now
Zesty grifting nigger
I am aware of the conventional wisdom around interest rates, but if you look at Japan they had ZIRP for like 30 years and couldn't inflate for shit. Now they have some other underlying things going on in their economy, but the point is that it's not conclusive.
As for the bonds, what I am saying is that the US has a law on the books that they must sell bonds to cover deficits. It's a self-imposed law. There is no natural law that compels them to do this. And in fact, they don't borrow money at all when they sell bonds. Once the deficit has been spent, by identity those reserves are in the system already. So selling bonds is just a mechanism to drain excess reserves. The government issues money, it doesn't need to borrow. The only thing it accepts as payment for bonds is its own debt (currency).
Did zog assign him to judas goat chan duty?
but he was president while egg prices dropped, ergo, thanks trump!
There's like a 40 minute long documentary on YouTube about American influence in the post-WW2 Japanese economy, so don't take anything going on there as "normal". I remember finance people in GFC days saying "look at Japan's economy, Japan's economy has never recovered. it may never recover."
Which is objectively something they were regurgitating to sound smart. Japanese people could afford homes, but it does explain their low birthrates if you take into account r vs K selection theory.
Regarding bonds, I think we agree. There's a law there but in practice they don't sell enough bonds to cover the spending, thus the deficit.
R v k selection theory is a depopulation psy-op in neoliberal mass cultures of fungible economic units
Die, jew.
No, the deficit is what they have to cover with bonds. The deficit is the gap between spending and "tax revenue". So if they have a $500b deficit, the law compels them to sell bonds to cover that sum. Of course regular people can just buy bonds if they want on their own, but that's a different thing.
What I'm saying is that it's a policy choice to sell them.
refinance the debt
Wtf does this mean? The government owes the principle back on treasury notes. You can't "refinance" these.
inflation figures do not include food or fuel
Yes they do.
I presume they mean have that principal roll over at a lower interest rate, which is something the government does all the time when it is able to.
he's not wrong
not sure if he's really welcome anywhere though
inflation figures do not include food or fuel
Yes they do.
I stand corrected. I'm regurgitating a Chris Martenson crash course i listened to around 14 years ago. I know certain countries have done fucky things with the CPI basket, however. For example, Australia swapped out milk and around that time.
I still don't believe Trump needed to be so aggressive and abrupt about the tariffs though, especially to the penguins. He should have just laid out the case to each nation in turn and worked out new deals, with tariffs being reciprocal as leverage. Why the economic nuclear bomb? Treasury bond yields were already headed down because of the DOGE cuts, deals with individual nations would have continued the trend.
the deficit is what they have to cover with bonds.
The deficit is the gap between spending and "tax revenue"
Aren't bonds just considered another revenue option? The bonds have to be paid back with interest, using taxes, no? I think that part you have back to front.
Either way, bonds are a source of credit, taxes are a source of revenue?
Was the US treasury having trouble selling bonds? I don't know.
When governments spend they issue money. When they spend to a budget deficit, they have already created those reserves in the system.