Reminder in case you forgot

The UK runs Scotland at a loss every year though

those asian migrants won't pay for themselves

Yes. If Scotland leaves the UK, the UK becomes wealthier.

Why do we need a reminder? They voted to stay part of the UK didn't they?

runs scotland at a loss

Sounds familiar. What could it be causing this?

Yeah then the Scottish National Party were arrested for fraud the very next day. We might get a court case later this year.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Branchform

How do you island niggers not get you need to be 1 country to have any relevance at all, and even then you have like nothing anymore. Trying to split up into even more impotent powerless shitholes sharing 1 island together is peak retardation... But this brought to you by the same race who fought the Troubles for both sides to get replaced by stink Indians anyway so why expect any logic from the British isles. A literal race of clowns.

No.

English natives were allowed to vote if they owned a home in Scotland, swaying the vote despite a Native Scot majority voting Yes.

Scotland is colonised by England and they are genociding the Scottish People and trying to erase their identity

not if you don't include North Sea field revenue, and you shouldn't include that revenue, because those fields don't belong to Scotland
you have a net fiscal deficit of 23.8% of GDP, if North Sea hydrocarbons revenue is excluded, meaning Scotland is subsidised by England and the English taxpayer
if Scotland were to declare independence, it would not receive the North Sea fields as part of the divorce—at best they arguably belong to the Shetland islands, Orkney, and the Western Isles, which would be made to declare independence from Scotland

try us

OP is just another anti-West shill.

In 2023-24, Scotland generated £88.5 billion in tax revenue (8.1% of the UK total). This includes both devolved and reserved taxes, with £4 billion attributed to North Sea oil revenues.

In the fiscal year 2023-24, Scotland's total public sector expenditure was £111.2 billion.

Jocks not so good at maths

Your claim that Scotland’s 23.8% fiscal deficit sans North Sea oil proves it’s subsidized by England, and that those fields belong to Shetland, Orkney, or the Western Isles, not Scotland, is a colonial distortion that collapses under scrutiny. Scotland’s 90% share of UK North Sea fields, worth £400–£979 billion since 1970, is secured by the UN Convention on the Sea (1982) and HMRC’s 89% revenue allocation (£9.4 billion, 2022-23), not detachable to islands governed by Scotland since 1469. The deficit, inflated by Westminster’s £28 billion debt interest (2020), drops to 9% with oil, and Scotland’s £60 higher per-head taxes plus £450 billion in historical industry, £15 billion agriculture, and £200 billion fisheries dwarf its £19.1 billion gap, proving it’s a creditor, not debtor, unlike England’s reliance on Scottish oil to prop up £2 trillion UK debt. Suggesting island independence echoes Darien’s sabotage (£50 million loss), a divide-and-rule tactic debunked by Scotland’s unified identity—Bronze Age trade to Bannockburn—while ignoring its legal and economic claim to fields that slash deficits and rival Norway’s $1.4 trillion fund, exposing your narrative as Unionist fiction that can’t erase Scotland’s plundered wealth (£1.165 trillion since 1707).

Your racist claim that Scotland’s £22.7 billion deficit (£88.5 billion tax vs. £111.2 billion spend, 2023-24) shows Scots’ poor “maths” is Unionist nonsense, ignoring Scotland’s £400–£979 billion oil wealth (90% UK fields, UNCLOS-secured) and £1.165 trillion in plundered resources since 1707—industry (£450 billion), agriculture (£15 billion), fisheries (£200 billion). The deficit, bloated by Westminster’s £5.9 billion debt and £3.8 billion defense, vanishes with oil’s £9.4 billion (not £4 billion), proving Scotland’s creditor status, like Norway’s $1.4 trillion surplus, not an English-subsidized debtor. “Jocks” mastered math from Bronze Age trade to Bannockburn, outsmarting colonial sleights like Darien’s ruin (£50 million) and your slur, which can’t erase Scotland’s fiscal might—unbowed and unsubsidized.

Hand back 1/4 of what we put in their coffers and act like its a favour

See also: tax refund retards in U.S.

Oh wow Im getting some of my money back!! Wooohoo

English Courts

Did fucking ChatGPT write this?

ignoring Scotland’s £400–£979 billion oil wealth (90% UK fields, UNCLOS-secured)

The deficit, bloated by Westminster’s £5.9 billion debt

Scotland's devolved government has its own debt, which it services. Scotland is able to independently take out loans to fund public spending. This is part of the devolution framework. And the current Scottish government intends to keep borrowing more, it's projected to hit £3.1bn by the end of FY2025-26 archive.is/QF3gu. For reference, Scotland's pro-rata share of Westminster debt (which it still benefits from, of course, in order to make up its spending deficit) is only £9.2bn.

and £3.8 billion defense,

You think Scotland wouldn't need to continue spending on defense if it were an independent nation?

vanishes with oil’s £9.4 billion (not £4 billion)

Even if it were £10bn, that would not cover the current spending deficit for the devolved Scottish government (£22.7bn).

I made a picture of a Scottish warrior for you.

pic.png - 1024x1536, 2.56M

scotland would barely be eligible for statehood if it were part of America (see puerto rico), why do we care about yuropoor's little family feuds again?

Lmao shut the fuck up dick head. We’re too busy genociding ourselves. Check the census data, Scotland is a lot more white and native than England

The UK becomes England.

Scotland’s devolved borrowing is tightly constrained, not independent, capped at £1.05 billion annually (£450 million capital, £600 million resource; Fiscal Framework, 2022), with a cumulative debt ceiling of £3 billion by 2025-26, serviced via Westminster’s block grant (£41 billion, 2023-24), not autonomous loans (Scottish Government, 2023). The cited £3.1 billion projection (Fraser of Allander, 2022) reflects this limit, not free spending, and is dwarfed by Scotland’s £88.5 billion tax contribution, including £9.4 billion oil (89% of UK, HMRC, 2023), which Westminster controls, echoing colonial extraction (£450 billion industry, 1707–1900). The £9.2 billion “pro-rata” Westminster debt share is a fiction—Scotland’s notional £220 billion (8.1% of £2.7 trillion UK debt) is Westminster’s liability, offset by Scotland’s £400 billion oil taxes since 1970, far exceeding the £398,085 Equivalent (£100 million today). Scotland’s deficit (£22.7 billion, 9% GDP) shrinks with full oil revenue, potentially to surplus (Norway’s $1.4 trillion fund), as independence frees fiscal levers—unlike Darien’s coerced failure (£50 million).
The £3.8 billion defense cost is a UK imposition, not a Scottish necessity; independent nations like Ireland spend 0.2% of GDP (£0.9 billion equivalent; SIPRI, 2023), suggesting Scotland’s £1–£2 billion need, easily met by oil (£9.4 billion) and whisky (£6 billion). The deficit doesn’t “persist” against £10 billion oil—full fiscal autonomy, retaining £60 billion reserved taxes (e.g., VAT, NI), cuts it to £5–£10 billion (IFS, 2023), with oil covering the rest, unlike England’s reliance on Scottish resources (20% UK tax, 1800).

He’s wearing the dye of a Jerusalem Asp! A fine picture indeed. Thank you.

English are genociding Scottish people.

You hate us.

is tightly constrained, not independent, capped at £1.05 billion annually

with a cumulative debt ceiling of £3 billion

That rises with inflation. Per the framework.

The cited £3.1 billion projection... reflects this limit, not free spending

No, it doesn't. It is the forecast data from the Scottish Finance Secretary's published budget. It is not just clarifying the upper limit, it is a projection based on current borrowing.

Scotland’s £88.5 billion tax contribution, including £9.4 billion oil

The deficit doesn’t “persist” against £10 billion oil

Revenue from NSO isn't nearly that reliable. e.g. as of '23/'24 it's down to just £6.1bn. In '22/'23 it was over £9bn. In '15/'16 it was down to just £76 million. In '20/'21 it was £0.5bn. Fluctuations in oil and energy prices for the last decade have been insane, and insisting that £10bn is a concrete, known quantity is retardedly myopic

Scotland’s notional £220 billion (8.1% of £2.7 trillion UK debt) is Westminster’s liability

Why do you think Scotland will be able to take the UK's assets with it, without having to accept the UK's debts?

Your Unionist attempt to paint Scotland as fiscally reckless—claiming its £3.1 billion debt by 2025-26 exceeds a rising borrowing cap, oil’s £9.4 billion is unreliable (dipping to £6.1 billion in 2023-24), and Scotland would inherit £220 billion UK debt without assets—is a colonial sham obliterated by facts. Scotland’s borrowing is shackled at £1.05 billion annually (£3 billion ceiling, inflation-adjusted; Fiscal Framework, 2023), with £3.1 billion a budgeted projection, not excess, tied to Westminster’s £41 billion grant. North Sea oil, securing £400 billion since 1970 (90% Scotland’s via UNCLOS), averages £4–£10 billion yearly, slashing the £22.7 billion deficit to £5–£10 billion with £60 billion reserved taxes, mirroring Norway’s $1.4 trillion surplus (IFS, 2024). Scotland’s £1.165 trillion in plundered wealth—£450 billion industry, £15 billion agriculture, £200 billion fisheries/whisky—cancels its notional debt share, claiming assets (e.g., £200 billion reserves) over liabilities

I love how the crypto jew Scottish landlords kicked the highlanders off the land and replaced them with sheep so they could make wool cloth to sell to tourists to larp as the people they kicked out to raise the sheep.

Muh heritage!

Closeted autogynophillia.
Huzzah

They give you niggers, Paki groomers Indians.
Scotland pays England 75% of hat they make and they use this money to bring in more black, brown and yellow migrants to ethnically replace the native Scottish people.

Scotland doesn't just need independence, they need a wall.

The English are ethnically replacing native Scots. This is covered in The New Highland Clearances articles. Second home owners elevate house prices and end up affecting access to service and their closures due to seasonal occupancy.

That’s an interesting assertion anon, the talmud does reference The Picts dying practices.

Ancient Jews did speak Gaelic. Your assertion on the Sinclairs is a little misguided, by shill standards even.

2

Is this enough or do you need population density as well?

What did I say about the Sinclairs? What shill standards?
You mean the sobiesky Stuarts?

You made reference to the Sinclairs and the Macleods, the highland clearances.

The shill standard of anything to do with Independence being tied to bizarre gender psyops. It’s consistent going back years now.

Great maps, thank you.

I think the kilt was a humiliation ritual. That's why the current prince won't wear one. Only the troops were "allowed" to wear it and without underwear. They were probably gay raped or something. I've spent a lot of time studying this and it all sounds like complete bullshit. There is no evidence that anyone actually dressed like that.

and we still send the money regardless

cheers, ginge. fucking chucktah!

u been doing a lot of ecosia searching, anon. well done. not a chuckta

the bagpipes are the most annoying ducking thing in the world. only a chuckta would play them. fucking drone and whine on like a proper scots woman

thats a chuckta