Based on a survey of over 100k students at 50 top colleges, the higher the college SAT score, the lower the share of conservative students.
Why is this?
Based on a survey of over 100k students at 50 top colleges, the higher the college SAT score...
Conservatives have lower average IQ than Liberals in the US.
Whites in WV and much of the South tend to perform far worse on social indicators than Whites in New England, for example.
Conservatism is inherently a retarded philosophy. "We'll do this because we did it in the past" is fundamentally idiotic in the face of a constantly changing world. It's central conciet is that appealing to tradition is not just blindly surrendering control to the past. It's the exact same logic as cargo cults, so it attracts the same kind of idiots who believe in cargo cults.
Not conservative im NS
But I have 138 iq and I never even did SAT cause I live far af away and the chances of getting in as A HuWhite are slim. The degrees are not really valued by any employer either it’s only the connections from the school that matter that are all kiked and shit skinned
Dudes will have worlds highest score endless recommendations and not get in as a White unless you are Jewish.
So I went to svhools near me
Mississippi ranks higher in education than new York and California
because. means less black people around them.
children of the wealthy who lived extremely sheltered lives
t. working class background who worked my way into their professional circles
no correlation coefficient shown
weird non-linear regression with obviously bad chi square
just a stupid scatter plot with no clear trend, if you'd remove texas there is even a subpopulation with a positive correlation
sage and OP is a faggot who does not know how to interpret data
Not saying that red states are always worse than blue states (especially if the blue state is majority nonwhite). But if you compare the social indicators of White conservatives and White libs (like life expectacy, for example) White libs are better off.
That doesn't mean their ideology is the correct one, by the way. One the long run, being conservative is more beneficial to Whites than being a lib.
The SAT hasn't been a measure of intelligence since the early 1990s. This is a commonly known fact that's easy to verify. Your ignorance of it is astonishing.
Having money in general means you live longer. And most of those leftists that push DEI and other bs profit off of it
interesting
now graph SAT scores against race
Smarter people are often more conformist or just take the path of least resistance
None of these people would want to live around niggers, which is the only political question worth asking.
I am not even talking about SAT. I am talking about social indicators like life expectancy, infant mortality, income, obesity, etc.
Well considering leftist will ruin you if they get even a whiff of non groupthink its most likely a false positive correlation
Lol
those dumb Hicks can't read or write
Kek
Conservatives are dumb people, simple as. Might as well be a measure of your ability to be mind controlled and subjugated by wealthy people.
High IQ also means higher self-control on average. The higher the intelligence the less likely you are to make a stupid decision that would result in early death, and more likely you are to make correct decisions that make you gain more money.
Of course, we are talking about averages here, there are stupid people that live very long too.
because they listen to their teachers.
Multiple reasons first SAT is being an intelligence test equivalent is a myth. The correlation is there, but not that strong and they can be gamed pretty easily – although the same can be said for pure intelligence tests to a lesser extent. Beyond that intelligence test have been artificially set (normalized) towards measuring both men and women roughly equal. Secondly minorities tend to have a lower SAT scores (certain north eastern Asians being the exception) and they usually are more likely to have conservative values. Thirdly there is a bias inherently caused in students of high quality universities. Because only those with money or with above average skills are able to get access. Hence by the prevalence heuristics of students there, people from the third world tend to not be too far behind them. Fourthly most intelligent right wings know what modern conservatism is and hence don’t agree with the label and avoid tropes and the ridiculous aspects of current „conservativism.“ Since it’s mostly a liberal boogyman and sock puppet.
That image doesn't negate what I said, though.
White libs are smarter than White conservatives.
And White conservatives are smarter than the average Hispanic and Black populations.
intelligent right wings
right wingers
Conservatives are usually retarded + higher income households are more cucked and dont have to deal with subhumans so they think everyone is cool like them o algo
All that graph tells me is that the students didn't want to publicly state that they are conservative, and they have plenty of reasons not to do so.
Cuckservativism in the context of the Jewnited states of Brazindia is just eating jewish cum, loving niggers and thumping the Torah/Bible, of course it's only for retards.
This the data is tainted by preferred bias so it gives a false positive correlation
Lmao real intelligent
Mississippi ranks higher in education than new York and California
By what metric lol
They really are smug shits which is why it so enjoyable watch the rug pull
Identifying as conservative is not the same as not being conservative.
that doesn't matter
It does, it is a massive confounding variable.
It is much more likely that conservative students simply refuse to share their opinions for fear of retaliation.
Based on a survey
That’s scientific, you even made up a graph , imbecile
Link to data or are you just a liar ?
Modern SAT doesn't correlate with IQ meaningfully because it's engineered not to since the mid-90s.
Test scores
Leftist have been living in an early 90’s
(Their peak) bubble for 30 years replete with the same talking points
it’s going to burst!
He won't because the data is all over the place; there is too much political incentive to lie and doctor studies.
Some guy called carl noah published a study that said conservatives had better probability comprehension and social intelligence and I did not join in in parading it around because I assumed it was bullshit.
Test scores
Yeah, so Mississippi is very close to dead last.
NY and CA aren't great, but they're both in the top half.
districtadministration.com
It's the jews.
We due this because it follows our core beliefs.
Progressivism is a small group of Jews and Marxist telling others how they must live , always has been , always will be.
Humans haven’t changed one bit since they’ve been on the planet.
I am not talking about SATs.
I am talking about social indicators in general (like life expectancy, infant mortality, income, obesity, etc.).
Pic related is life expectancy, for example.
forgot pic
Look at the dots not the line, they look like a blob. There’s no trend there. Would love to see the Rsquared value but they intentionally didn’t put it on the graph because it’s all bullshit to own the chuds.
I'm talking in geberal which is why specific data for every measurement in my general pool doesn't exist
Wrong. This is why I crushed people like you in college; you allowed your ability to think be captured by ideology.
You will now assume I am conservative and prove me correct.
Propaganda in the university obviously.
What exactly have I said that is wrong, though?
This and to ague that is idiotic but here we are
During our current time It is required to be “liberal” in attainment so it should be no surprise that the majority are “liberal”
Most people will go along to get along
If anything it shows how liberalism is just like every other ideology
TEST GRADERS IN THE USA DELIBERATELY GIVE WHITE CONSERVATIVES EXTREMELY LOW SCORES BASED ON THEIR HANDWRITING, REASONING, SOLVING ETC
I BET THEY EVEN GIMP MULTIPLE CHOICE BASED ON NAME
We are talking about averages retard
ALL USA TESTS ARE 1984 TIER PARTY MANIPULATION
IF THEY WERENT THEY WOULD BE 10 QUESTIONS THAT MAKE SENSE, INSTEAD ITS 50+ QUESTIONS DESIGNED TO BREAK HIGHER THINKING WHITE MALES WHILE WASTING 4 MONTHS OF YOUR CHILDHOOD OBSESSING OVER IT, AND THEY JUST GIVE STACY JAMAL RANJEET AND XIXINXAO 110/100 WHILE THEY GIVE YOU 70 AND AVERAGE YOU DOWN OVER AND OVER
NEVER SUBMIT YOUR CHILD TO THE GENOCIDE
You made a conclusion from data riddled with confounding variables.
You do not understand why that is wrong because you are a midwit.
To put it in terms of analytical chemistry, both your sensitivity and specificity are shit.
Mississippi ranks higher in education than new York and California
lol, lmao even. the story is that your state has been closing the gap in being less retarded.
You think intelligence plays no role as to way Whites in New England have better social indicators than Whites in WV or Kentucky?
yea their trend line implies that post 1600 score conservatives start increasing
which is impossible unless the trend was already starting before that
I think smart people conceal their thoughts and stupid people announce them. Universities are dominated by liberal theory by force through establishment government so obviously smart people at the university faint liberalism.
You can live your entire life not smoking or drinking and die of lung cancer or liver failure. It's also about access to better Healthcare, non Americans flying into the US for treatment being an example.
feign
I am saying predicting social ability or intelligence from all cause mortality is ridiculous.
I think you know it is ridiculous, and are being disingenuous.
You care more about about being perceived as correct than actually being correct, which makes you religious rather than scientific.
For example: I hate indians but I keep my bias separate from my thinking, which is why I don't do stupid shit like claim ramanujan was an imbecile because he died in his early thirties.
The only way to get a real answer would be to force everyone to vote, then make them take an iq test.
And cherry picking sets from a large group of pooled statistics is using anecdotes.
They lie. It's as simple as that, you don't want to draw too much attention, I would too, if I weren't liberal
Everything to do with social class interests and advantages… SAT is barely even a measure of intelligence and far more a measure of how prepared you are to game the test…
Anyway.. the enlightened leftists love their legacy admissions where their screw up children cheat somebody actually qualified out of a spot, further skewing the ideology of the system (and of course that’s principled, high IQ conduct…) Elite institutions are light aristocracies that are rigged against ordinary people… in favor of elitists (lean leftist) and minorities (lean leftist…) that the leftists delude themselves are natural aristocracies based on superiority… I’d love to see what ideological skew an actually meritocratic system would have… let’s sort out affirmative action and legacies and do another comparison
the more willing you are to swallow regime propaganda, the more ideologically aligned you are with the regime
Deep.
Easy.trainable sheeple.if you cross reference that graph with taking the vax,you will see something interdasting. m.youtube.com
Look, reducing a complex system down to one variable that just confirms your own (selfish) biases is itself not very high IQ… people like to look at results as deserved or just… but the truth is that IQ is just one trait needed to thrive… out of several that are just as, or more important… wealth, infrastructure, resources, competent parenting, cultural values, etc… you are engaging in very simplistic analysis that is essentially just assuming the conclusion you are trying to argue because it “seems obvious…” it is classic confirmation bias… and obnoxious low IQ elitism…
Negative correlation stops around 1520 SAT or am I reading it wrong?
is more convenient to say you are liberal. also, normally, these tests are trash.
I could do it back to him by saying that 62% of millionaires went to publically funded state schools while only 8% went to elite schools, which anyone could see is full of holes
more state school students than elite schools
academic post graduate pay is lower
relative level of familial wealth pre and post graduation isn't accounted for
WV is hampered by mobility and a largely isolated spread out population and of course resources
If even one one-hundredth the resources were provided for them that intercity populations get i would be willing to bet they would attain much better comparative out comes but you can’t virtue signal from the holler
but the truth is that IQ is just one trait needed to thrive… out of several that are just as, or more important… wealth, infrastructure, resources, competent parenting, cultural values, etc…
Intelligence also plays a role in many of these as well.
For example, we can both agree that Black culture in the US is in large part a result of their low average IQ.
Aren't modern colleges and universities just hubs for leftist ideologies and gender studies, handing out degrees left and right?
How many kids are conservative period?
Yeah so the argument is
Liberals are smarter because my teacher told me so
I suspect it’s not the best and brightest that cabbage onto this ether lol
Which is fine while they are busy masturbating their ego the times they are a changing
Intelligence plays a role in everything
therefore intelligence is the primary deciding factor in everything
life needs water to survive
therefore everywhere there is life is a rainforest
people who win the lottery get rich
therefore all rich people won the lottery
Go look up what affirming the consequent is.
social conditioning
the better off a family is, the more insulated they are from minority behavior.
they don't have niggers breaking into their cars, they don't have spics stealing copper from public utlities, they don't have indians willing to drive their 92 honda to pick up their daughters.
they live without the consequences of their decisions.
I know jack shit about stats and thought something was weird about what the graph was attempting to show but I was having trouble putting this to words.
Danke
you're describing judaism and catholicism. now stop bullying, you commie.
bitchute.com
Shut the fuck up you pathetic little fucking internet faggot cock sucker
I'd simply fucking kill you and everything you believe you hold dear
Because liberalism makes a lot of sense and seem almost perfect when one considers that man is a purely logic animal with no irrational side guiding his choices and actions and therefore can work quite well with intellectually superior people who do not let emotions or feelings dictate their choices, and rather base them off rationality and self control.
Conservatives are dumb subhumans
I really hate when people try to use the SAT as some kind of crypto IQ test. It is not. The SAT is just high school level grammar and math. If you get a perfect score it means you mastered everything core high school education has to offer. It doesn't mean you're some kind of 170 IQ prodigy who will change the world.
Modern 'liberalism' and 'leftism' have become the ideologies of the socalled educated elite, who have lost touch with and look down on the common working man, despite the fact that liberalism was originally founded to support him.
Nothing is dumber than the fetishization of novelty. This is new, therefore it is better. At least a blind appeal to tradition has the fact that it is proven to work, novelty has nothing but that it is new and appeals to people with no sense of self.
"We'll do this because we did it in the past"
Compare the somewhat different statement: "We'll do this because we did it for 99% of our people's existence, and maybe there is a good and wise reason why they did what they did, even though through our modern and temporally narrow lens it may seem unsophisticated or ignorant at first glance."