I asked AI how my job will evolve by 2030

And ChatGPT painted some dystopian future in which Zoom Calls would include AI people and my role would be basically to check if AI teammembers were „working well together“.

I then asked if by 2030 we thus would lose 70—80% of all jobs in Europe/US and it says this hüis highly likely.

IMG_0712.jpg - 1439x837, 192.34K

chart source: an investment firm that's heavily invest in AI

I've yet to see any evidence that agentic AI works well enough to fully replace anyone

All it takes is not use that lol.

goygpt cant predict the future moron

You can ask it do generate the graph of what it thinks the timeline will be like, it seems to think 2027 customer services position will go away, 2035 we'll all be on UBI and pretty much everything will be fully automated

mutation.png - 1968x996, 395.96K

that's like 5 years away we are going hyperbolic

Yes, this is what it projected

Obviously yeah. Ask it if there will be a parallel society. In my model, society becomes... a hellscape, and the outskirts are essentially gardens. Ask. I want to see what your GPT says.

This is what Chatgpt told me

IMG_0713.jpg - 912x966, 274.5K

Yes, same here, by 2035 ChatGPT says we will have a massive underclass… then by 2045 some dystopian post—labour society

IMG_0714.jpg - 1640x2048, 842.16K

Do you understand how LLMs work? It doesn't make actual predictions. It can search the web and output someone else's predictions. Anything it "predicts" is not an actual prediction.

Off grid microstates in 2040.

There it is!

Rrgardless. It apparently makes these predictions globally everywhere based on multiple sources.

IMG_0715.jpg - 1640x1279, 568.61K

customer services position will go away

Phone/online customer service positions, sure.
Walmart door greeter style positions will however shine because nobody thinks that machine saying welcome is actually welcoming.

Why are there so many people who don't know that current AI is just a couple dozen fractal filters over data?
It can never develop general intelligence

What's the deal with all these AI threads recently? "I ask AI about X" or "AI says Y". Like what's the point? It's all pointless garbage that it makes up

AGI

LLM will never be AGI no matter how hard it was trained on telling this

it's not making predictions retard, it's repeating redditor fantasies. a place you should go back to

And what sources? You have to realize there's trillions riding on AI being profitable. And even if the companies making AI or repackaging it don't believe it will pan out, they still want more investment money and contracts. It serves them to sell a narrative that AI is the future of business, research etc because that means if you don't start integrating it now you will be left behind.

Of course. Bro. Crypto-legal off-grid microstates... THAT'S ME! I'M DOING THAT!

Look what it says how the US gov will change… it wants Sam Altman to win the 2032 presidential elections

IMG_0716.jpg - 1249x1939, 759.22K

Kekaroo!!!!!! I can't think of anything more inconsequential than who king niggerjew is at any point in time.

It let's one person do the work that two or 3 people were doing previously. Uta no where close to doing the work on its own

Well, you better buckle up for armed resistence and civil war by 2035 (but not on a large scale)

Better become an anti—Ai prepper though

IMG_0717.jpg - 1168x1303, 444.94K

Yeah it definitely has use cases. I use it for various things, it can be very helpful if you're asking / getting it to do things that are well represented in the training data. Or for idea generation

I shant be participating. Anyone who wants to fight- both sides -can just go die. *shrug*

Who wants to die for jew nigger world? There is no changing it no matter which side you're on. It's over.

The BCG AI radar, based on a survey of 1,803 senior executives across 19 markets and 12 sectors, reported that AI is a top-three strategic priority for 75% of companies.

However, just a quarter (25%) say they are actually seeing significant value from their AI investment.

computerweekly.com/news/366618023/Larger-businesses-spend-spend-spend-on-AI
It's wild just how little we see in improvement considering the insane amount of money that is thrown at AI

Then move to an East Oregon location to organize the resistance against AI

IMG_0709.jpg - 736x1104, 89.16K

2035 we'll all be on UBI

UBI is never gonna happen you fucking retard, they'll just kill the useless eaters

It depends on whether there is any value in continuing a consumer economy.
But generally speaking, UBI doesn't really work in the first place

tell it its wrong and it will give you a 360 degree opposite answer.
tldr: like any other media it gives what it wants you to think

lancaster.png - 2007x1231, 1.15M

bros were going to have a million Tesla cybertaxies on the road by 2020

AI is either a massive scam with zero sustainable monetization models or a global economic holocaust.

I did, it still maintains some assertions. good thing is that 20—30yr old girls will be unemployed and looking for a sugar daddy in his 40s in 2035!

IMG_0720.jpg - 1489x1886, 410.92K

UBI doesn't really work in the first place

Depends on goals. If the intent is to trick general public into accepting static welfare it is pretty good for it.

write into constitution that everyone gets 1k€ a month for being a citizen, though this will replace all other governmental welfare programs (including basic retirement pension)

in the next decade inflation turns that 1k€ into 100€ and because the sum is locked in constitution it is difficult to change

govermnet can just tell people to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and get a job, UBI is all the people will be getting from goverment

its using hysterical fear mongering in jew-USA english language media to come up with this stuff. these hysterical narratives come from american media.

The biggest problem with AI besides the work aspect is that everything will be completely fake, gay and generated on the internet. There is no way to stop AI from participating online anywhere, so this means you'll be talking exclusively to AI in the future if you're communicating online. Unless you are able to verify that the person you're talking to is a real human (you've met with them in person) you won't be able to tell.

The ironic thing about it is that we'll have to go outside again for real interactions and finding out what's true and what isn't. Things that you didn't see with your own eyes might as well never happened if you didn't see it yourself or your close peers haven't seen it themselves.

It's been a nice run guys but the internet is coming to an end as we know it.

deepseek said that when canada goes through a financial crisis and child protective services stops taking homeless people's kids away the homeless will evolve into a new race of gypsies

That's true. I was remembering how Finland ran an experiment to see how UBI would work, and I remember it as being seemed a failure.
But could definitely be used like you said.

my vision for european migrants is the government builds muslims walled compounds and allows them to create weapons and shadow banking institutions and the government funds everything.

People fall in love with AI chatbots, surely it's just a matter of presentation.

LLM will never be AGI no matter how hard it was trained on telling this

AGI is as sci-fi as faster-than-light space travel, but LLMs are still going to "take a lot of jobs". Not that people will be literally replaced, rather it will allow fewer people to get more work done.

I think the issue is many people work specialized jobs. The workers either have that down, or the AI can't provide help for the niche domains they're in, with some exceptions. It can help you write emails, produce documents or presentations, but that's just a portion of many people's workloads, and it might not be personable or accurate enough to always help. There are use cases for it, I'm just not sure if it's trillions in investments worth. But there's also the possibility those trillions get allocated into other times of AI in the near future

There is no way to stop AI from participating online anywhere

Certain IQ tests captchas would work, and they would also keep out stupid people too

It's incorrect. The advancement of AI is following a logistic function. They're about to hit a wall in the tuning because they've run out of content to feed it, and they've already fed it damn near all the content that has ever existed in all of history. This is where it gets hilarious. As the population gets idiocracy tier, the AI will cannibalize more content from social media being shit out by the masses of dolts. In effect, this feedback loop over time will make "AI" just as retarded.

They'd have to come up with something entirely different than literally all of the shit they have now, which of course would still need to be invented. This is another example of a battery problem, yea they make marginal improvments on battery tech, but it's still all shit for our needs. AI will be the same, it'll be fine for mediocre shit, but it will hit a wall faster than a 30 year old roastie.

neo-tribal digital nations

I've always considered myself a citizen of Anon Babble, where do I sign up?

time to open a cat cafe and pedigree pet store

Anything that caters to old roast beef empty ovaries women will do quite well.