How the hell did we get to space and the moon in the 60s and now astronauts get stuck in space for months?

What kinda faggot name is Buzz anyways?
Unless it's supposed to read as Booze, because I'll need a lot of it to believe that bullshit.

competence crisis
Apollo era NASA was literally a massive corporation dedicated to getting to the moon as a national goal, because a president was just killed
it ended once we got there because it was ludicrously expensive and there was nothing on the moon justifying the continued expense
you'll never get that level of competence in it again

it's still funny that niggers act like robotic cameras that could do timed shots like this didn't exist in hollywood already at the time

There really is no conspiracy there.
Hurr durr hy can't we build it anymore? We're so advanced today!!
Think of how they designed things back then, how they stored their blueprints etc. So yes, we could replicate most of the mechanical parts if we really wanted to but that would take some time to figure out how they made things. It's probably easier to just design these things from scratch based on modern tech.

Apparently he’s a self centered dick, but given that he went to the moon I get it. All the other astronauts are humble, I’ve spent hours listening to interviews on YouTube

Buzz has been senile for a long time now, there's a video people keep reposting of him supposedly saying we never went, where he's visibly fucking senile and babbling through trying to explain that HE doesn't understand why we never went BACK

he went to the moon

LOL, no, that theatrics actor never been there.

competence crisis

Structural decay. Stagnancy. Agree?

LSD will do that to a mofo

stagnancy is staying in one place, you would need to be competent to do that
see: African infrastructure after whites left

Because back then it was an individual pinnacle mission. Now fucking around in orbit is so routine that we're allowing companies to send partially figured test articles up for shakedown runs so now you have testing induced mishaps interacting with and causing logistics issues. It's like asking why fighterjets can come in, land and be parked on an air craft carrier in minutes while passengers on commercial jumbo jets can be delayed in reaching their gate by hours.

not unless you're on some Syd Barrett level with it and I don't think Buzz was anywhere near that

youtu.be/OROlF8zB9z0?si=2U-fkU9zg4TQTBFu
Buzz aldrin gets mad at critic

massive funding and a willingness to take big risks

How the hell did we get to space and the moon in the 60s and now astronauts get stuck in space for months?

Apollo landings were fake and grey.

Nasa used to have balls.
They're not willing to crack eggs to make an omelet anymore.

it's still funny that niggers act like robotic cameras that could do timed shots like this didn't exist in hollywood already at the time

nooooo, in a field where it's the norm to have triggers for system activations timed down to the fraction of a second, how could you possibly synchronize your clocks and execute a precision input down to the fraction of a second >:(

Not to mention they never mention and get assblasted if you bother to bring up the previous handful of attempts they made to pull of that shot on previous missions where they didn't have the synchronization correct and the camera move missed the launch or jumped the gun.

they got feminized. every government and corporation has been horrifically feminized

We had the technology then, but we lost it afterwards according to NASA.

lies to get access

ambushes you in the lobby after you tell hi to fuck off

calls you a liar and a coward

HE JUST A CRITIC!!

whatever Bart

honestly the strongest evidence in favor of it being faked is typically outright ignored; the fact that well over 1000 steps needed to be almost perfectly executed with no non-human errors, in sequence, to pull off actually landing there and returning successfully

and I believe it actually did happen

Correct. Just well adapted, locked down. The optimum is a trap. A sinkhole for a species. Or simply a hard restriction for subclades ... :)

these niggers literally separated, did a 180 degree turn, and precision docked with the lander module, while traveling 25,000 mph
and that's just one step

One question more. In vacuum of moon, how are the astronauts suit controls temperature?

This is the answer its just money and political commitment. In the 60s the US was involved in a space race as part of the cold war. People forget that NASA was afraid of the Soviets beating the USA to the moon right up until the Apollo 11 landing. There is no equivalent motivation now the Chinese are the only ones in the race to land on the moon with humans and they have already won the race for being the supreme nation and economy of the 21century. Nobody is going to get excited over woke NASA landing some people of color on the moon to make some racist anti-white statement. Diversity is our weakness.

its worth looking up the numerous errors and outright fuckups thats happened on every missions. several missions were almost aborted because of them.

oh come on anon. five million mph doesn't matter one bit when your velocity relative to the other vehicle is a couple fps.

Elon is personally launching a rocket to the moon and mars later today

90% reflective suit outer rejects sunlight while suit uses watercooled under garment (lots of little tubes flowing with water) to move body heat in that water to the outside of the suit, which then sublimates, taking the heat with it.

1000 steps needed to be almost perfectly executed with no non-human errors,

The Apollo 1 astronauts were burned to death in their capsule on the launch pad.
We didnt even get a rocket ignited and killed 3 astronauts.

The assumption that linear precision is the category of the great filter is gravely flawed btw ... there is no escape velocity from ... :}~<

all that we left behind ....

h+ is not a bug, but a feature. The trouble is with the currentstate. it is diseased by necessity.

wow he is very strong

honestly the strongest evidence in favor of it being faked is typically outright ignored

Yeah but that would require them to know anything about the program generally and missions specifically to make the criticism in the first place. If they knew anything about anything they'd be tearing into the risk and complexity of the landing craft deorbit to landing sequence and the liftoff to moon orbital rendezvous, but they don't so they just misquote scripture and fail to beat the kike allegations. Not that I mind.

oh come on anon. five million mph doesn't matter one bit when your velocity relative to the other vehicle is a couple fps.

Yeah but speed is absolute don't you know. Number big so it'll rip the skin off your face.

Lookup the percentage of the US federal budget it took to do it.
Also it's a myth we have better tech now.
Only computers are better, the rest is the same or worse as they're trying to achieve the same for cheaper and laws of physics are the same as they were back then.

actually i`d say the tech is starting to finally improve after decades of stagnation thanks to private companies outside the old legacy contractor scammers. reusable rockets like falcon 9, and soon starship, rocketlabs neutron, blue origins new glenn, and stoke space looks promising too. they`re going to lower the cost to space so much that it will be a new space age

I think the best argument against isn't that they couldn't land on the moon, but the risks (particularly of the landing phase) and the political consequences of fucking it up on live tv.

Imagine if something happened that prevented the Lunar ascent module from taking off and rendezvousing with the CM. They'd have to abandon the 2 astronauts to asphyxiate or freeze to death with the whole world watching.

Even if you're 99% sure everything will work, it's still worth considering faking the actual landing.

Launch the whole mission, transmit the pre-recorded footage back from Lunar orbit.

Demographics and the will to spend 30 bil on measuring cocks

God (yahweh) stopped being real when the age of the earth dropped

The real god still hates faggots though

How the hell did we get to space and the moon

by flying up and a bit sideways

Unfriendly and mildly incensed reminder that industrial capacity is not synonymous with "technology." What they destroyed was US manufacturing capability and the willingness to pay people for work done.
I remain unable to determine if this clown is legitimately retarded or just being fed lines. My money is on both.

How the hell did we get to space and the moon in the 60s and now astronauts get stuck in space for months?

They weren't sure they could do it so they let 175 IQ weirdos do everything.

After they did it they said "Oh space must be easy" and hired people like themselves, brown nosing midwits.

i think its well poisoning. they pretend to be retarded so they can say Anon Babble is retarded. in the wake of the vaccine resistance from this place they`ve got a 24/7 well poisoning operation here to spam flat earth threads etc. is a retarded argument on purpose.

This

DEI is nasa's greatest strenght.

i think its well poisoning. they pretend to be retarded so they can say Anon Babble is retarded. in the wake of the vaccine resistance from this place they`ve got a 24/7 well poisoning operation here to spam flat earth threads etc. is a retarded argument on purpose.

This is absolutely a major thing. I'll prove someone wrong to their face and they're saying the same thing two days later.

I don't understand why those stuck astronauts couldn't just put on parachutes and jump out of the ISS.

I am guessing that there are a lot of things that confuse you on your daily life. Don't worry too much about it

The final landing sequence the riskiest part, an order of magnitude of more things can go wrong compared to most other parts of the mission. The LEM had to be manually piloted during landing site selection and touchdown, and there wasn't much reserve fuel for mucking around if the initial spot is unsuitable.

You can imagine a situation they have to hover around to find another spot, and under the pressure and depleting fuel, the landing isn't perfect (maybe a little too much horizontal velocity) and a landing leg gets damaged, and as a result there's a problem with launching the ascent stage.

Look at the recent unmanned lunar missions, a bunch of the probes fell over and spoiled the mission cause a landing leg broke.

I thought flat earthers were 100% trolls, just pretending to be retarded and taking the piss.

There are serious ones though and they're mostly religious people adhering to Biblical description of universe.

Give Nazi scientists amnesty and allow them leeway to build rockets for us

They gather their collective genius to get us to the moon

Kikes don't like this because 1. Nazis are sending us to the moon 2. They aren't the chosen ones uplifting us into the space age

Have all recorded data erased for "legal reasons"

Spread the idea that dem crazy ass whipeepo never went to the moon and that only non-whites and kikes can send us to space

Effectively destroy the industrial and technological capability to send anyone to space

Is it your first time learning about the shittification of the world or are you just a duplicitous kike?

I feel so bad for those intuitive machines guys. Fuckup after mishap.

Sideways and a bit up really.

it sounds retarded but there was kind of a concept for sort of doing this.

anyways they had a dragon docked with the iss the entire time in case of emergency. they could have brought them back anytime. but then there would be only one astronaut on the station for a while and they were too cheap to send an extra couple astronauts up early to take their place

there was some innovation there though. the challenge was to make the smallest and most accurate lander possible. with a far far more accurate landing then anything before. they nailed it except at the last moment when the leg broke and it tipped over. accurate landing though, landed it right where they wanted to instead of settling with a very wide landing area like before

We live inside a black hole. Space is just circles. It woult take 1000 years to bring trees and civilization to another planet

sea rescue

You hope. Might deorbit into a jungle, desert, or mountain. Probably break your back touching down on land like that.

We didn't.

heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm

yeah it was bonkers. rough ride for sure. probably cancelled for good reason. still neat though

>The design was proposed by General Electric in the early 1960s. The system was quite compact, weighing 200 lb (91 kg) and fitting inside a suitcase-sized container. It consisted of a small twin-nozzle rocket motor sufficient to deorbit the astronaut, a PET film bag 6 ft (1.8 m) long with a flexible 0.25 in (6.4 mm) ablative heat shield on the back, two pressurized canisters to fill it with polyurethane foam, a parachute, radio equipment and a survival kit.[

>General Electric performed preliminary testing on some of the components of the MOOSE system, including flying samples of heat shield material on a Mercury mission, inflating a foam-filled bag with a human subject embedded inside, and test-dropping dummies and a human subject[2] in MOOSE foam shields short distances

>Neither NASA nor the U.S. Air Force expressed an interest in the MOOSE system,[6] and so by the end of the 1960s the program had been quietly shelved

Space is fake and gay

Did you begin to hate them?
Gradually, even?

Plot twist, those guys actually went and their bodies are still there. It's what they don't want you to see.

weed kills

Neat. They don't try to do fun things anymore.

To understand why that wasn't an option you have to understand what the ISS exists for in the first place. It exists as a persistent test site for zero-g experiments. The whole point was to create a place that could be reached relatively easily (in space terms) that was a zero-g environment. The thing is if you wanted natural zero-g without having to worry about drifting into the immediate sphere of influence of a large body you'd have to go out to a lagrange point or way the fuck out away from anything and neither of those options are economical. The solution they went for is getting zero-g through a stable orbit because sitting stationary at the same altitude the ISS orbits at you'd still be feeling a majority of the gravity you feel at the surface and fall straight down. The issue is a stable orbit means moving over the surface of the planet at almost 5 miles/s. Ignoring the complexity of executing orbital maneuvers for the sake of this explanation, if you wanted to get back to the surface you'd have to bleed off that 5 mile/s (~18,000mph) velocity down to zero somehow. Parachutes won't do the job and the plasma interactions with the upper layers of atmosphere as you make your way in would obliterate you without elaborate heat shielding. A capsule of some sort is basically the bare minimum equipment required to make a return from orbit without ending up burned to ash and sprinkled across the jetstream. That's why they had to shift schedules around, bump some people from some missions and wait for a functional capsule to make the return.

I know you're talking shit but there may be people lurking who have that question.

nah you just need a plastic bag and some foam

if you wanted to get back to the surface you'd have to bleed off that 5 mile/s (~18,000mph) velocity down to zero somehow

You only need to slow down like 100 m/s to lower the perigee of your orbit from the ~400km altitude of ISS down to <50km.

You'll fall towards the earth, get ballistically captured by the atmosphere and keep falling.

If you bled off all your speed first and fell straight down you wouldn't be hitting the atmosphere at 7.8 km/s orbital velocity, probably only like 2km/s from freefalling.

Would you even generate plasma at that speed? Parachutes only need to open close to the surface where terminal velocity low, they're designed to handle that.

You'd still be cooked without heatshielding though.