The Guardian whining about the fundraiser for Lucy Connolly:
Loss of sentence appeal over Southport tweet boosts far-right fundraising for Lucy Connolly
At the same time, the judge who sentenced Connolly has become a target of abuse. Social media posts included one by a far-right influencer who mocked up a photograph of the judge under the heading: The Banality of Evil: Who is Lucy Connolly’s Anti-British, Woke Judge?’
theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/may/26/loss-of-sentence-appeal-over-southport-tweet-boosts-far-right-fundraising-for-lucy-connolly
They're referring to this article from the Jolly Heretic:
The Banality of Evil: Who is Lucy Connolly's Anti-British, Woke Judge?
Inman married, in 1999, aged 42, to Catherine Mccahey and, in 2003, they had a son called Finn Andreas Inman. Tight-lipped about his life, like Starmer, none of this is in his Who’s Who entry. His hobbies, apart from sending mothers of young children to prison for their words published in the heat of the moment, are skiing and listening to the piano; not even playing it: No creativity, no inner life, no introspection . . . a robot-like functionary of the New Labour Regime and a wary one at that.
What a dull man, what a semi-robot . . . but, yet, this semi-robot is dangerous. He practically lets off a man who takes a child’s life via his dangerous driving, yet is content to throw the book at an emotionally unstable woman with a very challenging background who gets upset because the lives of 3 children are taken, during a period of hysteria. What does Inman get out of such behaviour? Is it a feeling of power and moral superiority which allows him to compensate for being such an uninteresting man? Or is he, sadly, unable to resist the demands of a totalitarian; unable not to be drawn into hysteria? Skiing and listening to piano music . . . the banality of evil.
jollyheretic.com/p/the-banality-of-evil-who-is-lucy