Is reverse colonization justified?

Is reverse colonization justified?

Yes.
/thread

It's not colonization if you're on welfare.

You have know clue what colonisation even is, do you?

UK, france, german deserves it but other European countries on that map they dont i pity them accepting mass immigration without filter

we were already conquered by jews. it's always cute when brownoids think they are a conquering force and not parasites

Why come there are no White people in 90% of Africa if Africa was colonized by Europe?

Africans should be replaced with Europeans

Colonization (British English: colonisation) is a process of establishing occupation of or control over foreign territories or peoples for the purpose of cultivation, exploitation, trade and possibly settlement,

If you open the door and let them in then it's not colonization. Colonization is usually done by force.

i pity them accepting mass immigration without filter

Its their own decision. Nobody forced Romania to import foreigners.

So then what the fuck is a colony?

Europeans improved every place they colonised. Africa was not colonised though. At no point did Europeans displace the natives as occurred in the Americas and Oceania. Africa was essentially turned into a tributary state and its arguable whether it ever actually paid off. Europe invested huge money into sub-Saharan Africa but likely didn't see much in return. The race for Africa was driven by international competition rather than economic need.
Conversely, Europeans are being displaced by brown and black people.

A place to live.

Conversely, Europeans are being displaced by brown and black people.

They are not. Nobody is forcing Europeans out of Europe. More people in Europe does not equal displacement.

Dunno, but jews are scum.

Colonialism is merely an excuse for conquest.
Finland, Norway, Ireland and now also Poland, Croatia Estonia etc didn't have colonies but they get flooded anyway.

Where are the 3rd Reich and the Roman Empire on the world map?

You can't be this fucking retarded.

no

but they get flooded anyway.

It was their decision to open their borders. Nobody forced them to do it.

Based might makes rights.
Jews won, they are strong.

Try a definition that hasn't been smeared with all kinds of negative connotations by kikes with an agenda and self hating liberals.
webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Colonization
webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Colonizing
webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/colony

Europeans improved every place they colonised.

Everywhere niggers and browns colonize it gets worse

They don't care.They are just petty and want revenge.If they can displace white people,turn their countries to shit and rewrite history then so be it.

Nobody forced them to do it.

Imagine being this naive. You gotta be shilling or the newest of newfags.

Europeans are killed by migrants

Europeans are left homeless whilst migrants are given housing

Europeans are taxed to poverty to pay for migrants to breed

You're the same kind of person who says nobody was forced to be vaccinated.

Colonization means taking land and exploiting its people or resources. Its rather straightforward.

people vs countries

Are you retarded?The Italians and Germans are still here.The Italians are way more Roman than the mutted larping jews are ancient jews.

Europeans are killed by migrants

They are not

Europeans are left homeless

Europeans receive welfare and housing from the state as well

Europeans are taxed to poverty to pay for migrants to breed

This does not constitute displacement

Europeans will just be the minority percentage-wise. Other than that there are more Europeans right now than at any point in history.

Are you a Jew?

Whites build Blacks destroy

Colonisation means transplanting parts of your people to a remote place but keeping jurisdiction. Why be disingenuous and kvetch about "exploitation" for no reason? Did you even click the link and read the definition?

No

To this day they are still crying about Rome burning down their silly temple for retarded jewish chimpouts.

You kvetch like one.

Europeans improved every place they colonised

That's not even remotely true. 90-95% of natives in the Americas were wiped out thanks to European colonization from disease, war, enslavement and exploitation. Europeans being outbred by migrants over time is by comparison a far milder fate, especially given native Europeans still hold the reins by and large and aren't dying/being killed en masse or enslaved like what they subjected the natives of other places to.

What are you? This is relevant as you are telling Whites they should not look after their collective racial interests.

Does that mean that people that arrive into Europe follow all the laws of the countries that take them? In that case you should not be complaining...

Yes, by the means of the colonizers
Not the help and hand holding of degenerate urchins
You stupid duck in order to colonize a place your people need to have planned every aspect
Being shipped to become a tax slave at the behest and innovation of the indigenous country isn't colonization, it's being a useful retard for your new masters

ONLY if the benefits of reverse colonisation far exceed those of the current colonisation.

90-95% of natives in the Americas were wiped out

Sounds like a major improvement to me

I am Slavic

its a jew because ofc he is, just look how he reacted to me mocking jews.

They're not colonizing lol. They're immigrating into welfare systems because they're too incompetent to make it on their own.

If it is then reverse reverse colonization is justified.

Maybe to you, but not an improvement to the people already living in the Americas. Which is exactly what you are complaining about is happening to native Euros now.

Two wrongs do not make a right

Missing the point, moron. My point was, European colonization was NOT an improvement to the lives of the natives they had conquered which the anon I first responded to claimed.

The Slavic lands are marked for extermination. General Plan Ost is being implemented only by different hands and their are more Slavic deaths than births while resources are being siphoned off by criminal oligarchs who hate the common people. In many ways things are more dire in East Europe than in West Europe, action must be taken, the criminal business cast must be cast off, and the money given to young couples to have children if your civilization is to continue.

Yeah, that is true. We have a lot of problems that need to be fixed.

That's not a slav, its an eastern Ashkenazi larping as a slav.

Look I dislike jeets as much as the next guy, but it is willful ignorance at best to pretend that colonized lands weren't occupied.

It was one thing if they stayed to unoccupied coasts, but we know that isn't what happened.

Colonies wiped out natives (americas and new zealand) or subjugated them (indian subcontinent, africa, asia).

inb4 empty terrain

Major cities like aden and zanzibar were taken in colonial exploits.

The simple reality is that the difference between european colonialism and what jeets are doing is that the europeans won the land by invading.

The jeets are just moving in with the consent of suicidal whites and conniving jews.

Ultimately the land should just go back to who rightfully owns it.

Jeets outta europe, whites outta south africa for example.

America can stay mostly white since the natives don't exist, but should retain what blacks it brought over since they didn't come on their own.

There problem solved, america is now 77 percent white, europe is 100% white, and everybody else gets their stuff back no zog bases.

Only jeets and jews lose, the former because their country sucks, the latter because they don't get a country.

You're missing the point, dumbass. Sending violent people to prison isn't an improvement to their lives but still an improvement on the societal level. Replacing violent, backwards societies with intelligent, civilized ones is a majorb improvement for everyone involved in the long term.

No

europeans conquered africa and colonized it, this is normal and has happened throughout history. The europeans colonizers were stronger than the locals and took what they wanted.

Now europe is being attacked by africans and it is in the process of being conquered. If they let the africans conquer them then that will also be normal. Same thing is happening in america

That is correct mostly, but there are exceptions.

For example congo was so bad with cannibalism being common, so conolization (after congo free state was abolished, that was hell) made it better.

Same goes the other way, the visigothic kingdom were so bad to iberians in europe that the arab invasion was an objective positive comparatively, in fact the iberians aided the invaders.

In some rare cases its an improvement, but this is not the norm.

whites outta south africa for example.

The blacks who live in S Africa are a different ethnicity than the original black inhabitants.The white colonialists started arriving around the same time the new blacks started invading and killing off the original natives of the land.

Replacing violent, backwards societies with intelligent, civilized ones is a majorb improvement for everyone involved in the long term.

I'm not even going to bother touching the "violent, backwards societies" claim here because it's not relevant. The death and enslavement of a people is NOT beneficial to them or an improvement for them in either the short or long term. European colonization may have improved the lives of Europeans, but it did not improve the lives of the natives that were conquered. Death/becoming a second class exploited slave is not an improvement in any sense and arguing otherwise is fucking retarded.

If you want to fix them then you must ally with those who you just marked for colonization. We share the same fate, we must join or we will perish. There is no other option.
Jews have trouble denying their Jewishness, the usually exit the chat when asked about it, also saying Jew seems to hit harder then saying Jewish. No, this is just Marxism.

The current colonies are violent, backwards, jewish slave states.

Its hardly an improvement.

Furthermore the majority of these nations are still native, but now have fake and gay borders.

All in all, the vast majority of colonies didn't replace the native peopels, only created ineffective states that caused the massive refugee crisis.

Without colonialism most of the world would not be sending refugees, and europe would still have their tech advantage.

With the exception of America and ANZAC, you should concede that it was a negative for whites.

.

No. Import braindead people you get braindead people.

It was their decision to open their borders

It was a decision of small economic and political elite.Large sections of the population are against it.

Irrelevant, we all agree that races should not mix.

Those blacks were still black, and belonged to africa.

its like saying the brits have equal claim to britain as jeets because the anglo-saxons are germanic invaders.

In some rare cases its an improvement, but this is not the norm.

I do agree with this. I'd add the ending of other archaic and rather awful practices like sati in India is also a rare beneficial part of colonization.

The death and enslavement of a people

Without European colonialism we would still have chattel slavery in third world countries.It was the Euro colonizers who forced the local nobles to liberate their slaves and actually paid them.A small part of the tax in the UK was to pay off the debt from the money they paid to the nigger nobles to liberate their slaves.This debt was paid off arounf 2016-17.

it's not relevant.

You gotta be shilling me.
The death and imprisonment of criminals is widely accepted as a net positive for society. It's the same with violent, criminal societies.
Bet you believe in the holocaust. You think it was justified invading and pacifying Europe and Germany specifically? It sure costed the lives of many Germans. By your logic, since their violent backwards holocaustal behaviour is irrelevant to the question, you should condem the Americans intervening and invading Europe to replace its Nazi leadership with different people.

I believe a strong purely white Europe is a bigger threat to me than any sort of migration. Last time Europe united on a racial bases, it went on a crusade against us as people. Non-whites are currently preventing them from ever attempting anything like this. A purely white Europe is an existential threat to my people.

Sorry about the potable water, I guess.

Jews have trouble denying their Jewishness

They deny it when it benefits them and flaunt it when it benefits them.They have no problems lying about it.

Germans, Anglos, Scandinavians, Brits, Dutch etc. I love Italians and Spaniards though, they are great people and they seem to be doing great too. Last time I was there, they seemed to be doing nicely.

or just mock jews and israel and see their reaction.

You're telling me killing and enslaving native Americans is wrong no matter how backwards and violent they are. Thus, by the same logic intervening in Europe by aiding the Brits and then later invading Germany and killing Germans is wrong no matter how violent the Germans were.

Germany declared war upon the US in supporting their ally Japan and suffered the consequences for doing so.

The US already entered the war earlier by supporting Germanies enemies with supply and ammunitions. Despite the American public being largely sympathetic to the Germans rather than the Allies.
You're not gonna respond because you're scared you're gonna embarrass yourself even more.

I "justify" whatever is good for my race. TND is justified because it removes a hostile competitor species and gives us a continent full of prime arable land and vital economic resources.

It is definitively based.

free shit nigga

We will crush you, because you deserve to get crushed. God gave this world to man to rule over beasts.

You're telling me killing and enslaving native Americans is wrong no matter how backwards and violent they are.

No you fucking retard, I'm actually going to try one more time to try and bash through your autistic german skull - whether it's right or wrong is IRRELEVANT. The point is that them being killed/enslaved is not an improvement for THEM, the fucking natives being enslaved or killed. Which is the entire point of the conversation we have been having here. Especially in the case of the Americas where 90-95% of natives died as a result of colonization. The only people seeing an improvement from this is Europeans.

And by the way, by your logic, the very violent acts Europeans took to conquer, subjugate and exploit their colonies would mark them as the type "criminal society" you are schizo babbling about for that reason above.

It is because if yuros are not defending themselves then they deserve it.

Russia is being taken over by muslims
Hungary and Serbia has chinese troops patrolling there so chinese flag on it.
Greece needs turk flag too
Most of these flags are outdated, it's most africa coming now

Native Americans still have countries. They have Greenland and most of south America except Brazil and Argetina

As someone who is only 1/4 Germanic and the rest composed of mostly Celtic and Mediterranean I share your concern with Nordicist Supremacist, they used similar tactics with, starvation, terror raids, colonization, I had family(now dead) who were with the IRA, I'll always hold British Nationalist's in suspicion no matter what, but I also know the White guilt and ethnic being pushed on Brits will be pushed on Ireland, Spain, and Italy. We don't choose our allies.
Anything that makes them feel like an out group seems to do this.

You're trying to damage control with a lot of pilpul and chutzpa, it's hilarious how transparent you are. We've already been through this two times. Now for a third now, why would you care if it's an improvement for them being killed or enslaved?
Criminals being killed or incarcerated isn't a problem for you, is it, despite that not being an improvement for them?
Killing nazis and invading Europe surely wasn't an improvement for the nazis either now, was it? But you don't care, do you? You think it was an improvement for the whole world and therefore it was justified, right? You see where I'm going?
The Europeans were justified in their behaviour. They entered South America and encountered lots of violent, disturbing, evil rule so they united some of the subjugated people and overthrew the violent rulers. Many more died by disease but you can't fault the Europeans for that, can you? Those people would've died by disease all the same if all the Europeans would have done was hold each other by the hand and sing kumbaya with the natives.
You retarded shillshit.

They are just shit people generally and will do all this shit again to you and me given the chance. Currently they are down and humiliated and this is the only reason why Germany is not trying to fuck up Poland and Britain has no problem with Ireland. But should they regain any sort of national pride, they will do it all over again or at least try. I do not hold any hatred against them, I do not wish death upon them. I simply believe that saturating them with other people will keep them weak and prevent from doing the things they usually do. Seeing what happened to Germany because of their actions, maybe its for their good as well. Ideally, I hope Meds, Slavs, Irish, Hungarians etc. dissociate themselves from the white thing altogether to avoid white guilt being imposed on them. Ireland used to be a colony itself, it should have the right to preserve its national identity.

Shut up, Picaninny. Go back to the fields.

Russia needs one too

Africa's colonization was historically for a short time, from a historical point of view. in the case of black africa it was something like 50-70 years depending of the countries.

watch out for north africa, by applying that karma logic, we have at least the right to colonize them for their medieval invasions and for a LONG time.

Turkey is a also a stolen greek land.

we were already conquered by jews

Holy fuck the amount of cuckery spewed in this sentence

[tips brushstroke cap]

Now europe is being attacked by africans and it is in the process of being conquered.

What the hell are you babbling about?

Is reverse colonization justified?

justified, as in a just punishment? i guess niggers know in their hearts that their mere existence is a liability to those around them lol

Here's an anon who fails to differentiate between colonization and cultivation

Here's an anon who's been eating up jewish propaganda that's been hellbent in trying to make exploitation a part of the definition of colonisation. Being cocky about it too makes you seem stupid btw.